In the Court of the Gods (Game Over)

populartajo · Post Post #1625 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:16 am

@DGB, scum could have known there was a traitor, thats not the point of the discussion.

The point of the discussion is YOU CALLING SOLID TOWN READS SCUM for "traitor fishing" when this is not a certainty and avoiding scummy hito for a reason I dont understand.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1626 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:17 am

populartajo wrote:you dont want to comment on hitoscum who blatantly tried to get me modkilled in thread, why?

It's more like you tried to get yourself modkilled.

I'm giving hito the benefit of the doubt. On account of his claim. Is that clear enough???

Stop helping the scum.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1627 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:18 am

populartajo wrote:The point of the discussion is YOU CALLING SOLID TOWN READS SCUM for "traitor fishing" when this is not a certainty and avoiding scummy hito for a reason I dont understand.

I know it's not a certainty, but it's high probability.

populartajo · Post Post #1628 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:19 am

Andrius wrote:I have reads. They coincide with DGBs on the most part.
We have an entire conversation/ War Room chat going down in my Devotional, so that is the focus of my attention.

I read SpyreX as scum.
What happened?
He died.
I have my reads, and unlike you I make sure they are tested. The benefits of actually using the Devotional with DGB.

@ DTM: Clearly you don't get what "cherry pits" refer to.

so Andrius you also think Equinox/Feysal/hito are scum for traitorfishing?

Andrius · Post Post #1629 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:20 am

Feysal, Equinox, hito.
In that order.
If I could lay out how the bodies would hit the floor, that's how they'd look. (Only using the names you gave me, if I had free reign, you'd be there too.)

populartajo · Post Post #1630 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:20 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
populartajo wrote:The point of the discussion is YOU CALLING SOLID TOWN READS SCUM for "traitor fishing" when this is not a certainty and avoiding scummy hito for a reason I dont understand.

I know it's not a certainty, but it's high probability.

What evidence do you have to support this hypothesis?

populartajo · Post Post #1631 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:20 am

Andrius wrote:Feysal, Equinox, hito.
In that order.
If I could lay out how the bodies would hit the floor, that's how they'd look. (Only using the names you gave me, if I had free reign, you'd be there too.)

DGB thinks now that Im town.

Thoughts?

populartajo · Post Post #1632 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:21 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
populartajo wrote:you dont want to comment on hitoscum who blatantly tried to get me modkilled in thread, why?

It's more like you tried to get yourself modkilled.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1633 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:25 am

populartajo wrote: What evidence do you have to support this hypothesis?

I think it's highly likely that the scum knew they had a traitor around, explaining Feysal and Equinox's bizarre greetings in early game. It's not guaranteed. But I think it's highly likely. The evidence is all the games where scum knew they had a traitor, and those where scum didn't know.

I'm repeating myself now. Read my old posts.

Equinox · Post Post #1634 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:26 am

I have two very simple questions while I catch up on this thread explosion.

1.

Andrius and DrippingGoofball

: You mentioned earlier that you have 200+ QuickTopic posts. Who is leading the discussion? I need BOTH of you to answer.
2.

DrippingGoofball

: Traitor communication. One-way or two-way street?

I do not care if you think I am scum. I want these answers.

populartajo · Post Post #1635 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:29 am

okay two more questions and I should get back to work,

1. if you think hito is town, then why was he in the DUSTY PLAYERS section of your "traitorfishing" analysis (iso 180)?

2. do you sincerely think all scum traitor fished? Scum have daytalk, wouldnt it be enough to just have one member do the dirty job?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1636 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:30 am

Equinox wrote:1.
Andrius and DrippingGoofball
: You mentioned earlier that you have 200+ QuickTopic posts. Who is leading the discussion? I need BOTH of you to answer.

Both of us. Indistinguishable.

Equinox wrote:2.
DrippingGoofball
: Traitor communication. One-way or two-way street?

Two way. Mostly to establish identity. Beyond that, probably little communication if at all.

Equinox · Post Post #1637 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:32 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
Equinox wrote:2.
DrippingGoofball
: Traitor communication. One-way or two-way street?

Two way. Mostly to establish identity. Beyond that, probably little communication if at all.

Show me where SpyreX communicated to either Equinox or Feysal, then. You are blowing a lot of hot air when I know your allegations (against me, at the very least) to be false.

Andrius · Post Post #1638 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:32 am

We're fairly equal in-QT; no one really "leads" discussion as we're fairly equal on posts and responses.

Tajo, your brains need to be splattered with a coconut.
You're town enough... for now.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1639 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:34 am

populartajo wrote:2. do you sincerely think all scum traitor fished? Scum have daytalk, wouldnt it be enough to just have one member do the dirty job?

Yes. Because it's too hard to telegraph to the Traitor "Hey SpyreX, I'm scum, tajo is scum, and Equinox is scum, we are your buddies." But a message like "I know most of the people on my team of followers, but not all, but I'll get to know them better soon" is rather inconspicuous, UNLESS YOU ARE LOOKING FOR SOMETHING.

Tajo, check QT. I have to leave - will be back in a couple of hours.

Andrius · Post Post #1640 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:36 am

I'm heading out too; need to cram for a test that I've been putting off far too long.

Cheerio!

Andrius · Post Post #1641 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:37 am

Oh hey, p.s.
If all scumteam members telegraph the Traitor, it'll be more likely picked up than if one person does it.

I Bake. I can't receive that well. So the more apparent the easier it is. xD

Benmage · Post Post #1642 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:37 am

This traitor subtle communication is something I'll have to review more of.

But its still Jack today, hito tomorrow....right?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #1643 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:39 am

Equinox wrote:Show me where SpyreX communicated to either Equinox or Feysal, then. You are blowing a lot of hot air when I know your allegations (against me, at the very least) to be false.

I already showed where SpyreX was breadcrumbing his Traitor qualities. Look at my older posts.

SpyreX did not communicate with Equinox or Feysal directly. He did communicate directly with NS, and indirectly with Jack.

Benmage · Post Post #1644 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:42 am

How could he communicate directly with NS?

zoraster · Post Post #1645 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:43 am

Day 2 Vote Count

Andrius ( 1 ) Jack,

(L - 7 )

populartajo ( 0 )

(L - 8 )

hitogoroshi ( 4 ) Lost Butterfly populartajo, Feysal, farside22,

(L - 4 )

nopointinactingup ( 0 )

(L - 8 )

Equinox ( 0 )

(L - 8 )

farside22 ( 0 )

(L - 8 )

Feysal ( 1 ) hitogoroshi,

(L - 7 )

Lost Butterfly ( 0 )

(L - 8 )

Corvuus ( 1 ) DTMaster,

(L - 7 )

Benmage ( 0 )

(L - 8 )

*** Jack ( 7 ) ***

DrippingGoofball,

Andrius, nopointinactingup, Equinox, Benmage, Corvuus,

Fishythefish,

(L - 1 )

DTMaster ( 0 )

(L - 8 )

No Lynch ( 0 )

(L - 8 )

Not Voting ( 1 )

Nobody Special,

Total Votes ( 15 )

Deadline: March 7th at 23:00 EDT
With 15 able to vote, 8 needed to lynch.

Searching for a replacement for Jack. I've never known Jack to flake before, so I imagine it's something out of his control. That being so, hopefully he comes back before I can find a replacement.

Equinox · Post Post #1646 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:49 am

I don't know about you guys, but I want that hammer to drop. Forcing a replacement to claim and then hammering sounds cruel to me, and I highly doubt Jack's slot has anything to say in its defense.

Benmage · Post Post #1647 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:51 am

I just want to hear a claim incase we are killing town info...I doubt I believe any claim..and will encourage a hammer after said claim. But if there is town info we can use it after his death.

Can I plead some buddies to replace in and explain the scenario to them mod?

zoraster · Post Post #1648 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:57 am

Benmage wrote:I just want to hear a claim incase we are killing town info...I doubt I believe any claim..and will encourage a hammer after said claim. But if there is town info we can use it after his death.

Can I plead some buddies to replace in and explain the scenario to them mod?

After some serious consideration and as much as I'd like to say otherwise, I have to say no to this. You're more than welcome to ask friends to replace in, of course. But to explain to them the situation out of the thread opens a lot of doors I'd like to leave closed.

Equinox · Post Post #1649 (ISO) » Mon Feb 28, 2011 10:05 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:SpyreX did not communicate with Equinox or Feysal directly. He did communicate directly with NS, and indirectly with Jack.

That would be because SpyreX had nothing to do with either Equinox or Feysal. I know I am town and thus have nothing to do with him. I strongly feel Feysal is town due to wagon analysis; I looked at the circumstances again earlier today and still believe this to be the case. Again, seeing things that are not there.

(The real purpose of this post was to bump. So.)