Concission wrote:VP Baltar wrote:
On what grounds do you think it's random? Why is it a generic question?
On what ground should I think it is not?
Do you never answer questions directly? Jesus. You should not think it's random on the grounds that odds are I'm town and I was trying to generate discussion. On what grounds do you think it's random? Why is it a generic question?
Concission wrote:Your reasoning is very hard not to laugh at. You intend to ask a specific person what their opinions of the Set-Up are then brand that person as town for stating their opinions of the Set-Up? What would you think scum would do, ignore you?
Try to contain yourself. I believe the scum would have been more inclined to sluff the question off with a 'I dunno' instead of trying to help the town. Sure, crypto got it wrong really, but it seemed like an honest effort at least. Certainly doesn't make him confirmed town by any means, but I work by observing and taking note of things.
Concission wrote:Then you go on to call people who are scum-hunting scum because they didn't reply to your question specified to only Crypto.
orly? Where did this happen? Quotes please. Don't ignore this.
Percy wrote:I don't get his vote on Concission, though.
I'll explain since people seem to be missing it. As I said earlier, I feel that Concission is making a mountain out of a molehill. Look at her iso at this point; it's highly concerned with me asking crypto and not everyone my question. I'm also scum for this. P. ridiculous for a townie to actually believe that, imo.
Percy wrote:Still, crypto did say that he thought that the guillotined player didn't have a vote, and VP didn't say boo about it.
Yes, perhaps I should have jumped on him, but it did seem an honest effort even if it was horribly wrong. It's a gut feeling.
LuckayLuck wrote:I agree completely at Shadow Dancer's accusations against Antitown. I read it all the same way. Especially his question of "Please teach me how I should react to a scumclaim." That is such a methodical way of saying it...a mechanical way...a canned way. And we all know what role methodically, mechanically, and canned plays this game.
Baaaaah bahhhhhhhhhh
LuckayLuck wrote:I argue we want the vig, redeemed soul, and tracker to claim at one day before must lynch. (or, if they're about to get lynched)
Even with random shots, they'd probably be dead at that point. If they are claiming to be confirmed, then it's better to do that earlier rather than later. However, I don't think day two is necessarily the day for that to happen.
Ythill wrote:VPB is scum for several reasons, the most important of which are:
1)Aggression in response to a fair question #34.
2)Cognitive dissonance, in that a town-aligned player with his stated views should be more suspicious of crypto by #78.
3)His scummy lean toward voting for the lead wagon in #108.
1) People that ask dumb questions in response to things that are actually trying to get the game moving get my ire.
2) Meh, not necessarily. Read my above post to Percy. crypto explained himself as having had very little sleep by that point. Maybe he's lying, maybe he's not. I'm inclined to think not based upon my feeling from his words.
3) This one is completely ludicrous because I was one of the people actually questioning antitown. See post 87 onward. It's pretty clear that I'm giving AT the benefit of the doubt and trying to get him to explain his Fate stance...as opposed to several people that came later and essentially sheeped onto him.
As far as meta from your game, that's ludicrous. 1) You were the mod of that game and had perfect knowledge of the setup, therefore you may have found that I looked more accurate or whatever in my scumhunting early on because you knew who the scum were. 2) You have not played with me as far as I remember, so you're using half a meta from a single game at best. That's complete bunk and you've been around long enough to know that.
Jarti wrote:Sweet, luck today, alamaster tomorrow and then it's easy mode imo.
What? who the hell are you? Why is luck scum? Why is alamaster scum?
AGM wrote:I've been wanting to play in a game with Percy for a long time just so he could bust out stuff like this and pwnzorz scum.
Meh, see my Percy response.
AGM wrote:I didn't like the Concession attack because even Confession was being dumb, it was clearly noobdumb and not scumdumb.
Add in Percy's tell and it looks like he is scum busy looking for a nice, easy mislynch.
Really? Cause tunneling over something irrelevant is a pretty common noobscum tactic. I assume you think Concission is town, right? As far as the bolded, how is Concission an easy mislynch when no one seemingly agrees with my vote being there?
@Simenon - I've never played with you, but I've always though you were a pretty bright dude. Or at least that is the air you give off. I'm pretty disappointed with your contributions so far and that bothers me a lot. Can I get your comments on Concission, myself and Ythill please?
