Metropolis: Revisited [Game Over]

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #400 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:31 pm

Eight more plz

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #401 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:32 pm

AlmasterGM wrote:
Vote: DGB
. Will probably be a strike once I finish reading.

Stop wasting time, do it.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #402 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:34 pm

camn wrote:I'm gathering data from this DGB-wagon.

You're the only thing I'll miss about this game.

Just do the strike, camn. I'm sure you'll know exactly how to interpret my wagon.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #403 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:35 pm

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #404 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:37 pm

Albert B. Rampage wrote:[/img]stupid image[/img]

Oh, just quit it with the preaching.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #405 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:39 pm

What is the matter?

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #406 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:48 pm

It's OK when you call others scum but when someone legitimately attacks you, you get upset. You disappoint me.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #407 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:48 pm

Albert B. Rampage wrote:What is the matter?

You made a smash-up case, with urls to all kinds of meta-scum-this, meta-town-that, blah blah blah, but I can't defend myself against meta arguments. No one can, really.

And since I'm just vanilla, I'm not hugely motivated to fight you. I have had run ins with you before and they were memorably unpleasant. I'm not going through this again. It's an ugly spectacle to watch, too.

You can lynch me, and gather information from my lynch.

It's the best thing for the town, and the scum doesn't get much.

But lynch me and lynch me quickly, there is no point dragging this on, I will not defend myself.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #408 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:50 pm

Albert B. Rampage wrote:I...when someone legitimately attacks you, you get upset.

I'm not upset, I accept my lynch as a desirable outcome.

Albert B. Rampage wrote:You disappoint me.

I am not seeking your good opinion, Sir.

camn · Post Post #409 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:52 pm

Well.. let the carnage ensue, then.
I hope we can be confirmed mason-partners soon? That would be awesome.

/strike: DrippingGoofBall

@nacho: anti-daykill reasons now please?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #410 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:52 pm

I don't understand your reaction, ABR.

Your case clearly shows I'm scum, why are you even discussing with me?

Toogeloo · Post Post #411 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:54 pm

Nachomamma8 wrote:I've already touched on why DSK killing today is a bad idea.

So, it's lynching time.

I always was under the impression a SK has to kill.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #412 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:55 pm

Toogie, please strike me in your next post.

Toogeloo · Post Post #413 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:55 pm

Can't.

Would love to.

But can't.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #414 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:57 pm

Oh, yeah. Dammit. You'd be a sweetheart if you helped me persuade others.

Toogeloo · Post Post #415 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 2:59 pm

Persuasion is simple.

You've been struck so much that risking changing directions at this point could potentially end in a No Death end of day.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #416 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 3:00 pm

1) Doesn't read the rulse
2) Claims to read the game but doesn't read the game (asks Toogeloo to strike)
3) Rushes a lynch without reading the rules and the game
4) Posts nothing of worth despite patient nudges at every stop of the way
5) Trying to kill herself

DGB is scum.

Friend · Post Post #417 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 3:01 pm

I think it's a dumb idea. But DGB wants it...so...

/strike: DrippingGoofball

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #418 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 3:03 pm

camn wrote:Buuuuut.. Im not convinced.
I say it us a very good idea.

Discuss?

If the DSK kills today, then he's killing every day afterward.
So, in order to achieve our perfect balance, we'll have to kill the SK on one of the days after.
Meaning that we'll have to SK-hunt instead of scumhunt, and I see no reason as to why we'd want to do that.

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #419 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 3:05 pm

And yes, I realize that we'd be giving up a free DSK scumhunting shot.
But I would far prefer having however many town-directed roleblocks as opposed to one vig shot.

camn · Post Post #420 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 3:10 pm

Too bad we dont direct whether the SK kills or not.
Why would they want the math to work out?

We need to USE the SK now while our goals are in alignment. And killing scum is in our best interest. That changes as the day progresses.
Of course, given the Locard principle, it may be in the KILLERS best interest not to kill early on...
Maybe that is what you are getting at?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #421 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 3:12 pm

Albert B. Rampage wrote:
for her incredibly charismatic ability to lead a wagon
to its swift conclusion with a honeyed voice and sense of humor unique to her own.[/color][/b]

Please let's get back on the topic of my lynch.

camn · Post Post #422 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 3:13 pm

PLUS! regarding SK-hunting...... they are ALL SKs in this setup.
There are no real scumteams.
Everyone who is mafia wants at least one of their group dead.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #423 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 3:13 pm

Friend wrote:I think it's a dumb idea. But DGB wants it...so...

/strike: DrippingGoofball

Hello opportunistic scum.

camn · Post Post #424 (ISO) » Sun Mar 20, 2011 3:14 pm

Shit. Everyone who is TOWN wants at least one of their group dead, too!

aaaggh