Iammars hasn’t posted in 9 days, and has posted “Very limited access until after Tuesday. And then I have midterms. :ugh: “ in V/LA. Considering he’s been participating actively in other games on the site, in which he’s posted about his upcoming absence, he seems to either be deliberately lurking or has simply forgotten about the game. Either way… mod?
Ranger:
Firstly, I presented my evidence against armlx *before* the bandwagon against Nanook began.RangeroftheNorth [344] wrote:<snip>Vote: EmpTygerI am suspicious of the way he attempted to divert the bandwagon on Nanook with some fairly week evidence against armlx, and I am suspicious of how he has been attempting to lead the town.
Secondly, considering that it was early Day 1, I think the fact that I found *4* pieces of evidence against armlx- even if you want to call it weak evidence- is meaningful. I think it deserves at the very least mention, and without anything more significant, follow up. Consider how much evidence there was against Nanook when his bandwagon began, or even as of my [122].
Thirdly, at that point I was not trying to focusing attention onto armlx, but rather onto Nanook’s bandwagoners. I thought the bandwagon itself more suspicious than anything Nanook had done (at that point), and I feel partially vindicated by the revelation that at least one of those 4 has been revealed as mafia.
And as for leading the town: could you say specifically which alleged instance(s) of my leading the town you feel have been harmful?
