Calcifer wrote:Friend wrote:So guys, which is better - trying to defend myself and getting shot down mercilessly by the asshole-ish nature of Calcifer, or simply doing nothing and letting myself get lynched anyways? Either way I feel like my lynching is gonna be a hell of an "I-told-you-so" moment for town and might sway this game. I'm totally fine with getting lynched.
So, this is more evidence Friend is scum.
The correct town answer is "scumhunt". Not defend yourself, not lurk your way out of getting lynched.
Nuts. I was multi-day ninjaed! I was going to post: ChooseAThirdOption (aka, you could hunt scum)
Friend wrote:Yeah, but when I try to scumhunt you criticize my style. What's the point?
If you are town, then keep trying. If you are scum, give up now.
silverbullet999 wrote:-nhammen
I'm thinkin on that.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Explain what about Wraith's quote was "scummy as hell"
You do realize I asked this a couple pages ago and have since been constantly ignored about it... right?
Good point. Hey, Friend! You could also try answering questions that people ask you, instead of ignoring them.
TwoHeadedBoy wrote:nhammen wrote:Did you really have to make sure we knew that you found Grey's vote to be a nulltell? Why?
Because town and scum alike vote NL as a way of getting out of RVS (someone votes them for voting NL, and then other people vote THOSE people...). It was worth a mention that Grey's vote was indeed a nulltell. It was the only thing that really stuck out at the time, so I brought it up. I'm more curious as to why you're asking why I'm giving my reads - more information helps the town, does it not?
I'm actually asking why you gave that as a read, but had no other reads. If you would have answered both questions that I had asked instead of just that one, you would have realized this from the context.
TwoHeadedBoy wrote:In addition, concerning Post 158/ISO 4 of mine, is the why addressed to:
Why my vote would do better on Pine? I still find him suspicious and there were more votes on him and more support for a lynch than on C-Worl. I enjoy placing my vote where it has more importance, especially if I'm deciding between two people I find scummy.
Why I said it was too stupid to be scummy? I'll quote it for you and you can read it yourself:
No need for the quote. I was asking why your vote was on Pine. You mentioned him multiple times, but never mentioned any suspicions of him before that post. And you did not give reasons in that post either.
IceyCupcake wrote:And before anyone yells meta, it's personality again. Emp is a very forceful personality who loves to be right, and either isn't easily intimidated or fakes it reasonably well.
He's also as linear as some of my newbies in newbie games. No way in hell does he not have long lectures for us on why his terrible reads are right. I mean they'll still be terrible, but as town he always has convoluted explanations of why he's right. As scum, I'd expect a hell of a lot more like this.
Bad Emp, no treats for you!
Bad meta attack. Do you have examples of scum games where he has played this differently?
Pine wrote:View Parama's posts in isolation. He's done practically nothing but lodge votes with poor or no reasoning and tear down the efforts of people scumhunting. Lurking/sniping/counterproductivity.
UNVOTE: C-Worl (The case against him's gotten stale anyway)
VOTE: Parama
Parama wrote:Welcome to my large game meta, Pine. I suggest you dealwithitdog.jpg.
Bad meta defense. Why is this your large game meta? If people complain about lack of content from you, saying deal with it doesn't seem like a pro-town attitude.
-----bottom of page 14-----