Open 289 - Hard Boiled - Game over.
-
-
Ythan SheWelcome to the HaystackShe
- Welcome to the Haystack
- Welcome to the Haystack
- Posts: 15167
- Joined: August 11, 2009
- Pronoun: She
-
-
Umbrage Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3381
- Joined: November 13, 2010
Call it whatever you want, it's scummy. Think about it. He know CS is town from page one.AbelCain wrote:Chainsaw is null unless you can prove that CS is scum (or if you can show that both CS and Snake are defending each other). I'm not saying that there isn't any chainsaw going on, but it's difficult to prove that he's attacking you to defend CS rather than just attacking you for scummy behavior.
I already answered that. I didn't know why CS was asking me to give reads. I had three choices.AbelCain wrote:Well, you couldn't decide on whether or not you voted for CS for a serious reason or if you voted for him just to bait people into defending him. You also can't decide on why you think CS asked you the question (if he had a make-you-look-bad motive, you wouldn't have dropped your case on him so easily). Still, it seems you flip-flopped a lot less than my memory has led me to believe, or else I'm just not noticing it in your ISO.
1: Say I didn't have any good reads, and look stupid, maybe even scummy.
2: Make up some weak page one reads and end up eating my words later in the game, looking scummy.
3: Call CS out as scum, get us out of RVS, and maybe catch some scum along the way.
I still think I made the right call.
Yeah, I noticed your vote was on me. Mind explaining why?Ythan wrote:Krazy, Umbrage is not being run up because of the hysterics.I'll explain it to you. You have to get someone else to understand it for you.-
-
Ythan SheWelcome to the HaystackShe
- Welcome to the Haystack
- Welcome to the Haystack
- Posts: 15167
- Joined: August 11, 2009
- Pronoun: She
-
-
implosion he/himPolymathhe/him
- Polymath
- Polymath
- Posts: 14771
- Joined: September 9, 2010
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: zoraster's wine cellar
-
-
iamausername Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4843
- Joined: March 28, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Ythan SheWelcome to the HaystackShe
- Welcome to the Haystack
- Welcome to the Haystack
- Posts: 15167
- Joined: August 11, 2009
- Pronoun: She
-
-
iamausername Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4843
- Joined: March 28, 2008
- Location: England
-
-
Krazy Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7079
- Joined: January 28, 2011
-
-
Ythan SheWelcome to the HaystackShe
- Welcome to the Haystack
- Welcome to the Haystack
- Posts: 15167
- Joined: August 11, 2009
- Pronoun: She
-
-
Quaroath Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1659
- Joined: February 18, 2011
- Location: Salem, Or
-
-
Umbrage Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3381
- Joined: November 13, 2010
Is that what you meant? I'm not really sure what to make of Xtoxm. I've never seen anyone handle RVS that way before. I wanted to make a note of it, if he suddenly came back and started bandwagoning, it would look really bad. I thought about what would happen if I brought it up, since someone was sure to wonder why I had. I figured that paranoid or opportunistic scum would likely accuse me of attacking him, or he might freak out, so I was sure to make my note of him absolutely neutral, and see what happened next. Thinking back, it does seem like a strange thing to do, but once I thought of it, I was blinded by my own cleverness and had to do it, if that makes sense. I just couldn't resist.Ythan wrote:So the reason that you singled out that xtoxm (going to call this guy tom from here on out so I don't have to think about the x's every time I type his name) post was to look for reactions? Why that post? Why the way you did it? I want your thought process going into that comment.I'll explain it to you. You have to get someone else to understand it for you.-
-
DarthYoshi I am your Father
- I am your Father
- I am your Father
- Posts: 1965
- Joined: December 24, 2010
- Location: Washington State, USA
Wow, you people talk a lot.
Why not both?Krazy:AKA: ur a hypocrite, but also tl;dr. Usually you can make one criticism or the other, Darth, not both
Krazy:but I also encourage you to actually back up your accusation.
Do you really want me to compile a list of every single player who saw the irony in you making a tunneling accusation?
Krazy:tl;dr is anti-town too.
Tl:dr had less to do with it. I didn’t read those posts because I like feeling happy about life.
Krazy:Should we have a "who can be more anti-town" contest?
No. I’m pretty sure you’d kick my ass.
My motives for voting you also included the tunneling on Ythan (including, at that point, no desire to scumhunt on anyone else) as well as suggesting a policy lynch for no reason at the outset of D1. All in all, very anti-town play.Krazy:but is your case ever going to be anything other than tl;dr?
Krazy:How about this Darth: Instead of QQing about my quote war with him, why don't you ask him a few more questions yourself? Again, both you and Ythan can QQ about me "tunneling" on him, but that doesn't excuse you from not engaging him at all.
I did. I asked him when we could expect non-Krazy related content from him, and he basically shrugged off the question. Which I didn’t like. I’m paying attention to everyone, not just you.
All of that being said—I actually am liking your attempts to scumhunt on the lurkers, and I wouldn’t be surprised at all if there is a scum or two there, just hanging out while the town points fingers at one another. Your responses to me are such that I am fine with my vote remaining where it is for the time being, however.
@Xtoxm—what about Ythan’s exchange looked complacent for him? I don’t know what ‘complacent’ Ythan looks like versus ‘not complacent’ Ythan. Also, thoughts on the Umbrage wagon, pleeze.
@Ythan--do you have any suspects after Umbrage? If so, who and why?
@Umbrage—I have a couple problems with your #159. First, if your case on Snake Eyes is “getting stronger,” then why is your vote on TBL and not Snake Eyes?
Also,
Emphasis mine.When Snake Eyes attacked me, he did so under the assumption that CS is town, an assumption I see no basis for, andfor which he has provided none.
Snake's #134:
Did you just miss this or what? What do you think of this response?in a way that was likely to bring attention to him. There's little scum motivation to do so, but there is a pretty clear town motive.
In other news…
^This. Once LurkerUsername explains why he thinks I don’t look like town, I’ll be happy to respond.Krazy:Would you please explain why he does not?
And as a parting shot, this thread needs more Xotxm, TBL, Quaraoth, and Iamausername.On hiatus from any new mafia commitments.
Jesus loves you. But that doesn't mean you're town.
James 2:13-
-
Vordark Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 211
- Joined: February 11, 2011
I read this as an answer. What sort of answer were you looking for here?Ythan wrote:
I think Snake's question here was valid, but no answer.Umbrage wrote:
Well, my questioning ConSpiracy's motives could only help move the game forward, so what's the problem?Snake Eyes wrote:I don't understand why you would immediately assume ConSpiracy had some ulterior motives, as asking questions in early game can only help move the game forward.
This seems to indicate that who attacks or defends a person showing non-scummy behavior isn't useful. Can you explain what you meant by this?Ythan wrote:Umbrage wrote:When I voted ConSpiracy, I made sure to let everyone know it was a serious vote. I was setting myself up as bait, and you bit.
Two explanatory posts for the xtoxm comment, I want these to be easy to find so I'm including them here. I find it odd that you say you wanted to see who would attack or defend him when you said you didn't find his behavior scummy in the first place. Also, the vote on Con was the same thing? That seemed different. It was an actual attack, wasn't it?Umbrage wrote:I threw out that bit about xtoxm because I wanted to see who would either attack him, or come to his aid. Snake did the latter. Same basic principle with the vote on you.-
-
Umbrage Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3381
- Joined: November 13, 2010
Because I think it'll do more good on TBL. Maybe get him to actually post some content. I know how scummy Snake Eyes is, I want to know how scummy TBL is.DarthYoshi wrote:I have a couple problems with your #159. First, if your case on Snake Eyes is “getting stronger,” then why is your vote on TBL and not Snake Eyes?I'll explain it to you. You have to get someone else to understand it for you.-
-
ConSpiracy Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1640
- Joined: October 31, 2010
Well, I thought that, because you didn't want to participate in the RVS.Ythan wrote:
It's how the game naturally starts. Do you think I have a problem with it?ConSpiracy wrote:@ YthanThough I don't really like the RVS myself, don't you think there has to be one? I have played one game without a RVS and it started very lurky. The RVS starts discussion.
Why didn't you random vote then?
I must say I already lost interest in this game due to the huge walls about Umbrage and the fight between Ythan and Krazy and I skipped most of the last 3/4 pages. I will have a reread this weekend and maybe earlier, but it is very boring to get through these long arguments just to find something worth noting. Please stop the bickering about useless things.If somebody has tools to fix my scumdar, pm me.-
-
Krazy Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7079
- Joined: January 28, 2011
Darth, I'm going to let most of your comments stand, and your questions seemed rhetorical (the one maybe not being the "why not both?" and if you actually wanted to discuss that let me know). I'm heading to class now and will re-read the other posts from this morning once I get back.vote conspiracy-
-
Snake Eyes Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 47
- Joined: February 7, 2011
More accurate would be a misrepresentation, as usual. Here's the quote in context, pay attention to bolds:Umbrage wrote:Snake Eyes wrote:The vote and my scumread on you came at different times.
^ the technical psychological term for the bolded is A SCUM SLIP.Snake Eyes wrote:It's less scummy to join a bandwagonon someone I don't have a scumread on, than it is to pressure you after you've made a questionable post, and then push a wagon on you when I do have a scumread on you?
In other words, I say I don't find CS scummy, that I find your post worth pursuing, and later find you scummy. Which is, shockingly, what I've been saying all along.Snake Eyes wrote:
It's less scummy toUmbrage wrote:If you think a bandwagon is the best way to get out of RVS,then why not vote ConSpiracy with me? Even if you think he's town, it doesn't matter. It's just a wagon, and it gets us out of RVS. Unless you think that your page 2 reads are going to hold for the rest of the game, I see no reason why you wouldn't want to bandwagon him. It'd be a hell of a lot easier than wagoning me. But you weren't interested in a wagon to leave RVS, you wanted a wagon that would grow, and maybe turn into a lynch. And that is scummy.join a bandwagon on someone I don't have a scumread on, than it is to pressure you after you've made a questionable post, and then push a wagon on you when I do have a scumread on you? Also, it's hard to wagon you, yet I want a wagon that would grow to a lynch? How does this make any sense?
His over the top hysterics were giving me pause as well, as stuff like that is much more common on town than scum. On the other hand, some people just play more aggressively and emotionally, and after taking a quick ISO skim at some of the other games he's played, his yelling at the screen here is not an isolated incident. In Mini 1108 he did it as scum and in Mini 1102 he did it as town. So I'm viewing it as a null-tell in this case.Krazy wrote:Umbrage seems to be losing it but I still fail to see how his hysterics translates into scumplay. Insofar as he has been hysterical, it's difficult saying one player has been scummier than another in joining the wagon on him, since most are making good criticisms of him. However, it seems probable that at least one person on the Umbrage wagon is scum. Even if Umbrage is scum himself, his position in this game could lead to early wagoning, however I do not currently believe that to be the case. But since there so much room to make compelling criticism of Umbrage, I don't think any scum player has needed to stretch themselves to join the wagon. I will probably re-read the wagon on him once more people have caught up on the game or there is a flip. Continuing to grill Umbrage only makes it easier for lurkers to join the wagon on him when they do return to the game.
Also, I think your assumption that there's scum on the wagon is a bit premature, as there's no way to know if Umbrage is town. I'd even say that given how scummy Umbrage looks, this wagon could have grown a lot faster, if Umbrage was actually town. It would be very easy for scum to add their votes to the Umbrage wagon, if he's town.
Might move my vote around soonish if the lurkers don't start contributing. Xtoxm and TBL in particular, who are both clearly reading the thread, but have said hardly anything.-
-
Umbrage Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3381
- Joined: November 13, 2010
That's what you've been saying. But it's not what you were thinking.Snake Eyes wrote:In other words, I say I don't find CS scummy, that I find your post worth pursuing, and later find you scummy. Which is, shockingly, what I've been saying all along.
But that's what you claim you DID do! You joined a bandwagon on someone you didn't have a scumread on, or so you say. So why would you say that?Snake Eyes wrote:It's less scummy to join a bandwagon on someone I don't have a scumread on,
AND DON'T USE THAT FUCKING RIVERTOWN GAME AS META, THE PLAYERS THERE WERE SMOKING SHIT AND I WAS THE ONLY RATIONAL HUMAN BEING IN THE GAME.
Snake Eyes wrote:Also, I think your assumption that there's scum on the wagon is a bit premature, as there's no way to know if Umbrage is town. I'd even say that given how scummy Umbrage looks, this wagon could have grown a lot faster, if Umbrage was actually town. It would be very easy for scum to add their votes to the Umbrage wagon, if he's town.
iamausernameUnofficial Vote Count wrote:Xtoxm - 0
Krazy - 1 (Abelcain)
Umbrage - 5 (iamausername, ConSpiracy, Snake Eyes, Vordark, Ythan)
Ythan - 0
ConSpiracy - 1 (DarthYoshi)
TheBigLebowski - 1 (Krazy)
Snake Eyes - 1 (Umbrage)
Vordark - 1 (TheBigLebowski)
Quaroath - 0
Abelcain - 0
iamausername - 0
DarthYoshi - 1 (Quaroath)
No lynch - 0
Not voting: Xtoxm.
With 12 alive, 7 votes are required to lynch.
ConSpiracy
Vordark
Ythan
You really think there isn't scum on my wagon? Do you mean then that each of the above is town? I asked you why you thought ConSpiracy was town a GAZILLION TIMES, and I still have not gotten an answer. WHY ARE THESE PEOPLE YOUR TOWN READS?I'll explain it to you. You have to get someone else to understand it for you.-
-
DarthYoshi I am your Father
- I am your Father
- I am your Father
- Posts: 1965
- Joined: December 24, 2010
- Location: Washington State, USA
-
-
DarthYoshi I am your Father
- I am your Father
- I am your Father
- Posts: 1965
- Joined: December 24, 2010
- Location: Washington State, USA
-
-
Abelcain Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 142
- Joined: October 13, 2010
@iamausername: You need to postreasonsand have more to contribute than just direct answers to questions posed to you. Get in the game.
Quaroath's last two posts have been placed only to avoid getting prodded and have contained no content. I think he needs some encouragement.Quaroath wrote:prod avoidance, just finished a 44 hours work weekend fri-sun, will catch up/post when conscious in morning.
Unvote
Vote: Quaroath
This sounds like you've already decided that TBL is scum with so little content from him.Umbrage wrote:I know how scummy Snake Eyes is, I want to know how scummy TBL is.
Having a scumread =/= necessarily thinking you're scummy. If someone did something really scummy once, but otherwise you felt like they were town, you'd have a scum read on them for the scummy thing but you'd still have town read overall.Umbrage wrote:But that's what you claim you DID do! You joined a bandwagon on someone you didn't have a scumread on, or so you say. So why would you say that?
It's nice to know that you get like this just about any time people don't give as much weight to your arguments as you think they deserve.Umbrage wrote:AND DON'T USE THAT FUCKING RIVERTOWN GAME AS META, THE PLAYERS THERE WERE SMOKING SHIT AND I WAS THE ONLY RATIONAL HUMAN BEING IN THE GAME.
Another post later tonight or tomorrow, I have class now and the professor checks to make sure we're doing our work on our computers."We're killing Abel, he is - by far - the town with the most brain cells rattling around in his noggin. It will be happytime awesome dance to have him dead and gone." -Thor665-
-
Ythan SheWelcome to the HaystackShe
- Welcome to the Haystack
- Welcome to the Haystack
- Posts: 15167
- Joined: August 11, 2009
- Pronoun: She
Not exactly. I have no outstanding questions that have not been satisfactorily answered. I started my individual rereads pretty early in the game, and Umbrage was the only one who stuck out at me. I'm not particularly alarmed by anything going on at the moment from other players, at least not from a scummy-suspicion point of view.DarthYoshi wrote:@Ythan--do you have any suspects after Umbrage? If so, who and why?-
-
Ythan SheWelcome to the HaystackShe
- Welcome to the Haystack
- Welcome to the Haystack
- Posts: 15167
- Joined: August 11, 2009
- Pronoun: She
It's not an answer, it's just turning the question back on the questioner.Vordark wrote:I read this as an answer. What sort of answer were you looking for here?
He said he wanted to see who would attack or defend the point, but he had not made an accusation. I can see the "Will someone attack him for this thing I said" side, although is itself a whole other can of worms, but the defense side not at all.This seems to indicate that who attacks or defends a person showing non-scummy behavior isn't useful. Can you explain what you meant by this?
It's like voting. Real world voting. The RVS stage produces content for me or other players to analyze, but me doing it myself isn't going to make much of a difference. It gets the game moving but if one or two players doesn't place a random vote it doesn't make a difference in my mind.ConSpiracy wrote:Well, I thought that, because you didn't want to participate in the RVS.
Why didn't you random vote then?-
-
Krazy Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7079
- Joined: January 28, 2011
Rereading a couple isos. I have to agree with Ythan that V's #62 is annoying, both to read and to reread.
CS says he gets bored of the Umbrage discussion because of the wall posts and also gets bored of my exchange with Ythan; like Darth, basically gives a tl;dr, UNLIKE Darth, goes on to imply that Umbrage et.al is also tl;dr.
I also notice that CS's interest in the game basically seems to drop off simultaneously with V unvoting him.
@CS: Aside from the Umbrage wagon you helped form and then got bored of, I'm not really sure I at this point can characterize you as not also active lurking. Among the Umbrage wagon, if I were to guess that there was someone scum on it (which there is, admittedly, no guarantee), you would be my first guess.
Parts of this post have bothered me for a while, but moreso now that he seems to have ceased actively pursuing the Umbrage wagon:
ConSpiracy wrote: Think further
Great, post. Are you going to point out things that are scummy or only things that you see as null?Umbrage wrote:OK, so my vote on ConSpiracy is about as serious as you can get for page 1 reads. Xtoxm stands out as odd to me, he didn't random vote, he didn't really say hello or anything, he just answered the questions. I'm not saying it's scum or town, it just looks odd.
"think further" = make my case for me?
"Great, post. Are you going to point out things that are scummy or only things that you see as null?"
--> Although players should point out scummy behavior, observing false-positives and asserting them as null is still a position to take and a contribution to the town (although whether that's actually what was going on here is debateable).
I would test my theory that CS's interest in the game is directly proportional to the number of votes on him, but I haven't quite gotten all I want out of my vote on TBL yet.vote conspiracy-
-
Umbrage Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3381
- Joined: November 13, 2010
Active lurking is scummy, no matter how you shake it. But how deep does the rabbit hole go?Abelcain wrote:This sounds like you've already decided that TBL is scum with so little content from him.
What is this I don't evenAbelcain wrote:Having a scumread =/= necessarily thinking you're scummy.
Um, yeah, that's totally what I did.Ythan wrote:--> Although players should point out scummy behavior, observing false-positives and asserting them as null is still a position to take and a contribution to the town (although whether that's actually what was going on here is debateable).I'll explain it to you. You have to get someone else to understand it for you.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.