Mini 1176: Dexter Season 2 (Game Over) Who Won?

[tanstalas]

I do not find myself being nervous in this game, if you think I am being nervous that's your opinion. Defensive yes, nervous no.

Unvote
Vote: Amrun

For the contradiction of you spiting people for voting without reasons when you are guilty of the same.

In the very next post Amrun stated:

KKN was defending you, and you attack him for the opposite of what his post meant.

You're scummy for being so jumpy and on-edge. If you were trying to move the game out of RVS, that would be one thing, but you were actually trying to keep the game IN RVS, which is a scumtell, though one so common it's not worth much anymore. But your opening post seemed so careful and had an air of "trying to fit in" and just came across as nervous. All of the rest of your posts maintain that nervousness. Why are you so nervous? I think it's because you're scum.

That misrep of KKN is so blatant you must have misread, but it does show you're eager to throw mud on someone else and get the attention off of you.

So what exactly is the point of your vote on Amrun when it is not based in fact.

I'm confused Farside. You must have way too many windows open and are confusing yourself. Where you quoted me was WAY after the Amrun quote.

My vote was based on amrun voting me without giving a reason then later criticizing people who placed votes WITHOUT a reason

AMRUN - ISO-3

(

Post #43

in the whole scheme of things)

VOTE: Tansatalas

Don't see the case on KKN. Words might help. See it for tsjkdsdhjswhatever though.

AMRUN - ISO-6

(

Post #53

in the whole scheme of things)

Actually, it's not.

I am by no means convinced tansaltas is scum, but he is most deserving of my vote right now as no one else has stuck out as scummy to me.

If this whole game is going to be votes with no reasoning behind them, then it's going to get old pretty fast

.

TANSTALAS - ISO-

8 (

Post #76

in the whole scheme of things)

I do not find myself being nervous in this game, if you think I am being nervous that's your opinion. Defensive yes, nervous no.

Unvote
Vote: Amrun

For the contradiction of you spiting people for voting without reasons when you are guilty of the same.

As you can see my post that you said was before Amrun's is actually QUITE A BIT after. So maybe I am missing something? Please clarify? Or accept my reasoning for voting Amrun as a hypocrite.

And the post of Amrun's you quoted was (

ISO-4 And overall #50

) again way before the quote of mine you quoted.

[Amrun]

She knows. She's saying that you said I had no reasons for my vote when I clearly did. Once again, read more carefully.

[tanstalas]

Thanks for answering for her Amrun. However I do believe you are wrong, as she clearly was asking me what my vote on you was for.

So what exactly is the point of your vote on Amrun when it is not based in fact.

What does that look like? Looks like she is asking me why I voted for you. However, you said:

She knows. She's saying that you said I had no reasons for my vote when I clearly did. Once again, read more carefully.

I never said you had no reasons for the vote on me. You didn't explain it when you first voted me though, and then you bitched because other people gave no reasoning to their votes. Do you understand that?

So, you should take your own advice and read more carefully.

You answering for her though when I specifically asked for her input is noted though.

Hinduragi/farside/amrun scum team?

[Amrun]

I understand what you were saying, but I also understand what farside was saying. I wasn't answering a question that anyone with basic reading comprehension could not have answered by reading farside's post.

Farside can expand upon her intentions, but what I said is the basic interpreation of what has already been posted.

That is not answering for someone else, and even if it was, how would thhat be a scumtell?

Each of your conclusions has been wildly unfounded and it's a trend I don't like.

[Juls]

Official Vote Count

[5]

tanstalas

(Kise, Budja, Amrun, farside22, Hinduragi)

[4]

Kid Know Nothing

(Locke Lamora, VP Baltar, LynchMePls, Sotty7)

[1]

Sotty7

(SocioPath)

[1]

LynchMePls

(Kid Know Nothing)

[1]

Hinduragi

(tanstalas)

[0]

Kise

()

[0]

Amrun

()

[0]

Locke Lamora

()

[0]

SocioPath

()

[0]

VP Baltar

()

[0]

Budja

()

[0]

Debonair Danny DiPietro

( )

[0]

farside22

( )

Not Voting :

Debonair Danny DiPietro

Votes needed for arrest :

7

Deadline for Day 1:

(expired on 2011-06-14 16:45:00)

[VP Baltar]

Gun to my head I prefer the tanstalas wagon to the KKN wagon but neither of them impresses really.

And yet you're voting no one. m'kay.

[Debonair Danny DiPietro]

Gun to my head I prefer the tanstalas wagon to the KKN wagon but neither of them impresses really.

And yet you're voting no one. m'kay.

I never would've predicted that it would be VP Baltar who'd be the one to whine at me for that. What a surprise.

[VP Baltar]

show me your townie colors so we can start interrogating some criminals

[Debonair Danny DiPietro]

show me your townie colors so we can start interrogating some criminals

But all I have right now in regards to a scum read is "gut lol" and I want to swing a bigger stick than a vote based on gut.

[Sotty7]

Sotty: What's you thoughts about how he jumps from player to player who has attacked him so far with very weak reasoning? I think the only one I found maybe valid was Hinduragi, but I didn't read all his games. I only looked through some of them and I didn't see him vote hop in the ones I was able to look through.
Look at his vote on KKN here This looks like blantantly jumping on a BW because the reason's are not even there. The Amrun vote is not even based on fact and his vote on Budja comes after Kise ask him why he didn't vote for Budja in the first place. I typically see scum vote after someone pointed out the lack of vote.

Your point about tans KKN is actually pretty good, that had slipped under the radar for me. It does look like obvious wagon hopping. However, I thought his Amrun vote was for her not explaining her initial reasoning despite criticising the KKN wagon votes for doing the same thing. Am I missing something there?

[Sotty7]

Okay reading back, it went more like:

Amrun votes tans with no reason
tans asks her why
Amrun explains
I show up vote and pressure Amrun
After our back and forth tans shows up with a vote for Amrun which he quickly abandons.

tans why didn't you switch your vote to Amrun right away if you felt her lack of reasoning was scummy? It looks like you waited until there was already pressure there to vote.

[tanstalas]

Okay reading back, it went more like:

Amrun votes tans with no reason
tans asks her why
Amrun explains
I show up vote and pressure Amrun
After our back and forth tans shows up with a vote for Amrun which he quickly abandons.

tans why didn't you switch your vote to Amrun right away if you felt her lack of reasoning was scummy? It looks like you waited until there was already pressure there to vote.

People vote all the time with no reasons given. While I think its anti-town sometimes its not worth a vote this early. What made me place my vote was because Amrun feigned exasperation and annoyance of people doing that. If you don't like people doing that why do it yourself?

Hence the hypocrite comment and vote on her in myy very next post after she did that.

/phonepost

[Budja]

People vote all the time with no reasons given. While I think its anti-town sometimes its not worth a vote this early.

Vote: Budja

Well?

[tanstalas]

Not sure what you are getting at?

I asked you questions, you didn't answer them, that's when I put my vote on you. If you want to compare stuff please compare apples to apples instead of trying to misrep me

[Amrun]

Okay reading back, it went more like:

Amrun votes tans with no reason
tans asks her why
Amrun explains
I show up vote and pressure Amrun
After our back and forth tans shows up with a vote for Amrun which he quickly abandons.

tans why didn't you switch your vote to Amrun right away if you felt her lack of reasoning was scummy? It looks like you waited until there was already pressure there to vote.

People vote all the time with no reasons given. While I think its anti-town sometimes its not worth a vote this early. What made me place my vote was because Amrun feigned exasperation and annoyance of people doing that. If you don't like people doing that why do it yourself?

Hence the hypocrite comment and vote on her in myy very next post after she did that.

/phonepost

But you responded to me AFTER I did that without a vote. Then, after Sotty voted for me, you decided it was worthy of a vote.

Why the delay?

[tanstalas]

But you responded to me AFTER I did that without a vote. Then, after Sotty voted for me, you decided it was worthy of a vote.

Why the delay?

What is with these misreps this game.

PLEASE QUOTE ME THIS MYSTICAL POST WHERE I RESPONDED TO YOU AFTER YOUR POST 53 AND BEFORE I VOTED YOU.

DO IT NOW!

[Amrun]

I don't know if I see it as scummy or anti-town. Wanting someone to talk more is never anti-town in my book.

Why is it scummy or anti-town? Why did you say that? Why did you not also inclue "null" or "over eager"?

Vote: KKN

@Amrun - you see why I am scum eh? Can you enlighten me as to why you think I am scum? Also when you answer with whatever BS reason you have please also inclue why in your opinion/experience that is scummy.

This one.

[Amrun]

It wasn't after post 53, but I don't know why you are even talking about post 53. No one else is.

[tanstalas]

THAT WAS BEFORE YOUR POST 53 WHERE YOU SAID:

If this whole game is going to be votes with no reasoning behind them, then it's going to get old pretty fast.

THAT WAS ONE OF THE REASONS I VOTED FOR YOU BECAUSE YOU CRITICIZED PEOPLE FOR VOTING WITHOUT REASONS WHEN YOU IN FACT WERE GUILTY OF THAT.

READING IS FUCKING TECH

P-EDIT: I WAS TALKING ABOUT IT IN MY POST 76 AND THEN AGAIN IN POST 100 BECAUSE I WAS UNSURE OF WHAT FARSIDE WAS REFERRING TO

[Amrun]

VOTE: Tansatalas

Don't see the case on KKN. Words might help. See it for tsjkdsdhjswhatever though.

But that came after I said this, which was basically the same thing, and shows my unintentional hypocrisy much better.

[tanstalas]

Not the same thing IMO. You were asking for an explanation of why people were voting KKN. That is not scummy.

Placing a vote on me without giving reasoning is not necessarily scummy either.

In your post 53 though you criticized people for placing votes without reasoning when you were guilty of the exact same thing. THAT is why I placed my vote on you in my VERY NEXT POST.

Get it yet?

[Kid Know Nothing]

Adding a point really quickly before heading back to work. I do not like post 35 The back and forth with Tas and Kise saying you know you are scum and tas asking for a reason, then saying is it because of he didn't vote for Budja, then fixes it by voting for budja says he is more then aware of things then he is letting on. I also read the link and I found Tas more joking around and trying to understand then nervous in the link. This game he's like, what did i do and now following others scum suspect.

unvote:
vote: tanstalas

~Fixed url tag

Tans, can you respond to this directly. I think this is the strongest point against you.

KKN - are you an alt? If yes, have I played with your main before?

Yes and no. I used to play under ClockworkRuse a few years ago. But I forgot my login to the e-mail associated to the account and couldn't access it. So I just started fresh with this account. I think we may have played in Ramen Mafia, under this account. Though that was quite a while ago and I really don't have a way to check. I think we have played in a game before though, if memory serves.

Tan day analysis will be coming most likely at eleven or twelve. I am exhausted right now and am only going to focus on what has been posted in this game. Re-reading now but wanted to address this first. Separate post incoming.

[Hinduragi]

In your post 53 though you criticized people for placing votes without reasoning when you were guilty of the exact same thing. THAT is why I placed my vote on you in my VERY NEXT POST.

How is frustration over something she seemingly inadvertently posted make her scum, though?

[farside22]

Tans: If you are looking so closely at the post numbers you would see your vote on Amrun was post 76 which was after Amrun explained his vote. Your reason's for voting him on post 76 was no longer valid.

[tanstalas]

Tans: If you are looking so closely at the post numbers you would see your vote on Amrun was post 76 which was after Amrun explained his vote. Your reason's for voting him on post 76 was no longer valid.

This will be the 6th or 7th time I have now explained this.

I placed my vote on her because of the hypocritical-ness of her post 53 where she criticized people for placing votes without reasoning when she did the EXACT SAME THING.

Amrun saying she "should have" added more to her vote is after the fact(post 56). The same reason why you are on me for voting for Budja, after the fact.

So, when Amrun ammends something after the fact it is fine, but when I do it - that is a scumtell to you farside? Hypocritical women in this damn game