OK LETS BREAK IT DOWN:Toogeloo wrote:Don't pretend that your "What's this dana defense," proposition at me wasn't an open ended statement. It could literally be translated several ways, from asking me "why I don't want to burn dana," to "why am I buddying up to dana," to "what do you see in dana that I don't?"
I can make no assumption that you didn't read the quote and you simply were asking me why I wasn't on the same page as you.
When you read this post your reaction wasn't:Fate wrote:Well well well look who we have here.
Toog whats all this dana defense going on.
And i know what you're going to say,
"Im just callin it how i sees t because im bi-partisan vote me for prez"
But no. I don't want ot hear that, I want to hear what you think of his ALIGNMENT. IN. THIS. GAME>
"defending dana? I wasn't defending dana. I was just reading through his meta, and I was wondering why you think he should be posting content when he never does as either alignment. Oh and
You reaction WAS INSTEAD:
"I never defended dana! I just said Im not willing to a take a stance on him either fuckin way. lololololol BTW FATEYOU COULD BE SCUM PUSHING POLICY LYNCHESSSSSSS"
GG sir.
GfuckingG.
Everyone go re-read Toog's lists posts with this in mind and don't follow the Red Panda to scumsville role choice paradise.