My existence bothers you. Why?Cobblerfone wrote:Spadille is trying too hard. Whether scum or town, he's trying way too hard.
You yourself refused to discuss this and I am already standing on my decision for your lynch, I have everything on you now.Cobblerfone wrote:You were all for discussion when Quilford was at L-1 and before that and after that!
I didn't want to discuss it because I didn't want you wasting time on a townie. But fine, would scum vote-hop and vote without proper reasons?Spadille wrote:You yourself refused to discuss this and I am already standing on my decision for your lynch, I have everything on you now.
And if I am right, they will discuss before voting.
Spadille wrote: WIFOM
I sincerely doubt that you are right. Also, if you wereSpadille wrote:And if I am right, they will discuss before voting.
Spadille wrote:The only thing I was sure about is one of you is scum. Even though you are scummier, doesn't mean he was not scummy. I don't want to lose grip of the bandwagon because while entertaining your worthless case against me, I am observing Mr. Quilford's reactions on Heliman, izak and Trendall's harassments.
So you think these people will just vote for you and say nothing whatsoever? LOL.Cobblerfone wrote:I sincerely doubt that you are right.
What are you basing your votes on? Shit Logic? You still haven't answered me.Cobblefone wrote:I'm certainly not basing votes on them anymore.
What the fuck are you on about?Cobblerfone wrote:Which one? Why I think DDD is scum? I said I didn't, just that he's unreadable. Though you're covering him makes me think you two could be linked. IDK.
You said the last question, that was the last question in the post. Sorry for being literal. Is it the one about why I wanted Heliman lynched? Isn't it obvious? I thought he was scum at the time. Doesn't get any simpler than that.Spadille wrote:Are you gonna play dumb and not gonna pay attention to the links I'm giving you? This is like the third time.
Stupidly and because he seemed scummy. I can't think of any examples off the top of my head. But I don't feel like coming up with reasons for why I thought someone scummy when I don't anymore. I'd rather focus on who I think is scum now. You've misinterpreted posts in a way that distorts them, such as saying that Quilford's one big post against was parroting, and convincing even myself that I've acted scummy when looking back I don't think I have.Spadille wrote:
HOW AND WHY.
I... I just don't understand your point. I said I didn't want to vote because I didn't want to rush the day because there were several players I didn't have a good read on. Whether you or any other player have a good read on me is irrelevant to my original point.Heliman wrote:@DebonairI didn't say you were accusing us of being scummy, and I never attached the word "scum" to those players, only you..Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:Hey Heliman, watch out you're getting a lack of reading comprehension all over you. I never stated or implied that I thought those players were scum; just that I didn't want to rush the day so I could get reads on those players.Heliman wrote:@DDDWoah DDD you may want to watch where you trip, you're getting scum all over your suit! Why? because by my count we basically have the same amount of posts.Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:and there are way too many low information players in Heliman, Trendall, and jmurph right now.
You on the other hand, include me in that list which is perfectly acceptable if you don't have a read on me but you also seem to attach the word scum to those players. Tell me Heliman, do you consider these low information players scum because you're scum and you're one of them; is that why it's significant?I'm accusing you of being falsely distressed by a party you yourself are apart of.
Well I was doing this crazy thing called sleeping for most of the time and then I didn't see an actual question about the topic. The badge means that I was part of the scum-team that won best scum-team on the site for 2010. The idea that I'm impossible to read, however, is absurd; sure I strive to be hard to read (that is always to be read as town) but when I'm scum I make mistakes the same as anyone.Cobblerfone wrote: And by covering, I mean worried that I'm suspicious of him. I still don't know whether or not he's scum though. He actually hasn't answered my question of what his title actually means. Must be at work or something. I'll go look it up on the wiki. I'm sure it's there.
No, YOU will. Otherwise you are agreeing that YOU are VOTING WITHOUT PROPER REASONS. Why did you vote Heliman? You don't need to come up with reasons if you have one.Cobblerfone wrote:But I don't feel like coming up with reasons for why I thought someone scummy when I don't anymore.
The reason is that you are constantly dodging and circling questions around, throwing in fail argument or you fail to answer the correct question.Cobblerfone wrote:Also, look at this, we're taking up a page.