RobCapone wrote:And I would like examples of my so called scummy play cause you are full of shit
You got it. You're not near the top of my scumlist for nothing.
RobCapone wrote:/confirming my replacement in the game
reading through I don't get why we did not lynch Jim he definitly seemed more like scum than PZ did.
If Jim is scum, you're his buddy for this post. And I'm pretty sure jim is scum.
RobCapone wrote:And wow at wanting to give PRs another night when you haven't even allowed everyone still slice to speak yet, what if the PR hasn't even posted yet and has a guilty.
Rushing to NL without allowing any discussion is bad for town and good for mafia.
Nice fishing. This quote is particularly telling if you really are a doc.
RobCapone wrote:This
If cop had guilty and we rush to NL before he outs it that is fucking retarded
It's not role fishing to wait for all people alive to post in this day phase
Even if they just post HI
More fishing.
RobCapone wrote:Than you are retarded cause how you can go from nothing to role fishing is stupid
I don't care if it's mylo, if a cop has a guilty we need to discuss, not even letting people post in a day phase is an attempt to PREVENT the cop to report if he has a guilty
That's not role fishing cause I'm not asking anyone to claim anything
I have no objections to no lynch, but we do not end the day until everyone has posted
P. Edit - just cause you call someone scum makes it true, tbh your behavior is more scummy
More more fishing. Also, this is one of those easy arguments to make as scum, since you get to try and look all pro-town "I just want us to have the information" without actually having to hunt scum.
RobCapone wrote:yes cop should out his results so we can narrow down the list of suspects
More fishing.
RobCapone wrote:Fair enough but I find it hard to beleive somebody soft claims doc would be left alive this stage in the game, plus the way he said it seemed more of a joke to me
You thought he was "joking" when he was softclaiming the doc? And you expect us to believe you are the doc?
RobCapone wrote:The no lynch without any clear PRs was wrong yet nobody spoke out about it but me
This is scummy considering that you voted for the no lynch yourself. A) Why was the no lynch bad, regardless of clear PRs? B) If it was wrong, why did you vote for it?
RobCapone wrote:Tbh I'd rather have cop out his clears than a massclaim
o.O So, you continually pushed for cop to claim, and even voted for the massclaim, but when your turn came, you want us to believe you lied with your part of the massclaim?
RobCapone wrote:Actually lynching ML is better
Suggesting Massclaim benefits scum, I only voted massclaim cause the option was that or NL and I was against the first one, wasn't going to do it again
Here you act like you are trying to lessen your own part to play in the massclaim. I think the real reason you voted massclaim is because it was clear massclaim was what we were going to do, and you wanted to blend with the town. Also to note is your statement that ML is a better lynch, yet you claim you protected him. Presumably you protect people you have a town read on, so why were you calling for his lynch now?
RobCapone wrote:looking back at games I played where I normally play we almost never mass claim, and the only game I could find it was scum who suggested it, so my experience with mass claiming isn't that good.
anyway I am just a vanilla townie
Aside from you now admitting that you lied about your claim, here you are disavowing massclaims, when YOU YOURSELF VOTED FOR IT. Add that to all your claim fishing, and the whole thing absolutely STINKS.
RobCapone wrote:well it seems that if you said enigma did nothing night 2, he was probably role blocked also but I still want him to out who his target was.
You know that you are a doc, and yet when enigma says his shot didn't work, your assumption is that he was roleblocked? Really?
RobCapone wrote:because whenever somebody i think is scum claims a town power role I am not likely to believe them, I think rbt is scum so i don't believe his claim but we have nothing else to go on and I am not lynching him since there is no counter-claim
Your attempt to tar RBT is interesting, especially considering your constant please that an investigative role claim its results. So you seem to know in advance that there must be an investigative role, but he claims investigation, and you say you don't believe him. However, you seem to realize that suggesting we lynch RBT would be stupid, so you throw in a "I am not lynching him since there is no counter-claim". SCUMTASTIC.
RobCapone wrote:and macavity there is no way anyone can convince anyone else that they are town, if you are town you shoudn't be worried about trying to convince anyone else of it, your actions throughout the game should be what convinces people.
Vote: macavity
I think he is one of the scum
Thanks for claiming scum. Why is this so scummy? Here are the posts you've made that all suggest you think jimfinn is scum:
RobCapone wrote:reading through I don't get why we did not lynch Jim he definitly seemed more like scum than PZ did.
RobCapone wrote:anyways I feel we can safely lynch Jim and probably rice as those two are obvious scum
RobCapone wrote:Lol at Jim
RobCapone wrote:if you truly are town, there is no need to have the soft-claim roles to go first.
you were chosen cause your claim seemed sketchy, most people feel enigma is pro-town so choosing him was bad move in my opinion, that being said
With all of that, you also claim now that you protected Mac on night 2, but today you don't want jimfinn lynched, you want Mac!?!? That is ludicrous! With all your "suspicions" of jimfinn, you hadn't voted him until after I did (see below), and it looked like that was the way things were heading. And only after you first voted Mac and pushed for his lynch which was both A) Nonsensical and B) Unbelievable considering you doc protected him on N2.
Does not compute.
RobCapone wrote:the most unbelievable claim here is the vig claim and I find it highly unlikely we don't have a protective role especially if this setup since this setup was revwied
Anyone else get the feeling that RobCapone's doc claim was spawned at this point? Like maybe the scum realized that the claimed roles don't add up or something? Also, how on EARTH was his vig claim unbelievable, when you know you doc protected the person he claims to have shot on N2.
RobCapone wrote:and if you meant governor instead of commuter, that still isn't a protective role
Governor is DEFINITELY a protective role. It protects against a mislynch.
RobCapone wrote:Vote: jim
he definitely is fishy
Nice bus.
RobCapone wrote:also enigma, I am the one saying rbt is probably lying so how does that make me partners with him?
Nice WIFOM.
Add on to all of this Mizzy's sketchy play, and complete absence of any breadcrumb to Doc role, and I call BS.
Unvote
Vote: RobCapone
Die scum.
@Enigma: I'm starting to think jimfinn/RobCapone/RBT is a definite possibility. Thoughts?