Mini 1080 -- txtMafia -- Game OVER

[Vi]

AV: Sympathize w/ a/lurking accusations in beginning, carrying on about Equinox is beyond terrible, wagon votes seem conveniently placed.

also WTH is AV 623

[Vi]

Although speaking of H.
735 "It's my opinion that one of Tasky/kunk is scum"
justification plz because existence late on both wagons is shaky

[Vi]

H 1056
"tasky wagon analysis" has star :curiosity:

also telling kunk to save himself seems off even with PoE reasoning, esp. after "one or other is scum"

[Vi]

Disappointed in lack of RayFrost following - perhaps own fault but w/ever - but vote is presently wasted.

Unvote: RayFrost
Vote: AurorusVox

(L-3)

[chamber]

Your 1071 got cut off, do you mind repeating yourself?

[Vi]

Fonz post-VC "gets it" (re: Tasky).

[AurorusVox]

My mistake; read this as relevant to this game

Vi: "carried on" to explain reasons for earlier vote as people were unsure about why I voted Equi.

[Vi]

Lynching (soft)claimed power roles D1, Y/N

[AurorusVox]

Unprovoked softclaims with open backdoors for changing claim at a later date: Y

[AurorusVox]

But I am not looking for Equi to out his role. I find the way he went about trying to half claim it scummy.

[Vi]

"I don't want to out Eq's role; I just want to lynch her" colonquestionmark

[AurorusVox]

Outing roles is generally not a good idea. But letting something slip by that strikes me as scummy is also a not a good idea. They're not incompatible.

[Kast]

@Mod-

Network crapped out @work today. Should be fixed over wkend; if not my posting will be reduced until it's fixed. Also FYI, I'm V/LA weekends & Thanksgiving

[Kast]

LOTS of posts to follow, not around til Mon, but may not check in til 3-4PM PST, so getting this out now. Vote's gonna stay.

[Kast]

TF-Agreed timing doesn't match simple OMGUS rXn. Task's AV vote reads like gut & timing supports that.

Agree that his TF vote is mostly OMGUS.
1/2

[Kast]

Disagree that it's aimed at easiest target. AV is/has always been "easier" than you. It looks targeted @most frustrating person (ie person who "sucks" most)
2/2

[Kast]

AV-Confused? I am.

My discussion w/TF about a cop claim was clearly labelled hypothetical.

TF&Equi covered it.

[Vi]

@A-Vox: so

assuming we all got some epiphany and started agreeing with you

what do you foresee happening

[Kast]

Equii-If he's done more, I missed it despite multiple rereads & isos.
My point is that AV's contributions have been similar to Task. If people's
1/2

[Kast]

reads are so weak they're lynching based on useless players (eg. Task) instead of lynching based on scum tells, then might as well join the AV wagon.
2/2

[Herodotus]

@Vi: I wasn't thorough about VCA, but:
Tasky(3): TF, Kunk, He
made me think "probably 1 scum. I'm not, and TF is better than null."
I admit, I was lazy --

[Kast]

@Mod/TF-It's crap sportsmanship @best and potentially rules violation for Task (or anyone) to post in MD about ongoing games (regardless of whether you were
1/2

[Kast]

"already going to post anyway"). I ignored it first time TF mentioned, but if it's impacting in game reads shouldn't something be done?
2/2

[Herodotus]

-- but I do think it's a non-null consideration. So 1 of tasky, kunk scum. kunk more likely than tasky.

[Kast]

AV-To be clear
You thought Equi SoftClaimed
S/C was unprovoked => Odd
Odd => Scummy (?)
You voted
Also:
You thought Equi S/C vig
Youre not interested in S/C
1/2