Mini 1080 -- txtMafia -- Game OVER

[AurorusVox]

BUT, IMO, if you think Kast is scum, the suspicion-but-lack-of-vote is likelier to indicate scum distancing themselves from their buddy.

[AurorusVox]

You'd only be worried people are preparing to switch to him as a mislynch if you think he's town. Which you didn't think before. Cause and effect look wrong.

[The Fonz]

everything since the claim is largely null to me, hence no change in position. Pretty much, the premature claim locked me in unless someone else starts looking a LOT scummier than him.

[The Fonz]

Also, Herod: I think we established that asking chamber questions is pointless. I merely point out the things he does that i think are alignment-relevant.

[chamber]

@1898

"suspicions" in that post was short hand for "stated suspicions" from the previous post to save characters -.-. Read better.

[AurorusVox]

And so I presume "stated suspicions" is shorthand for "stated suspicion without votes", which still doesn't address 1900/1901.

[chamber]

@1900:

I disagree.

@1901:

I'm not sure enough about any of my reads in this game to ignore new evidence. I'm even trying to give you and VI a chance.

[Kast]

Skimmed & thoughts
-RF claim plausible
--Wasn't that "early", mountains of molehills
--Agree w/TF that VT claim shouldn't change preclaim beliefs

[Kast]

-Wasn't hyperbole, was flat out misrep
-ftf has been low activity, but reasonable when active

With 2 days we need to settle on a candidate.
VOTE: AH

[Herodotus]

Wish AH was around.

prod time for AH

:eye rollage:

Kast, you saying that RF was active and controvertial earlier?

[Herodotus]

I'm trying to work out the plausibility of a Fishy, chamber, AH scumteam but I'm busy today. That might imply more bussing than is likely. Thoughts?

[Herodotus]

I agree with all of 1907 but don't understand about the claim being "plausible." Is there some conclusion about his alignment affected by claim? - ctd

[Herodotus]

ctd - For instance, did you have prev. vanilla tells on RF that make his claim sound particularly true?

[AurorusVox]

Chamber: Vi asked this but you never answered; is she scum in connection with me?

[Kast]

Hero-note on ftf is unrelated to RF
RF was active until he forgot about game. After he remembered, he's been active again
Clarify what you mean by controversial

[Kast]

I meant what I posted; your ex reads too much into it. RF's claim doesn't contradict prior posts or sound fake.

[Herodotus]

@Kast: I know the note on FtF was unrelated... but the statement they were discussing (and that you called a misrep) was this post. Is the opposite true?

[Herodotus]

Okay.

[The Fonz]

@K: I don't think when he does post, he's more than averagely contentful, and his megalurking makes the sum total scummy.

[Kast]

Aside from that, RF's early day posts didn't

avoid

stances or controversy. People didn't engage him much, but same is true for most players.

[The Fonz]

Was willing to give a pass when it looked like he was genuinely about to flake, but having chosen to play he's not done anything to merit a strong town position. Can you give specifics?

[Kast]

Re-checked links, I misread 1855 as defense against 1843. The misrep chain is here.

[Kast]

flip that order...

[The Fonz]

What difference is there in your mind between avoiding controversy, and not actively courting it?

[Kast]

TF-Are you talking about FtF or RF?