Hi, my name is Katsuki and I am scum avoiding the thread. Seriously, I'm actively posting in other games but am sitting on my 'getting on a plane' excuse here.
I'll have more to say about the game tonight ...
I gave actual reasons for voting Magna in 83.Fonz wrote:Then your own vote, which you describe as a 'blind leap of faith' in other words, sheeping on Mac.
No, I didn't remember this.Fonz wrote:Then LMP, having unvoted to go to UT, jumps back on the wagon WITH THE SPECIFIC DECLARED INTENT TO FORCE A CLAIM. So yeah, are you still sure no-one voted on that basis?
You didn't give reasons why you vote LMP over Raj. I saw you give reasons to vote LMP and reasons to vote Raj, but I get the impression you're willing to hop ship on to Raj as soon as a lynch becomes "acceptable".Fonz wrote:This is pretty much a blatant lie. What part of 'Looks lie he's trying to force a claim for its own sake' do you not understand? Here's a question for ya, which alignment wagons because they want to lynch scum, and which one wants to force as many claims as possible?
Because the Raj wagon is horrible. All the scummy people are voting him. UT voted him for no reason. It's an extremely poor scum fueled wagon.Magna wrote:Why is LMP a better lynch than Rajr?
Because of all the bad/scummy votes on Raj, I think he's town. Therefore, LMP (who I'm unsure of alignment) would be a better lynch.Fonz wrote:Actually, same question to Charter. You said LMP was a better wagon than Raj. Why? His play has been very similar to yours.
Yeah, so you didn't look for what-ever poor stretches of logic you could muster to justify Sheep voting a rhetoric push.charter wrote:Yeah, the initial vote was following Mac, but then I gave my own reasons once we got past page two and something had happened.
Katsuki, if you're fine with a rajr lynch, then DROP THE FUCKING HAMMER. If you think that lynch is a good plan, then make it happen. Do it. By saying you like the lynch when he's at L-1 and then NOT dropping the hammer, you're trying to say he's a decent lynch but not actually participate. You know, kind of like if he was your scum buddy and you want to bus him without actually hammering.Katsuki wrote:Not sure what to think anymore. Fine with either MOI, LMP orrajr lynch.
Is this an argument where you are trying to say that someone else is scummy for doing what most all of the people who wagonned me, but they are somehow not scummy?Charter wrote:BV also voted Raj for no reason.
Both are pretty bad votes. Almost as bad as the votes on me were.Charter wrote:Magna, what do you think of BV and UT's votes for Raj?
Really? You managed to miss the Mod post not 10 posts above yours that clearly showed Rajr at L-1?Katsuki wrote:Oh he is L1.
Is this a pointless AtE or are you talking about someone else?Rajr wrote:or maybe remove some votes of an innocent dude.
Really? He got a Town Role PM now? Interesting change.Talitha wrote:I like the new-improved peanutman
I thought you might try to provide an explanation as to how you 'mystically' forgot this game. You know, since you are uber-active all over the site.Katsuki wrote:and MOI, yes, I was most definately scum-avoiding this thread.
Did you honestly expect to get a meaningful answer out of that useless question (and fake pressuring)?
Unvote, Vote: RAJR
Eh? Why so interesting? My previous suspicion was primarily due to low activity, and yes indeed my read has gone from lurker-scummy to townish.Kmd wrote: Talitha wrote:I like the new-improved peanutman
Really? He got a Town Role PM now? Interesting change.
I don't recall saying anything like this. Doesn't mean i didn't, but I don't remember.Kmd wrote:I agree with Talitha on Bv-Rajjdhgafdkgka. The hesitance to vote, followed by a vote and unvote could definitely be a scumbuddy-tell.
I'm biased obviously, but there's no reason I should be a vig target.MoI wrote:why should Tally be the hypothetical Vig target