Nacho wrote:I'm not attacking the fact that he apologized for replacing out. Where in my post gave you that perception?
Nacho wrote:He hopes that his replacing out won't make his predecessor look scummy, but he doesn't mention anything about town winning or that sort of thing.
ODM said "I'm sorry for replacing out, don't hold it against my replacement." You bolded the second half and directly stated ODM's slot is scummy for making that statement; you didn't explicitly state, "you're scummy for apologizing", but it's clear that's exactly what you're saying. You explicitly are not calling him scummy for being absent for D1 and you are explicitly not calling him scummy for replacing. You're only calling him scummy for the apology/hope.
Hrezs wrote:The simulation lists TWO paramedics, so clearly you were mistaken just as much as I was
Try reading. Your whining is completely irrelevant to my comment.
AGM wrote:Your required reading for tomorrow: My totally different, actually reasoned out opinion that I posted later (instead of just the lolscum response that I give all the time).
The problem is I know you're good at coming up with a plausible case to try justifying your vote after the fact. That plus I'll recheck your iso when I have more time, but I don't recall seeing what you're referencing in the catchup.
@Camn-
-Explain what I missed int he rest of your post. I'm not seeing it. It sounds like you were simply advocating one of the most anti-town strategies that can be advocated in a game of mafia.
-Scum or town who knows the whole (minus DSK) setup aren't any more likely to obviously push scum than players who just scumhunt and figure it out. Revealing that you KNOW who the scum are makes a player into a much more likely NK since you're dangerous to that scum team and you're going to be harder to lynch.
Toog wrote:Say StrangerCoug single-handedly leads a lynch against ABR, and he flips Gang Leader of the Night Riders
If you're actually ballsy-scum publicly claiming your GF, I applaud you. ThAd's "maybe DSK won't kill today" speculation is still a load of BS even if this kills my analogy.
@Mod-
I'm pretty sure you didn't answer my question (and I'm too lazy to check if you did). I'll rephrase it for something a bit more relevant given our current situation:
-What happens if the DSK kills a player who has already been struck?
--Do players who struck the now dead guy get to strike again? (Assuming no)
--Does a strike by the dead player still count? (Assuming yes)
--Which strikes count towards the 40% & 60% thresholds?
---Is it based on number of living players?
---Is it based on number of strikes already cast + number that can still be cast? (if so does it include strikes on the DSK's target)?
@Toog-
You couldn't wait for confirmation on Magua's potential strike before striking?
@Current wagons-
I'd go with ThAd over the other two. KK would be next.
@ThAd-
Going to acknowledge that I saw your responses. I'm not sure how to proceed or if I even need to since your responses were pretty much, "Lol, you're right on all counts, I'm scummy and I don't care. Now that we've agreed, let's lynch someone else." I'm kinda dumbstruck.
