Can u please tell me the post number of the question that u asked me. Cos I fail to see what u are onlewarcher82 wrote:this stall is extremely weird.
@Empking: please, comment on my catch-up wall.
@wiz&aaah: again: I asked you to be precise about your FoS's, and to explain your contraddictory statements about the players who should be my mafia partners. Since your biggest arguments against me are based on my (vatesi's) interaction with other players, it is a crucial and legitimate question to ask.Again, you are both ignoring me.
@singersigner: I have opened aaah400's meta. I cannot but see a difference between the two games. A difference consisting in the way he has been spreading FoS's everywhere in this game. In the game in which he is town, he over-reacted against any attack, but by no means did he attack everyone around at the same time and above all he did answer the questions he was asked. Here he is ignoring all the questions he is asked. It may be difficut to distinguish a bad town player from a bad town player, but I am still convinced that aaah400 belongs to the first category.
However, tonight I will check the meta again, but what I read so far did not bother my reading of him.All in all, at the moment there are two lynches I would support: aaah400 and wiz. Singer's lynch may be informative about aaah, but:
1) I don't need much more information to say aaah is scum
2) we cannot afford informative lynches in pseudo-lylo.
Moreover, as high as singer is in my priority list (3rd at the moment), I find wiz scummier every word he posts and I am not willing to vote and lynch a player (singer) who, at least, is being active instead of dodging questions.
Please answer my question here as well. You may have missed it.singersigner wrote:Lewarcher, I'm gone all day today, but when I get back sometime around midnight MST, I'll compare his ISOs from the two games and see if I can see the difference you pointed out.
This stall IS really weird. I know I haven't been the most active poster, but geez...
LOL, Are u FUCKING WITH ME?lewarcher82 wrote:@wiz: I am never desperate, don't worry. In fact, I am discussing content, which is what you, andrew and aaah400 are refusing to do (possibly for different reasons). You need to address my points if you want to contest my readings. You cannot just post general random observations. On lylo, one must do more than what you are doing. Answer this:
1) is my description of aaah400's scummy strategy inaccurate? And if so, how and why?
2) is my feeling about singer's activity wrong? If so, why?
3) is my definition of your posts as "filler" and "bad posting" questionable? If so, how and why?
4) on your post 224 (apologies, but it does not look like a ground-breaking post to me): it was pointed out how unrealistic it is for a scum team to put someone at L-1 and then quick-hammer. I think wasn't the only one observing this. Please comment on it, and don't repeat the easy version of the story, over and over again.
Refer to the ISO of the players I have mentioned and provide arguments. Refusal to debate is a huge scumtell in a lylo or near-lylo situation.
oh bugger. I saw it but forgot to respond for some reason. Bookmarking to remind me to do this when I get home.ToastyToast wrote:Please answer my question here as well. You may have missed it.singersigner wrote:Lewarcher, I'm gone all day today, but when I get back sometime around midnight MST, I'll compare his ISOs from the two games and see if I can see the difference you pointed out.
This stall IS really weird. I know I haven't been the most active poster, but geez...