No, Guderian was asking others to iso based on his "weak" case. Whereas you proclaim he is focused more on the mechanics of the game than actually scumhunting. There is the contradiction.
Still not seeing any contradiction. At no point did I say that he wasn't scumhunting, I said that his focus was not on said hunting. You are fabricating this "contradiction".
BECAUSE THEY'RE THE POSTs PEOPLE ARE NEGLECTING!!!!!
i HAVENT GOT ONE GODFORESAKEN ANSWER TO ARE YOU TOWN. NOT EVEN FROM YOU! Who knows even if i were to see some sort of courtesy and openess from you, xvart or Katsuki i could be a little bit warmer in my approach to you.
Then let me ask you this: What exactly are you expecting to accomplish from asking this (which you haven't actually asked me in the first place, so don't even fucking start about how I haven't answered)? I'll answer for you: There is nowhere for that line of questioning to go. As I said, every person in this game is going to answer the exact same way, answering differently goes against site guidelines in regards to playing to win. Using this question as frequently as you are only tells me that you fully know this, and are only wasting everyone's time with it, trying to make yourself come across as more town than you actually are. Too much fluff, not enough useful content. Again, another slight AtE by basically playing the victim card. We're all being courteous, we're all being open. You are the one with the closed-mindedness here, not us.
But ftr your vote on Guderian. Is a loada bollicks. As is your suspicion of me. And yes maybe i OMGUS'd you a little bit at first but digging i have not liked what i have read. I dont like why you have gone with the popular lynch rather than building a case on me when fairly, i am that little bit scummier than Guderian, pre latest modscene.
I have yet to receive anything from you regarding how my vote on Guderian is "bollicks" (bollocks, by the way, is correct), or how my suspicion of you is the same. If you brought anything forward that would make my opinion differ, it would change, but you haven't. RE "I have not liked what I have read": A nice way of saying that you still have no case against me, and a nice distraction to the fact that you have yet to actually give any sort of logical reason for your suspicion. Back up your suspicion, and I might take it more seriously. You continue to assume that I am simply going for the "easy" lynch, ignoring the fact that...I have reason for my vote on Guderian, reasons you essentially acknowledged in the same paragraph. At this time (post modscene) I still find the two of you on the same level of scummyness, Guderian reached that point before our little back and forth, and you reached it during our little back and forth. If you pass him on my opinion scale, if you will, you will get my vote. You have not passed him as of the last modscene. I'm certainly not liking how you are pushing this defense of the guderian wagon by pointing out that you "are a little bit scummier than guderian". That logic won't fly here, miss.
But now your willing to lynch either of us? I can happily say im town, can YOU? Or what, do you go from a system of everyone is guilty to innocent? Is that why im not town in your opinion or because we dont see eye to eye? Tell me your town and why you think your actions have been townie? But please enlighten me as to WHY GUDERIAN IS YOUR TOP LYNCH instead of me? Is it cause everyone else is voting him?
A few people in this game might know I hate using this, but a bit of a strawman here. Constant disregard for my points, and a constant chalking my actions up to completely absurd, and inappropriate assumptions. Brings up the whole "I'm town are yoouuuu?" business, which I already stated is a useless waste of space. You are not town in my opinion for the points I have been consistently bringing up in these posts. You are not town in my opinion because you consistently ignore these points and accuse me of having a reason of "we dont see eye to eye".
As for proving myself innocent in this situation, the burden of proof is not on me. You are the one making claims to my alignment, it is your job to bring me basis to your claims in order to prove yourself correct. You can't turn the argument towards me, when you yourself have not given me anything to refute. Innocent until proven guilty, and you have done nothing to even try to show why I am guilty, and I cannot prove a negative.
Ps. RIP Mike. I thought you were town after your non existant levels of activity. But i'd never say for sure, cause, you.......... being you and all.
lolwut? Town due to lurking? I do not understand.
