![IGMEOU :igmeou:](./images/smilies/icon_igmeou.gif)
Vote count fix'd.
bgg1996 wrote:Around the middle-end of 2009 I played a few games on a rather inexperienced site. A bit after that I played a newbie game on this site as a... Roleblocker? It was a mafia role, I remember. I was about to lose, but I won because the time ran out.Ant_to_the_max wrote:bgg1996 what is your experience playing Mafia?
bgg1996 wrote:Does this mafia even have roles other than regular townies and mafia members?
I meant this game in particular.Xine wrote:bgg1996,
hey there, I was almost convinced that you are indeed a VT (in which case, the "textbook" says to lynch you anyway), but I just couldn't get over these things you said, in this order a few posts apart, no matter which angle I take looking at this the story simply does not add up. discussbgg1996 wrote:Around the middle-end of 2009 I played a few games on a rather inexperienced site. A bit after that I played a newbie game on this site as a... Roleblocker? It was a mafia role, I remember. I was about to lose, but I won because the time ran out.Ant_to_the_max wrote:bgg1996 what is your experience playing Mafia?bgg1996 wrote:Does this mafia even have roles other than regular townies and mafia members?
A long day 1 is great for endgame stuff, but it doesn't always happen.Xine wrote:PS, tell your logic that a long day one makes more info for endgame
Wow, you'd really dislike how I started 1117 thenXine wrote:Nathanael is getting a good amount of attention, I am finding myself a bit hung up on the "back into RVS" that he pulled early in the game, his explanation does not jive with me, because IMO a vote for "No Lynch" is notslightlyscummy.
This could be a connection between him and GreyICE.
Well I wouldn't mind if you shared, sure. What's the juicy tidbit of meta awesomeness that proves that I'm scum?DeathRowKitty wrote:Is it still too early to use meta? If it's not too early, I'm calling GreyICE scum right now. If it is too early....well, I can always wait a couple of pages.
Uhhh...the fact that you're playing differently than you did in the game I've seen you in as town and in the game I just did a brief skim of your iso from in which you were also town?GreyICE wrote:Well I wouldn't mind if you shared, sure. What's the juicy tidbit of meta awesomeness that proves that I'm scum?
Huh, I have no idea what game I was in with you. If it's ongoing just pop a number or something.DeathRowKitty wrote:Uhhh...the fact that you're playing differently than you did in the game I've seen you in as town and in the game I just did a brief skim of your iso from in which you were also town?GreyICE wrote:Well I wouldn't mind if you shared, sure. What's the juicy tidbit of meta awesomeness that proves that I'm scum?
Heh, well then you know how weird games can open if you read 1117. I'd just like to note that 1105 and my newbie game I wasn't at all effective at catching scum and have changed my play somewhat in response (to be fair, I did NOT anticipate Daytalk, a blind spot I am trying to work past). This site metas and plays differently. And 1117, well, you're right I was town, but there is a caveat there that impacted my scumhunting game. Not discussing an ongoing game though.DeathRowKitty wrote:I never said I was in a game with you :s
I read Mini 1105 though (first ever 13p mini normal) and did a quick iso of you in Mini 1117 (ongoing).
to the first part, yes, I joined the Xine wagon for two reasons. first, I thought Grey's case was better than nothing and second I believe there is nothing like a good wagon to get out of RVS. so I "blatantly" wagoned Xine.Neruz wrote:Thus i shall vote Nathanael. I'm not quite sure he's the best lynch for today, but he's shaping up to be a pretty good one and is definitely better than bgg.
Nathanael's voting pattern concerns me. His first three votes are clearly RVS and should be treated as such, but his fourth vote for Xine came in after RVS was mostly over and wasblatantlynothing more than hopping on a wagon.
I'm also disliking his interactions with Hiraki and later DRK; he doesn't appear to actually be responding to questions posed to him so much as trying to deflect them away and his logic in a couple of answers (such as the reason why he feels voting No Lynch in RVS is scummy) is questionable at best.
must have missed the questions. could you please point them out?The deflections are really concerning me, every time i look at Nathanael's ISO i notice more places where instead of answering a quoted question, he deflected it with a question of his own.