Mini 1080 -- txtMafia -- Game OVER

[Equinox]

1141: I was more interested in RayFrost's justification, which I got.

[Equinox]

I think it's pretty obv by now that I'm something, so: If you guys can't be convinced to lynch AV today, I am perfectly willing to...

[Equinox]

...full claim and get this "softclaim" BS out of the way. "No bullets" is, in no way, shape, or form, a f'ing softclaim.

[Herodotus]

@Equi: you claiming at this point - I don't see the reason. It wouldn't prove AV-scum, regardless of your role.

[AurorusVox]

The back door was the "I could be lying but I'm not" WIFOM comments, as I pointed out earlier.

How can you say you weren't softclaiming when you said this?

[Equinox]

Crumb != softclaim

Nice try.

[Equinox]

Herodotus: My reason would be I strongly believe AV is scum; he got me to deny that I was neither cop nor vig, and that to me smells like PoE/fishing.

[Equinox]

I can see why you say it wouldn't prove AV-scum, though.

[Herodotus]

Even 1151 was antitown, IMO.

@AV: Nonsense. It was definitely a softclaim. Just very nonspecific.

[Equinox]

Herodotus, I've been pretty damn obvious ever since the "no bullets" fiasco. Do you really think not claiming is any more pro-town than claiming?

[Herodotus]

That isn't a reason to fullclaim. Or even say what little you've said.

edit: I don't think you've been obvious. Idk your role, and I don't care to.

[AurorusVox]

Equi #1152, meet Hero #1158.

How does crumbing != soft-claiming? They're both non-explicitly announcing your role.

When did I ask you to confirm not-cop?

[Herodotus]

The only role I can imagine might be acceptable for you to claim is mason. Even that is unnecessary.
You won't be lynched today. Don't even think about claiming.

[Herodotus]

EBWOP: AND DON'T CLAIM NOT-MASON, EITHER!

[Equinox]

1161: You

didn't

, which makes me think you are indeed rolefishing. Here you only talk about me claiming cop, which ofc I would deny if I weren't a cop.

[Equinox]

...and I'd probably gloss over if I were, to ensure that I could claim later. IMO, you can't read Kast and TF's argument as anything but hypothetical.

[Equinox]

They were EXPLICIT about that. Herodotus... /sigh

[Herodotus]

@All: This post has the logic backwards, but looks self-convinced, and I don't see this as a mastermind plan to find out whether Equi is a cop.
If it was: wow.

[Nobody Special]

Can someone please link me to the MD post in question? I looked when it first came up, but I thought that Tasky had started a

thread

, which I didn't find. Now I understand it's just a post (?) and I honestly haven't the time to search Tasky's posts to find it. I am concerned that this game is being discussed; I just can't find it to do anything

about

it. Thanks.

--And I'd prefer a PM rather than derail this thread any further.

[Nobody Special]

Votecount 1.10

AurorusVox - 5 - Kast, chamber, Equinox, Vi, Tasky
kunkstar7 - 4 - Fishythefish, Antihero, AurorusVox, Herodotus
Tasky - 2 - kunkstar7, RayFrost

Not voting: The Fonz

With 12 alive, it requires 7 to Lynch

V/LA: Kast: all weekends/holidays

Deadline: November 22 -- about

two days

forty-seven-point-five hours

Random notes:
--None today; try back tomorrow.

[Herodotus]

@Mod: Conversation in question starts here and continues to next page.

[Herodotus]

If K* votes AV, and TF is still leaning toward voting K*, RF is critical. Ironic he was complaining about being first on wagons earlier. Off the fence time.

[The Fonz]

I will certainly vote K over AV. Better do it now, as I'm going out in a minute, and there's always poss. of net going down 2m or something.

[The Fonz]

Vote: Kunkstar7

[The Fonz]

I don't see a smoking gun tell on anyone, really.