This post by Bob makes little sense.
bobsnox wrote:tarsonisocelot wrote:Just got the message.
That's a lot of N0 deaths, more than I would expect from just scum or scum + SK. Could some of them have targeted a Paranoid Gun Owner?
No reads yet so VOTE: Ant_to_the_max.
Was there any particular reason that you thought posting first was dangerous? If yes, are there any other things we should be wary of?
I'm always suspicious of the first person to post/question the previous night's events, so I'm wary of posting first. That's probably what ATTM meant.
You're suspicous of the first person to post or the first one to question the night's events? You did both of those, yet you claim you're wary of doing such. There's no reason to defend him either. If he's town he should be able to explain himself.
[quote="bobsnox]Not liking the EPenguin nitpicking. I see scum do that all the time early in the game. It's actually the reason I was voting Stels (seen it from Stels before).
UNVOTE: Stels
VOTE: Energetic Penguin[/quote]I can buy that you think nitpicking is a scumtell. Voting stels for that reason doesn't make any sense because he hasn't posted yet and it sounds like this may be something he does out of personality.
bobsnox wrote:To be clear, my "scummy play" has been pointing out that I was wary of posting first because I always suspect the person who posts first?
If so, that's crap. But it's Day One so I expect crap I guess.
Well I think you should drop the idea that posting first is a scumtell. It makes no sense and you run into oddities like suspecting yourself.
Stels wrote:@lololololfunnypeople: Wow... Just wow. He caught scum, and a good enough reason. If you can't see it, you are blind. I like how you guys freak out at my first vote.
What freakout? Only one person responded to your vote. As for this "good reason", how is anyone to decide if its good or not if they aren't told what it is? Just because you think you've noticed it doesn't mean you call other people blind.
@People voting for me: What's the reasoning?