Mini 1080 -- txtMafia -- Game OVER

[Herodotus]

@Ray: when/why did you decide chamber was scum?

[Antihero]

Vi, that is the worst vote.

Ever

[RayFrost]

That was towards antihero, you are Hdotus from now on. I decided that cry was scummy, chamber isn't doing anything to dissuade it.

[Herodotus]

How was that to AH? You said "hero never answered" a question related to my disagreeing with you.
You never mentioned cry - why, if she was scummy?

[Herodotus]

And did chamber do anything to make your read on him more negative? The kunk vote? Explain your thought process there, especially considering he'd moved it.

[RayFrost]

My reason for finding her scummy was the lack of backing for her vote on me, which I do recall myself asking for. Chamber's done nada for either way on the read.

[RayFrost]

Sorry, I misremembered. You are correct.

[Vi]

Kast - Already have 10 tabs open at once at any given time.

Fonz has thoroughly beaten into ground that Tasky's case isn't substantiated, more

[Vi]

but T still seems like an easy D1 lynch.

H: "Defense" is not intended as a charged word.

AH: I obv. don't agree but tell me why.

[Vi]

I really want to have more to say but incoherent game + 10 posts/hour = v(dot)v

[Tasky]

(*/* -> *) = scum eager to incriminate me reading what they want to read.
*: I never put mothrax in my top 3 reads. this was an answer to Equinox (note the >>).

[The Fonz]

Tasky, not giving the Cayke reason actually makes you look WORSE, not better.

[Tasky]

*: you voted me, so I know at least that you are wrong => I look closer at you. => I see absolutely no good intention in your vote => I vote you.

[Tasky]

*: and still you use it as an attack point here.

[The Fonz]

After the above, anyone want to seriously try to deny his motives are pure OMGUS?

[Tasky]

*: sandwich post = goodthing-badthing-goodthing = classical move to insinuate someone is wrong, while avoiding a direct attack => terribly scummy.

[Tasky]

*: there is no such thing as OMGUS: you vote me => you are either simply wrong or malevolent. as I said, there was only malevolence in your attack.

[The Fonz]

Also, when Equi put the > > thing in, those were his top 3. What is wrong about thinking you were doing the same?

[The Fonz]

And to respond to your post in MD, the reason it's omgus is I don't believe for a second that...

[The Fonz]

you have made a sincere, genuine effort to work out where I'm coming from here.

[Tasky]

*: nothing wrong with that. but could you please point me out where Equinox used >>, didn't see it.

[The Fonz]

Would you find voting a player for active lurking scummy if it wasn't you? What about making misleading meta statements?

[The Fonz]

That's completely irrelevant.

[Tasky]

*: actually I wanted to make that post a while ago already. I already had the same problem in other games (*). [/OffTopic]

[The Fonz]

And it's a complete coincidence you make it whilst this argument's going on?