Time Travel Mafia (Game Over)

[Tragedy]

Wait just remembered. Since we are doing votes secretly no RVS.

Unvote

Votes are not secret.
You post it in thread, obviously!

[GhostWriter]

Go read the rules.

[RangeroftheNorth]

Have you read the rules, Tragedy?
Nominations are submitted by PM to the mod.

[Tragedy]

Spoiler: Rules

1. Lynch Mechanics:

1.1 The discussion phase:

1.1.1 Each player has one vote which can either be on "Lynch" or "No Lynch". Default value at the start of each day is "No Lynch"
1.1.2 You can move your vote to either option at anytime during the game by writing

Lynch

(or

No Lynch

).
1.1.3 As soon as 2/3 of the players (rounded down) are voting for "Lynch", or as soon as deadline hits, game enters

There's nowhere in here that votes of LYNCHING or NO LYNCHING from the rules. If you're talking about Nomination, that's really a secret and yeah.
But we're at a default of "No Lynch" at the moment.

We're talking about votes, not nomination. >_>

[RangeroftheNorth]

Maybe that's what you're talking about, but that clearly wasn't what Mist was talking about

[Tragedy]

Can't tell what she posts, anyways.

[Mist7676]

I meant people BTW

[Tragedy]

It isn't even nomination phase yet, but whatever~
So what now~?

[MrTrow]

/confirm

Exe: you do realise your attack on GreyICE-'lets avoid careless L-1'-plan is aimed at a player who admitted to need another 27 reads to understand it all

GreyICE: the being able to bring people back-thing is something worth discussing, note however it works both ways

Chrono`s(fitting name btw) all dead mafia on top of every lynch-list for example is indeed a good point (asuming there are no powers to mass-invert vote-lists (very unlikely but by 0.2.1 not impossible))

I`ll read the mechanics another 5 times by yesterday and join the discussion soon after




.....OK i`m back

1.1.3 As soon as 2/3 of the players (rounded down) are voting for "Lynch", or as soon as deadline hits, game enters
1.2 The nomination phase:
1.2.1 Everyone (including dead players) has to send me a PM with an ordered list of who they want to lynch (the list has to include every player, including dead ones).

Yes we vote in public, nominate in secret.
Or as it translates to 'more normal mafia situations': we state 'we`re ready to vote' in public ,but do the actual vote in private.

[GhostWriter]

I`ll read the mechanics another 5 times by yesterday and join the discussion soon after




.....OK i`m back

Well played.

[Exe]

You scumhunt and interact, once you feel confident in a scum-read of some sort, then you vote for the lynch phase to start.

It's not rocket science. Treat it like it's mafia until it isn't mafia.

Here's the other plan:

Once we get to lynch phase, the nominee's each have ONE post.

This post should be formatted as follows:

List of players in a tiered format from most scum to most town, or otherwise.
Followed by a case for why they shouldn't be lynched (or, why the other

should

be).

For now,

Unvote, Vote: Kcda

Bad vibes from this one.

P-Edit: MrTrow, I have no clue what that sentence is supposed to mean.

[Tragedy]

You can't vote people at the moment, unless you really want to vote for a lynch, then we nominate peoplez, Exe. <3.
You misread it again.

[Exe]

Omg are you dense?

Vote for who you find scummy.
Ever heard of an FoS?

I know the rules. You just don't know how to read

[Tragedy]

Exe, but I thought we were best friends forever!
Also, I suggest that we should set up a list of who should be executed.. I mean priorly lynched during Nomination Phase.

[Doombunny9]

/confirm

I read the rules and understand them. I also second Tragedy's idea. The town, as a whole, should choose who to nominate/lynch to avoid scum trickery. Other then that, the discussion phase should be played out as if this were a typical game.

[Tragedy]

Basically, it's like a game of Execution Mafia...
Poor town..

[Kcdaspot]

i'm sorry to any confusion i caused

thought this was going to be another quick and dirty game. with a typical lynch structure.

just added time mingf*** things.

so when i read the rules the first go round i had skipped over the lynch mechanics... and just looked at the bit about time travel.

[MrTrow]

@Exe:

Please tell me I'm not the only one who needs to read the rules another 27 times?

Nah.

He admitted to not fully understanding the rules...... yet(hopefully)
Shortly after he makes a post containing the 'no careless L-1 votes' comment.
You pointed it out as 'can`t happen with these rules'.
What i was trying to say was: the mistake and posts before are consistent (as i read it as an attack, due to the start of that post)



As for the 'possibility to vote in thread'-discussion.

vote: playerX

doesn`t serve it`s normal purpose of actually getting someone lynched.
It still can be used to show your 'top scumread'
If the discussion is about whether or not it should still be called a 'vote' because of this, i`d like to say 'next discussion please'

Off to read a thing or 2 about execution-mafia.

[GhostWriter]

Um, why did you guys think we were required to post previous experience with crazy mechanics? For the lulz?

[Kcdaspot]

clarify.

i thought crazy GAME mechanics, not crazy LYNCH mechanics.

i'm clear on this now though.

[Doombunny9]

Question: Does any of this really even matter anymore. I'm pretty sure everyone knows by now that there are crazy lynch and night mechanics so there's no need to keep talking about it and going off on tangents. I understand that it may be confusing to some but after three pages, we should be having some discussion about things other than mechanics. So as of right now I'm going to declare this a RQS to (hopefully) get the ball rolling:

@Everyone-What is your opinion of policy lynches and Lynch all Lurkers/Lynch all Liars in particular?
Have you played with any of the people in this game before?
How active are you?

As for me, I only support a policy lynch if there are no better lynches to go off of. I also only follow Lynch all Lurkers if there is other evidence to support them being scum but I am a heavy beleiver in Lynch all Liars since town rarely have a good reason to lie. I have played with Chrono, RC, smar, GW, and Exe before and I try to post three times a day spread out every day.

And one more thing: This shouldn't need to be mentioned but any killing roles should kill and when docs see a dead power role they should go back in time and protect them for an insta-clear.

[Tragedy]

Played with Amrun, Exe and TS so far, in regular games.
Could be active, but posting in-game is a different story.
Probably would stick with LAL or Certain Policy Lynches.

[Amrun]

Blah blah blah, one lynch vote doesn't send us automatically into nomination phase; nomination phase doesn't end immediately.

I voted for lynch because I do have a clear scum candidate and didn't see the harm in one person voting lynch.

Kcdaspot's "joke" is anti-town any way you toss it; it's rolefishing and no real doctor would do it, confirming he's not the doctor for scum if there is one. I don't think town would have done such a thing.

Policy lynch only when absolutely necessary; lynch lurkers only if suspected scum and/or before lylo; lynch liars only when the lie seems scum motivated.

Played with a bunch of people, including Tragedy, GreyICE, Exe, RC and don't remember who else from the playerlist.

I post quite a bit.

[Kcdaspot]

A) Policy lynch is a policy lynch. As long as there is only one. this game? Lying may be forgiven but lurkers need pressure. This game needs activity for town to win.

B) Mr trow in mish mash. Mist in a ongoing. And GW won't remember me from ATHF mafia.

C) I post often but I overdo it sometimes.

I wasn't rolefishing. I was joking. <<End of discussion.

[RangeroftheNorth]

ME: Insert Obligatory Refusal To Answer Pointless Questions Here
GROUP A: Vote: Ranger for refusing to answer pointless questions
GROUP B: Vote: Group A for thinking not answering questions is scummy

There, now that's done with. Can we get on with the game now?