Magister Ludi wrote:Listen to this as well Thor.
1. I asked you to look at pappums, because of several actions that were questionable, at best.
2. Your last postdismissesmy push on the rat, essentially boiling it down to because Magister is SCUM because of GUT, pappums isTOWN
3. Calcifer, one post prior established that if we assume Gollum is town, based on a vig claim, we can then assume pappums is scum. (Others may or may not agree with this statement.)
4. You then say Calcifer is, even though he just pushed on theTOWNEXACT SAMEperson I did, for similar thought processes.
5. This shows your reads and pushes aren'tCONDITIONALon this game, but on a weak basis, as you use the SAME criteria to judge two different peopleDIFFERENTLY.
6. The purpose of this inconsistency comes from...scum.
Bub, Pappums of Thor are now the best lynches.
Also, as long as I'm bothering to do cases - let's shoot this in the face for lulz;
1. Yeah, I agree this happened.
2. Actually...no, my dismissal of the papum's case had nothing to do with you being scummy, it had everything to do with you not actually showcasing him doing anything scummy.
3. Ah, so your pappum's case was predicated on Calcifer's case? Why didn't you just say so? (hint - methinks this is trying to sponge off town points to make himself look better)
4. Calcifer being town in my eyes has
5. If I had said you were scum for pushing pappum (which even you didn't say I did) and if I'd then also said Calcifer was scum for pushing pappum you might actually have been on to something here.
6. Yes, your case is like a finely honed steel trap, and I am helpless within it.
...this was actually a lot less of a case than I thought it was. Your other post basically calls me scum for not following up on a question I asked you to follow up on about a player you suspected and wanted my support on to lynch. (yeah, *that's* a scumtell. Oooh, and gut, apparently it's scummy to mention gut. I'll have to remember that.
I'm comfortable with my logic and vote, how are things between your ears?