DEFCON Mafia 2.0 - Over, American Victory!

chesskid3 · Post Post #1875 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:20 pm

WHY CANT DIZZY GET MODKILLED?

chesskid3 · Post Post #1876 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:21 pm

anyway the reason you get modkilled
is if there's no nuke
you're modfirmed as not having a silo in attack mode

danakillsu · Post Post #1877 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:21 pm

Why are you laughing at that phrase, Fate? It in no way indicates what players are on the same side as me.

Faraday · Post Post #1878 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:21 pm

Fate wrote:
danakillsu wrote:
chesskid3 wrote:bye dana
NOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooo. I don't wanna die. I've been a model citizen up to this point. And it seems kinda obvious I didn't mean any harm by that. But rules are rules, and I should have read them more carefully BEFORE posting that. It's obviously up to the mod, and I apologise to the
players on my side
if I am modkilled.

LLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOLLLOL

DAT.

chesskid3 · Post Post #1879 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:22 pm

Faraday wrote:
Fate wrote:
danakillsu wrote:
chesskid3 wrote:bye dana
NOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooo. I don't wanna die. I've been a model citizen up to this point. And it seems kinda obvious I didn't mean any harm by that. But rules are rules, and I should have read them more carefully BEFORE posting that. It's obviously up to the mod, and I apologise to the
players on my side
if I am modkilled.

LLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOLLLOL
DAT.

DIS.

danakillsu · Post Post #1880 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:22 pm

chesskid3 wrote:anyway the reason you get modkilled
is if there's no nuke
you're modfirmed as not having a silo in attack mode

Ohhhh... I get that. Then how about this.

Recall: Nuke on Jack

Now I haven't launched a nuke either way.

chesskid3 · Post Post #1881 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:24 pm

modfirm jack as not the failsafe

danakillsu · Post Post #1882 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:27 pm

Well, again, it's the mod's choice, but I don't see why the mod couldn't just say: "If dana is a silo, it was never launched, because he was joking. Therefore failsafe wouldn't happen even if that's what Jack was. Everything's just hunky-dory." And also, everyone knew my role...
But I take full responsibility for my miscalculation.

chesskid3 · Post Post #1883 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:32 pm

are you scum?

danakillsu · Post Post #1884 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:38 pm

No. I am town. Sorry, town.

chesskid3 · Post Post #1885 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:38 pm

that reads fake
you scum
diediedie

Jack · Post Post #1886 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:43 pm

AurorusVox wrote:Not radar. I can explain what I meant by it but it'd be a fullclaim at that point.

I don't get it!!!! There are only 3 unknown roles. I said bob was espeonage, and then I said he was radar. You say you aren't radar. So it's a full claim already!

Nuke: Jack

Kidding, of course.

MODKILL MODKILL MODKILL

Well not really. We can just lynch you.

JACK I FUCKIN LYNCHED YOU FOR THAT LAST TIME WHY ARE YOU CROSSING ME AGAIN

AND LOOK HOW WELL THAT WORKED

Fate · Post Post #1887 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:21 pm

danakillsu wrote:Why are you laughing at that phrase, Fate? It in no way indicates what players are on the same side as me.

EXACTLY.

ITS FUCKIN VAGUE AND WEIRD AND SHIT, BC YOU ACTUALLY WANT TO APOLOGIZE TO YOUR BUDDIES FOR YOUR TERRIBLE FOLLY.

AND YOU CANT APOLOGIZE TO THEM BY SAYING "SORRY TOWN"

"SOWWY AMURIKA"

NOPE.

BURRRRRRRRNNNNNNNNNN

SCUM CAUGHT IN THE FLUFFFIRE.

ILL LULZZZZZZ ALL THE WAY HOME.

Fate · Post Post #1888 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:22 pm

FTR I POSTED THAT^ BEFORE I READ THIS

danakillsu wrote:No. I am town. Sorry, town.

LOZLZOLZOZLZ

AlmasterGM · Post Post #1889 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:26 pm

[Day 3, DEFCON 1 - Vote Count III - Ground Zero]

"Anyone who considers using a weapon of mass destruction against the United States or its allies must first consider the consequences. ...We would not specify in advance what our response would be, but it would be both overwhelming and devastating." --William Perry

[Votes]

AurorusVox

(2) - Percy, Fate

bobsnox

(0)

chesskid3

(0)

danakillsu

(1) - Jack

DizzyIzzyB13

(3) - chesskid3, AurorusVox, Mina

Faraday

(0)

Fate

(0) -

Jack

(1) - bobsnox

Kitoari

(0)

Mina

(0)

Percy

(0)

SocioPath

(0)

SpyreX

(0)

Not voting

(6) - danakillsu, DizzyIzzyB13, Faraday, Kitoari, SocioPath, SpyreX

[Activity]

There will be

no modkill.

Rule #14 exists to prevent anyone from exploiting the setup and gaining an unfair advantage. In this case, danakillsu clearly made a mistake, and no substantial advantage has been gained. A modkill also would cause unnessecary disruption to the game state. Thus, there won't be one.

The deadline is Tuesday, 11 January at 11:59pm EST. Seven votes are required to lynch.

Kitoari

is being replaced.
No prods currently needed.

AlmasterGM · Post Post #1890 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:28 pm

[DEFCON Mafia 2.0 - Day 3, DEFCON 1 - Game Event]

[NORAD SYSTEM] Unidentified transmissions detected.
[NORAD SYSTEM] Capturing...
[NORAD SYSTEM] Audio files captured.
[NORAD SYSTEM] Descrambling...
[NORAD SYSTEM] Descramble complete.
[NORAD SYSTEM] Cleaning up files...
[NORAD SYSTEM] Cleanup complete.
[NORAD SYSTEM] Playing...

gonna try the crosskill tonight

our only hope is to get the russian scum and hope rouge can stay under the radar

aityu

THIS MASTERPIECE SHALL NOT BE FORGOTTEN
IT SHALL BE CONTINUED FOR ALL ETERNITY
FATE DEEMS IT SO, AND FATE SHALL HAVE THE FINAL SAY

MY NUKE WILL BE THE LANCE OF VENGEANCE THAT SHATTERS THE UNSUSPECTING DREAMS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHILE THEY SHOP AND EAT BURGERS WAITING FOR DEADLINE.

Don't claim! They'll figure it out.

[NORAD SYSTEM] Playback complete.

chesskid3 · Post Post #1891 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:28 pm

Unvote

Vote: dana

QUICKLYNCH TIME

Fate · Post Post #1892 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:29 pm

WHAT THE FUCK?

AGM YOU GODDAMN COWARD.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: DANAKILLSU

YOU KNOW HOW MUCH SHIT IVE BEEN MODKILLED FOR?

HOW MANY HARMLESS JOKES ENDED IN MY BLOOD?

AND THIS TIME IT WAS SCUMS TURN!? AND YOU SAY "sorry cant fuck over the commies like that"

FINE.

FUCKING FINE.

WELL MAKE OUR OWN JUSTICE.

(I understand your concern, but it is my moderating preference to intervene in the game as little as possible. This is a game between players, not players and a moderator. Yes, modkills are sometimes a nessecary evil to maintain game fairness and balance. In this case, however, a modkill would do nothing for those values - it would merely be a theatrical display of the moderator's power based on a technicality. --AGM)

Fate · Post Post #1893 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:29 pm

SOCIOPATH STOP MOCKING ME FROM THE SAFETY OF YOUR WIFOMLEAKS YOU FUCKIN SCUMBAG

Fate · Post Post #1894 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:31 pm

SO AGM TOMORROW I CAN SAY: "NUKE: WHOEVER" AND THEN SAY JUST KIDDING AFTERWORD, AND IT WONT COUNT?

THATS WHAT YOURE SAYING RIGHT?

(If you make what I believe to a legitimate mistake, apologize, and then retract it in a consecutive post two minutes later ... yes, you will be forgiven. The rules exist to promote fairness and balance, not to be draconian. --AGM)

Fate · Post Post #1895 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:41 pm

OK NOW RIGHT FANCY BLUE SHIT OVER THE POST RIGHT ABOVE THIS ONE.

CAN I PLAY SLAPPYWAGS WITH TECHNACALITIES TOO? AND OPEN A WHOLE CAN OF JUSTICE, JURY, RIGHT AND WRONG, INTENT AND MOTIVATION, JOKE AND SCUMMOVE?

HUH:=?

Fate · Post Post #1896 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:47 pm

Ok just MAKING SURE.

But who is to say, especially since dana SUPPOSEDLY went "Nuke: Jack" to "oh let me go check the rules to see if faking nukes is ok???" in 5seconds flat wasnt SCUM MOTIVATED TO LOOK TOWN AND NOT A MISTAKE?

Do you SEE my issue now? The WIFOMCAN you've unleashed upon us?

Jack · Post Post #1897 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:49 pm

It's fine.

chesskid3 · Post Post #1898 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:53 pm

Jack wrote:It's fine.

Fate · Post Post #1899 (ISO) » Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:55 pm

Well obviously it isn't gonna get redacted or changed or anything that like that now.

I'm just more of a fan of the "hard and fast" rules that I'VE personally been modkilled to time and again because thats what the rules STATE.

Because this way it actually introduces MORE MOD INTERVENTION that what I think was intended, because it is up to AGM

who has knowledge of the setup

to determine what is a "legitimate mistake" and what is a "attempt to gain an unfair advantage of the game state" So now hes actually reading INTO the game and making "motivation"/"intent" calls with knowledge of the setup instead of just BLACK AND WHITE JUSTICE: IF YOU NUKE WITHOUT HAVING ONE YOU DIE.

Thats how I interpreted the rules anyways.

And if you can't see what's wrong with that this then WALP. MOVING ON.

(We're taking this to PM. --AGM)