HEHAEHAHEHAHEAHAHAEHAHHA
DANCE
DANCE
When crypto responded to this question, how much did you look into his response?VP Baltar wrote:@crypto - what is your opinion about this setup and what do you think is the optimal strategy?
This is clearly him saying 'I know I'm being scummy and I'm going to try to stem the backdraft on my shit post by preempting you'.LL wrote:I will not address any further inquiries about my play nor any flip floppery I have taken. What I have done stands as is. Sue me.
Doesn't make sense if our role PMs are different. You can make whatever conjectures about what you want. All I am saying is that I highly doubt SD would have made it long after that. True or False? I'd like to see you claim it otherwise.LL wrote:argument falls apart as vp baltar has revealed that he expected sd to go eventually, hence if he ever voted or attacked sd, then it was purely to his benefit.
Not a lot to be honest. I took his word at face value because he seemed earnest in his answers to me. I definitely could have pressed harder at that time, but I suppose I was kind of giving him a bit more of a pass than I should have simply because he was one of the players I had a decent amount of experience with.Equinox wrote:When crypto responded to this question, how much did you look into his response?
I totally disagree. He was too out in the open and burning banners to get lynches. I would have believed him to be a VT with how aggressive he was being. Definitely wouldn't have thought tracker. He also didn't have any obvious breadcrumbs that I noticed or anything. I think the most logical conclusion is that an LL-scum and SD-scum wanted him dead because they were recurring names on his scum list. What about his play reminds you of SR in that game?Equinox wrote:By the way, VP Baltar, I think Ythill getting killed because he was a power role is pretty likely. His behavior here is similar to sottyrulez's behavior in Open 250.5.
I'll give you one guess.RC wrote:Damnit, Equinox.
LL, why are you lazing about? You realize you're about to be strung up?
Well you had an entire case on why your buddy was town, and almost nothing to say about your LuckayLuck vote, so I was guessing that.chesskid3 wrote:I DONT BUS
It's funny VP.VP Baltar wrote:Considering he's read more of the game than you, it actually makes sense he'd have good reads Grey. Disagree? Care to read the game yet? Thought nooooooooooooot.
Patience, sir. The cases on Fate-town and Fate-scum are many in number, quite large, and very involved. Besides, LuckayLuck and VP Baltar look worse at the moment.RedCoyote wrote:Damnit, Equinox.
So you asked to see if someone did thinking about the setup without even seeing whether he actually did? I'm all for tone hunting, but ignoring the content of crypto's post gives the impression that your initial question was insincere. It was very obvious, even with a very cursory glance, that crypto completely misunderstood the setup; for someone who expected town to think about the setup, you sure didn't dwell on it too much. As for giving crypto a pass... not what I'd have expected of you, VP Baltar.VP Baltar wrote:Not a lot to be honest. I took his word at face value because he seemed earnest in his answers to me. I definitely could have pressed harder at that time, but I suppose I was kind of giving him a bit more of a pass than I should have simply because he was one of the players I had a decent amount of experience with.
I could argue sottyrulez were pretty blatant, too. Both sottyrulez and Ythill were more fixated than the average townie on power role claims. sottyrulez's case against me was based on lynching vanilla claims to protect the power roles; it became obvious as time when on they meant them. Ythill was somewhat the same way with his power role strategy and whatnot.VP Baltar wrote:What about his play reminds you of SR in that game?
What do you make of LuckayLuck sticking to the Shadow Dancer wagon when momentum was shifting to AlmasterGM?VP Baltar wrote:Also, just as a side note, I hope people look at vote counts in ISO don't get confused about where LL was at on the Shadow Dancer wagon. He was very late to that game and there was just a lot of wagon movement in the final two days of that wagon. It was messing with me at first two until I checked out the votecounts more closely.
I'm not denying it was lazy. It was and I've said that since way back when. I had RL/other ongoing games happening at that time which were chewing my time. Could have been played better, but I just went with my gut feeling on it. It is what it is I guess.Equinox wrote:So you asked to see if someone did thinking about the setup without even seeing whether he actually did? I'm all for tone hunting, but ignoring the content of crypto's post gives the impression that your initial question was insincere. It was very obvious, even with a very cursory glance, that crypto completely misunderstood the setup; for someone who expected town to think about the setup, you sure didn't dwell on it too much. As for giving crypto a pass... not what I'd have expected of you, VP Baltar.
Wasn't his strategy to out the PRs pretty quickly though? IIRC, he wanted most of them outted by like Day 2 or 3 just to get the info out there. Doesn't seem like a protect the PRs strategy. Maybe your memory is fresher on it because you just read it, but that's what I recall.Equinox wrote:I could argue sottyrulez were pretty blatant, too. Both sottyrulez and Ythill were more fixated than the average townie on power role claims. sottyrulez's case against me was based on lynching vanilla claims to protect the power roles; it became obvious as time when on they meant them. Ythill was somewhat the same way with his power role strategy and whatnot.
His posting was pretty sparse during this time considering, so that is the first thing of note. Second, the momentum was shifting pretty quick and he may have thought he could get off by staying on the bus wagon while the mislynch happened. I don't think it was necessarily out of conviction that SD was scum that he stayed there. A lot of his posts from this time blatantly say 'not much I can do here'. And he's calling zoraster and Jarti scummy more than SD, imo. In fact, I don't even know how he names those three as scum when his vote for SD says:Equinox wrote:What do you make of LuckayLuck sticking to the Shadow Dancer wagon when momentum was shifting to AlmasterGM?
It's just out of left field that he calls SD scum (giving Jarti credit for finding the scum), then pages later he's convinced the scum team is SD (confirmed scum he barely mentioned previously), Zoraster (confirmed town), Jarti (person he gave credit to for convincing him on SD scum?). It's all very bizarre to me.LL wrote:I will throw caution to the winds and trust in crypto & fate. I begrudgingly give Jarti credit on having a 'note to self' on Shadow Dancer's shady activities.
Post #1048 of Shadow Dancer's actually simply makes no sense. It has no townie flow to it.
VP Baltar wrote:Well, yeah, we shouldn't lynch until the replacements get in here and catch up. But we can't put it all on them or this is going to go too much down to the wire.
I'm not really sure how I feel about Maemuki...though I've been back and forth on that slot so many times this game it's ridiculous. You guys really don't see VV as trying to distance from SD late yesterday?
VP Baltar wrote:I'd say scumz are LL and one of GREYice/VV
VP Baltar wrote:When did I say I thought you were scum?
VP Baltar wrote:My point is that you haven't attempted to have any kind of real thought process or discussion about why you think I'm scum.You've come with a preconceived notion and tried to use rhetoric to make your horrible case seem better. I know for a fact that you're wrong, so I'm trying to get you to use your brain for a bit and actually consider the game. You have failed to do so. That's cool. If this were earlier in the game and we had mislynches to spare, I probably wouldn't even care because I pretty much despise how lazy the town has been this entire game. I would gladly die. However, that's not the case so I'm stuck arguing with you.
Now, once again I suggest you try to actually look at context and read closely instead of making snap judgments. This is pretty much my final appeal. If you are just going to reply with more derpy 'scumplaining' throwaway comments, just save it.
@Fate - I suggest you read over LuckayLuck between Mar. 10-12 and stop being lazy. You're pissing me off because you can play better than this.
VP Baltar wrote:Don't blame me because fate decided to quit in the past ten pages.
Also, end of game will vindicate every single thing I've said about you playing like shit.So, let's just end that discussion,as it's a pointless ego battle I don't have the patience for.