SSK(Under Zwet's Evil Mind Powers)'s Random Mafia XL Day 3

[danakillsu]

O.o
Whaaaa? Doesn't that result of themanhimself's vote mean that he is currently a Serial Killer? That's the only role I can think of that has the wincon of surviving and another wincon (killing everyone else). That is why I am currently voting for him. If anyone can shed more light on the situation, it would be much appreciated.

[chesskid3]

my gf just left. catching up now

[chesskid3]

O.o
Whaaaa? Doesn't that result of themanhimself's vote mean that he is currently a Serial Killer? That's the only role I can think of that has the wincon of surviving and another wincon (killing everyone else). That is why I am currently voting for him. If anyone can shed more light on the situation, it would be much appreciated.

Lol this.
Elaborate.

[danakillsu]

my gf just left. catching up now

Scumslip. So who's your GF, anyway?

O.o
Whaaaa? Doesn't that result of themanhimself's vote mean that he is currently a Serial Killer? That's the only role I can think of that has the wincon of surviving and another wincon (killing everyone else). That is why I am currently voting for him. If anyone can shed more light on the situation, it would be much appreciated.

Lol this.
Elaborate.

Elaborate? I thought I made it pretty clear already. If he's voting for the FIRST wincon in his PM, he has more than one, and the one that is left over after the first is gone is that of a Neutral Survivor. The only role I can think of with two wincons, one of which is neutral survivor, is the SK.

[chesskid3]

could also be a worst role ever

[Kitoari]

Danakillsu actually has a good point.

Unvote

I'll think about it.

[Helghast]

@Dana makes sense, but wouldn't it be really stupid to do that?

[danakillsu]

@Dana makes sense, but wouldn't it be really stupid to do that?

Not necessarily. He might think that we wouldn't be able to figure it out, and that we might be willing to keep him around if we do indeed "lynch" his wincon and make him a survivor. But what we have on our hands now can really only be one of two things:
1. A player with a non-town wincon.
2. A player with a town wincon who doesn't want it anymore.
Do we really want either?

[Helghast]

Nah either would be bad. I say we go for him, and wait til he comes back and explains his action.

[Feysal]

There is something else I thought about regarding lynching win conditions. We don't actually know if reverting to a neutral survivor would happen to every player who had their win condition removed. I want to know, so I will test.

VOTE: the first wincon in my PM

Note that the only win condition a player has is also the first, so I've not given away my role doing this. I used the same wording for testing reasons.

By the way, if this works, we could use it to truly break the game for town. Imagine if we stopped lynching people completely, and lynched their win conditions instead. Everyone we consider suspicious becomes a neutral survivor, and we can safely ignore them for the rest of the game, since survivors are compatible with the town win condition. Doing this would totally screw the mafia. I'd rather not actually do this though, since it would result in the cheapest town victory ever.

[chesskid3]

take your gamebreak and go away. I didn't sign up to lynch people's wincons.

[Helghast]

I'm with chesskid not going to vote for any wincons.
What you described there at the end Feysal would be really cheap and I wouldn't want to win that way.

[Feysal]

Fair enough, I did not say I would want to do it either. However, I will not unvote my win condition until I see what the effect would be. If I would also turn into a neutral survivor, it will give me a hint about how scummy themanhimself actually is because of his vote. Specifying his first win condition, implying he has more than one, looks bad enough already.

[Nero Cain]

vote: Feysal

[vezokpiraka]

unvote
vote Feysal

Sneaky scum

[chkflip]

Are you two seriously voting Feysal for the same thing theman did on the last page?

FoS

!~

[Bunnylover]

The two people who voted Feysal should die.
He has said he is testing something, and you two vote him for been a sneaky scum? He testing to see what the result will be, as we did during Day 1 to see what will happen if we lynch some of the rules.

Unvote, vote Vezo

I think this is the second or however many time he/seh has voted that hasn't had any reasoning behind it, or any that she/he has posted.

[chesskid3]

that's what Vezo does. Read him for other things, Bunny.

[Kitoari]

We can't really decide what we're doing with this until zwets gives us a votecount.

Can has?

[Helghast]

Also waitign for vote count and theman to come back.

[chkflip]

Posts V/LA "until Christmas Eve" on the 18th, "Deal with it" on the 19th, and votes Feysal yesterday. Things I do not like in succession of one another. Feels like a cop out to write with little analysis to me.

VOTE: vezokpiraka

[chesskid3]

who'd you replace, chk?

[chkflip]

chkflip replaces Wraith, who requested replacement and themanhimself replaces espeonage.

[chesskid3]

vote: chkflip

Easy vote is easy. didn't replace a townraed so bye bye

[Nero Cain]

Are you two seriously voting Feysal for the same thing theman did on the last page?

FoS

!~

No, although I really really dislike the fact that theman and Feysal are basically trying to get us back into RVS, its not why I'm voting him.

I didn't give a reasoning b/c I wanted to see who jumped and didn't jump.

So why did you vote him vezo?

Why did you not vote him CHK and Bunny?

I also like CHK's vezo catch.

umvote;vote: vezo