DISCLAIMER: I'm full of sarcasm. Don't take it for granted.
If you want it more obvious so you can recognize it, please kindly request it in thread.
Your's Sincerely.
Firstly, I've been doing exams and I've just finished. Then I spent a few nights drunk/hungover XD
So those trying to manipulate it into me not scum hunting, or would prefer to place their votes on me (which is completely useless to the town agenda because it generates no pressure and as a result no discussion) get some free scum points.
As most of you who are capable of reading am aware, I have posted crap all content. I pity you if you think you can get a read on that of me, because I can't even get a read knowing my playstyle inside out.
The time to do the "no scumhunting/active lurking" is NOT a few days into the game, and when the person in question has also posted V/LA and has it in his sig. Free hint: It's much more productive a few weeks down the track when active lurking/not scum hunting is a consistent behavior of said person.
I'm reading through this game chronologically, so be prepared for some repetition.
StrangerCoug wrote:Enigma, if you're going to tell me that I've played with you before and I've seen you scumhunt, then I'm going to need to see you scumhunt
AGAIN
. Making convincing posts is more likely to get you a win (as either alignment) than whining and complaining about your experience with past games.
Pathetic excuse to put a vote on me. Game is in page 2. There are people who have posted 1 post in the game. HERPPADERPA they aren't scum hunting either. And for clarification, I actually do blame town for a few losses. Because you have to rely on a other idiots to win it when the time comes, and it happens that scum conveniently like leaving the idiots up for LYLO.
A win/loss ratio is a pathetic excuse to justify a non random vote. Obviously some people don't understand the concept of a team effort (there is no I in team).
Rabies wrote:I never argued that it was. My arguement is that Enigma's post reads like a piggyback plus absolutely nothing original, which seems to be what scum wants: to just go with the flow, conformity.
I'll try be more humorous/sarcastic/dent next time I get to an RVS stage with you.
MacavityLock wrote:Enigma wrote:My play style is like this, learn to love or hate it, it's not going to change.
I don't see a playstyle yet, I just see someone who isn't interesting in taking responsibility for his vote. P.S. There's no such thing as a RVS, every vote has a purpose, it's just a matter of figuring out what that purpose is.
Can anyone say mindless bandwagoing/piggybacking? Ohh wait I forgot, it's not a reason for a scum tell (see Rabies) unless it's posted in RVS. My bad. And I giggle that you genuinely think that all votes have a purpose. I would like you to go back and detail and explain the purpose of ALL the votes on page 1. It's going to be critical in the process of finding scum this game.
charter wrote:I think it's Gonnano, Enigma, and LMP/jimfinn. Gonnano and Enigma are probably buddies with how much Gonnano is going on about Enigma actually not being scummy, and Enigma with how he's doing nothing but being scummy. LMP has been ignoring most of everything, and it really stands out that he has no comment on these two. Jimfinn's first post is still pretty bad, but then Gonnano comes in and votes Rabies and keeps in on Rabies (I can see voting Rabies when he voted Mizzy, but after that, no).
I'd probably say I'm about 85% sure of Gonnano right now, Enigma is less than that maybe 50%, but Enigma has more votes.
unvote, vote Enigma
ITT: We see that charter is still sore that I hammered him last game.
Try and read my sig, it clearly states that I'm going to be V/LA. If you are that confident at finding scum at this stage in the game, I suppose all the scum better just quit right now. PS: you forgot to mention that you are mindlessly bandwagoning when voted me.
Mizzy wrote:As a side note, Enigma never answered my quest for information but has posted a couple times since.
In response to your 40. I'm sure your little glimmer of why I have no town wins is obviously right.
1. Obviously RVS is not obviously over. It's post 40 and half the posts so far have been confirms. I voted the way I wanted to because I felt like it. Ohh and maybe because it was RVS also? I'm not going to attempt to justify a vote in RVS just for your self interest. Thanks.
PS: I don't know what RPOL is so I would assume I haven't played there. Why would you assume that?
charter wrote:LMP wrote:I haven't commented on the Enigma business because it looks silly to me.
What about it looks silly to you? Do you know what Enigma thinks about anyone in this game?
Ohh you could only guess what I really think of half the people in this game. (You don't want to know actually and I'ld probably get mod killed if I mentioned even half of it).
charter wrote:Man, last game I was in, on page three I gave two reads of people as scum. One I said was 100% and one was 99.5%. Both were scum.
Pretty good stuff here man. It really makes your arguments more convincing. PS: What game was this? Surely not 1053.
jimfinn wrote:LynchMePls wrote:Rabies wrote:Do you have anything to say about the jimfinn/charter/Mizzy/Enigma thing?
Shhhh. I'm scum hunting.
This seems intended to drive home the point that he is indeed scum hunting, which appears to be trying too hard to be town.
...
I also find it suspicious, despite his defense, that he refused to vote gonnano in applying pressure until he was called out for not voting him.
UNVOTE: VOTE: LMP
I hope you read my disclaimer at top of this post before you fail to notice obvious sarcasm again. It sees charter already pointed out your
poor choice
of wording.
I also wonder if SC views this as scum hunting. Because he so conveniently noted me out for not scum hunting (obviously I won't be scum hunting if I'm not actually reading the game), when just a few posts ahead, you have jimmfinn with his helpless posts with zero contribution to the game thus far. CONVENIENT HUH??
Riceballtail wrote:UNVOTE; VOTE:Moose
A wagon of victorious measures!
I also do not care for Gonnano.
Are all the white knights pro scum hunters noticing this? Or are they conveniently missing out on the play of RBT and his contribution to the game thus far?
ProkhorZakharov wrote:Enigma wrote:I always scum hunt in my games. I'll just let other endure the insufferable pain of attempting to scum hunt with less than one page of content and do it when there is actually actionable content to act upon.
This is the second worst post. You're not actually hunting scum in this game and there's plenty of content to act upon. According to you, your vote on jimfinn was done as part of an rvs bandwagon. Was it a random vote? Are you happy with your vote?
Do I see you scum hunting on page 2 of the game? Stop being such a hypocrite. Better nominate yourself for some worst posts too. I'm going to assume that the questions you are asking are rhetorical hence me answering them would be obsolete.
PS: Are you implying worst posts have a correlation to being scum? You need to make that clear.
Mizzy wrote:moose200x wrote:I think gonnano is not going to help town win and I feel a good policy lynch is in place. I'm ok if we don't lynch him tho.
1) Policy lynches are terrible in general and don't help anyone but scum.
2) Lynching someone because they are "not going to help town win" not only sounds too pro-town to me but it, like #1, is also frickin' terrible. That tells me that you don't think he's scum, but you still want him dead. Again, it only helps scum.
3) If you do find him suspicious enough to lynch, how could be okay with not lynching him without having a better candidate in mind?
4) You have yet to answer any of my questions and you have no exams for an excuse. Feels like dodging and not giving a damn about genuine townsfolk discussion.
In light of those points and the dense overtones of pro-scum sentiment in what you've been hacking up:
Unvote. Vote: moose200x
You do realize that you are pretty much voting him for being a VI (as a result of the reasons you stated). Is that a policy lynch of yours? Or are you just cleverly trying to disguise/manipulate it for your own agenda?
jimfinn wrote:my list of the four you asked about plus my current vote, PZ:
On a scale of 10 uberscum to 1 obvtown
LMP - 7
moose - 6.5
charter - 6.5
gonnanno - 5
enigma - 5
A very original list right here. Does that mean players which have not gotten any negative discussion thus far are automatically town? Or is it just poor logic?
(Fucking charter please stop asking questions I want to ask)
MacavityLock wrote:Prodded. Past couple days have been very busy, sorry. Enigma and jimfinn are the right guys to look at. Not convinced about gonanno yet. Moose, stop trolling and answer questions. Content soon.
Exactly what do you want to look at? I'm V/LA with less than a few posts, jimfinn has posted crap all useful until a few posts just in front of you. Not much to look at really. Ohh btw now that I'm
no longer V/LA
active does that mean I'm automatically town? Awesome, thanks!
Mizzy wrote:@moose200x - There is no such thing as a good bandwagon. Fake bandwagons do not generate pressure. It is failing, do something else.
Then why the hell were you not voting until just the post before?? Your vote had stayed on jimmfinn until then, and that was clearly fail. Ohh wait, you probably don't need to generate pressure since you are actually scum.
The last few posts on page 5 made me giggle IRL.
StrangerCoug wrote:UNVOTE: LynchMePls
Let me take a closer look at moose200x before I decide to go for him or switch back to Enigma.
Have you been selectively reading all game? Or did you have to go back and read moose in ISO so you could come up with some reason to put a vote on him?
Ohh and I said I would scum hunt, maybe you should wait till when I'm actually back and see if I'm here that I actually do before using the same shitty reason to vote for me.
StrangerCoug wrote:moose200x wrote:I think gonnano is not going to help town win and I feel a good policy lynch is in place.
UGH.
I think both moose200x and Mizzy are a bit suspect here. Village idiot = town, and responding to someone saying you're scummy by saying she's being mean is at best fluff.
In my opinion, it's a tossup between moose200x and Enigma, but I'm going to go ahead and
VOTE: moose200x. Mizzy
MIGHT
be bussing moose200x, but my case on her is even weaker than my case on Enigma.
Refer to above quote. I think he went back to find a reason to vote him to make his vote look more substantiated. Ohh and I think you are bussing Mizzy. And what case? Mind sharing?
Mizzy wrote:Here's how to play as town, moose:
1) Find scum.
2) State your case.
3) Vote scum.
#2 is the most important and when you do it, you must do it with solid evidence, good reasons, and helpful/insightful input.
Mizzy trying to coach moose, and obvious attempt to try and get some town credit gives me a scummy vibe about her. I don't even see why this post is necessary, moose has been on this site for a while and it's not like he is new at mafia, nor is this a newbie game.
gonnano wrote:I would rather let other people take care of lynching the VI. Honestly, it's going to happen eventually anyway because we can't afford to have him in the endgame, so I'm not going to waste my time with it while there are substantial things to talk about.
Same reasoning as to why I've skipped over most of Moose. It's been discussed and skewed around enough already. I read him as a VI taking this game very jokingly, nothing more.
And moose, at least I'm not comparing you to shotty or andrew94 and people as such. Now that would be mean.
Also, gonnano, the wiki is rubbish. Don't be naive enough to take it as gospel, it was probably written by some self righteous big headded scum hunter.
ProkhorZakharov wrote:Nobody's lynching anybody just yet, so if you're town why don't you start being useful and hunt some scum? If you're trying, you're not trying very hard.
Associating scum hunting with being pro-town is a very dangerous path to take. Nor should that be used buy him a free pass from his current predicament.
Mizzy wrote:If you aren't scum, moose, then it is your job and role to convince us that you are town. Get the hell to it.
And it is scums job to jump on the weakest bandwagon. It's town job to consider all possibilities, such as that the active lurkers: RBT and jimmfinn are scum.
charter wrote:jimfinn wrote:I'm confused - how does win% even matter at all? That seems like a totally irrelevant idea to me.
Should we just lynch you now or are you going to start pretending to scumhunt and stop active lurking?
What about RBT? Or are you just ignoring him? Same for rabies.
MacavityLock wrote:I still think Enigma and jimfinn are best bets for scum.
Rabies wrote:
So you think all the people who have posted the least content are scum? I mean can you even get a read on either of us? Because I sure as hell can't, which is ironic because I'm actually one of the players in question. Are you going to comment (not just ask questions) on either of the active bandwagons or you just going to delude yourself that I'm scum when I currently have zero content posts in the game.
Also answer the question above relating to RBT. Cheers.
Overall
I think that alot of the more active/stronger players (some of which are certainly scum for sure) are jumping on idiots in hopes of getting a easy mislynch. It also provides poor analysis the next day when looking at vote counts, because they can just say: I voted him because he was acting stupidly.
The fact that the game seems tunneled on moose is quite disappointing and will make looking for scum teams hard. I fell scum are using it as an opportunity to stay out of the spotlight and gain some town credit by attempting to scum hunt on some of the easier targets.
Just gut, but I feel that a good portion of the scum team are on the moose wagon. I don't know why goonana still has some many votes on him (or I might just be blind because I stopped seeing alot of discussion on him in the past few pages.)
Gut just tells me that either or both of Mizzy/SC are scum.
But I know that it is much more productive following out this feel than to lynch a VI on day 1, where the information gained the next day is limited.
Unvote
VOTE: Mizzy