AGar wrote:Semantics = "It's not OMGUS, because this is why I did it!" You're twisting the definition of a word or phrase (in this case, OMGUS) to your liking.
Horse shit.
http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Omgus
The wiki wrote:shorthand to indicate that you are voting for someone
primarily because they voted for you.
I WASN'T VOTING FOR EXILON PRIMARILY BECAUSE HE VOTED FOR ME. THEREFORE IT ISN'T OMGUS. YOU LOSE.
AGar wrote:I'm liking the EA wagon, especially his latest OMGUS against TP.
I SWEAR TO GOD, AGAR.
THAT. IS. NOT. FUCKING. OMGUS. EITHER.
NOW QUIT BEING A DUMBASS.
Exilon wrote:So you're saying my random-voting stage vote needs to be NOT random?
No. wtf, where did you get the idea that I said that? Other people cast blatantly random votes and I didn't attack them.
Exilon wrote:So you're saying I called Ythan scum based on this QUESTION, BEFORE he even posted:
So Ythan, you're scum this time, yes?
Uh... duh? "So Ythan, you're scum this time" is blatantly calling someone scum. The "yes?" on the end doesn't change that, because you're not asking Ythan if he is scum, you are calling him scum and then asking him for confirmation.
Exilon wrote:Erratus wrote:YOU TOLD ICENINJA YOU WOULD POST A COUPLE TIMES A DAY. THIS IS YOUR EIGHTH POST IN TWENTY FOUR HOURS. DID YOU LIE TO COVER YOUR TRACKS FOR LATER SCUM LURKING?
Or did you just not have a good idea of how often you were actually going to post?
Are you serious?
The last sentence is serious, the caps lock was just showing how silly it was to take the answers to ICE's questions as anything more than a vague guideline.
Exilon wrote:Erratus wrote:Let's walk through what just happened here. I put the FIRST vote on penpen, and I put the FIRST vote on Exilon. Plaguey here somehow comes to the conclusion that this constitutes "ultra-quick wagoning", while ignoring all the people who are, y'know, ACTUALLY WAGONING. Then he puts the FIFTH vote on me, with no hint of reservation. Does this sound like someone who honestly believes that quick wagoning is scummy?
Why are you getting so worked up for?
Cause I got me a scumbag.
Exilon wrote:Erratus wrote:Bullshit! Two FoS's is obviously not spamming. Why are you distorting the facts so terribly?
That's YOUR opinion, not HIS
No, actually these aren't anyone's opinions.
These are facts.
I FoS'd twice. That is a FACT. It is normal for townies to have two FoS's out. That is a FACT. TRY AGAIN
theplague42 wrote:Sound familiar? I'm not distorting facts. You directly said you wanted to start a bandwagon. Or are you just distorting facts?
I said I wanted to start a bandwagon. Wanted. Did I actually start one? I guess if you count Maemuki's random vote as a wagon, but really, no, I didn't start a wagon. Regardless, the problem with your attack on me isn't that you voted me for wanting to start a wagon, it's that you did so
while ignoring the people who actually were wagoning
.
theplague42 wrote:Generally, I believe that people who react like that are generally scum. It's the same as a guilty person calling a lawyer, while an innocent person shouldn't have to.
Yeah, cause your average innocent person understands the complex legal system perfectly.
Oh wait, no they don't! Your comparison is fucking stupid, bro. What the hell does anything I said have to do with calling a lawyer anyways?
theplague42 wrote:FoS's are ways to put suspicion on someone without actually being committal about it.
Okay then genius, how would a townie attack their top three suspects?
Seriously people. He isn't even attacking me because he thinks either of my FoS's are based on craplogic. He is attacking me
because I used FoS's
. That ain't scumhunting, that's attacking my playstyle. HE IS SCUM.
theplague42 wrote:By voting for one person and putting FoS's on two others, you're spreading suspicion around as much as possible and trying to create town-on-town arguments.
OH LOL
HE JUST ADMITTED MY ARGUMENTS AGAINST FATSO AND MAEMUKI ARE TOWN ON TOWN
LYNCH TIME PLEASE