Jase wrote:
What's the case against red all about?
For me the main point against him was how he voted C-Worl while also saying that he'd be happy to unvote and vote Ocelot instead.
Jase wrote:
What's the case against red all about?
Jase wrote:Bluh. The Point is to avoid having everyone post "Yeah guys let's ignore c-worls WIFOM". Yes we are going to do that. No I don't want to hear that everyone agrees that "Yeah let's do that". I know it's a bad idea to look into, and so does everyone else. I was hoping that my first post on the matter would have been the end of the c-wifom discussion but that kinda got kicked in the head when TO took that post and ran with it. Hopefully This Post will be the end of that discussion.
I've gotta wonder if TOs willingness to pursue a trivial sidecase, and place a vote until I stop being a dick (being a dick is my natural state thank you very much) speaks to her alignment at all. Specifically spending the time to "analyze" my post and having it culminating with a vote that is essentially "Stop that" and not one that is "You're scum".
tarsonisocelot wrote:Jase wrote:Bluh. The Point is to avoid having everyone post "Yeah guys let's ignore c-worls WIFOM". Yes we are going to do that. No I don't want to hear that everyone agrees that "Yeah let's do that". I know it's a bad idea to look into, and so does everyone else. I was hoping that my first post on the matter would have been the end of the c-wifom discussion but that kinda got kicked in the head when TO took that post and ran with it. Hopefully This Post will be the end of that discussion.
I've gotta wonder if TOs willingness to pursue a trivial sidecase, and place a vote until I stop being a dick (being a dick is my natural state thank you very much) speaks to her alignment at all. Specifically spending the time to "analyze" my post and having it culminating with a vote that is essentially "Stop that" and not one that is "You're scum".
You do realize that the only reason I posted was to say to someone who apparently at the time did not see attempting to analyse C-WIFOM as pure folly that it was, and that no-one was likely to comment further? Nope, not willing to put the past page from you away until I've reread you or you've posted something actually useful.
You were scummy at the start of the game, then began to play townie and I'm not just going to overlook the past few posts of yours which have been "wtf?" derailing.
I'm not voting you because you're being annoying, I'm voting you because you're being weird in a way which disrupts discussion - and is therefore anti-town.
The second half of your post appears to attempt to non-confrontationally suggest you think I'm scum. If so then why? Make a case. If not then why post that?
Me=w: Let's not line up lynches yeah?
Me=Weird wrote:Looking at andrews iso, the only living players he doesn't mention are me, zdenek, rotn(s slot), and redtails slot. As someone said, he seems like a kind of person who'll ignore his partners, so assuming that, it narrows down to us four.
c-worls iso's 12-13 could be scum talking to a partner, but it's a weaker tell. The people he mentions least are me, zdenek, and rotn. As I know I'm town, that leaves rotn, zde, and red. Connections point strongest to rotn and zde, but as zde has actually made contributions,I say rotn goes first.
tarsonisocelot wrote:I'm not analysing the wifom. You are the only person who has attempted to do that. Was that a mistake yesterday?
I am analysing Jase's response.
Uncle Pain wrote:Hmm, I’ve been wondering… I know this is highly vague but ever since Powerrox93 decided to give RangeroftheNorth an extended deadline to participate, I had this tiny hunch he could have some important role in this game. Now with #483 my hunch becomes greater. Due to the nature of the posts that this slot has given us so far, I find it not far-fetched to assume that he could be an anti-town PR… maybe a serial killer that failed to kill anyone due to the inactivity of the players? It probably isn’t the scum goon sending the night kill choices, otherwise Night 2 probably would have had no kill. The way Powerrox93 worded it, it’s also possible that it’s a linked role. I don’t know, I’m just guessing… but since all our major questions are directed towards the player behind the slot, I think we could spend our “free” time thinking about things like these.
crazypianist1116 wrote:Blah I have some bias towards those thoughts as well but I'd like to think that Powerrox would have extended the night deadline regardless of who was being replaced. Trying to outguess the mod though will not lead to good results. If it works it unbalances the game and makes it less fun, and if it doesn't then you're just making uninformed decisions.
imaginality wrote:Vote: Rangerofthenorth.
jase wrote:The bold part implies that somebody from the list goes second.
Me=Weird wrote:jase wrote:The bold part implies that somebody from the list goes second.
Yes, because I want all my suspects lynched, but the one I want dead most is rotn/setael. I don't see why you're making such a big deal of it. Does it ever actually happen?
imaginality, I didn't mention andrew much because he was a null read, and c-worl because I had a hard time telling whether he was noob or scum.
Does what ever actually happen? Lined up lynches? Do you think the associative tell with andrew/c-worl is strong enough for a lynch?
Me=weird, what was the strong connection between RotN and C-Worl?
"Uncle Pain, post 422 wrote:Actually, I found it a bit relieving to see that someone may finally have found something scummy about me because – since I don’t feel like an expert at this game¹ – a pure town read from all of you just puts me in a position of pressure where I feel I have to keep being the towniest of all. No one plays perfectly, everyone makes mistakes now and then and I’m no exception.
This doesn’t even make sense. And seriously, if THAT is the only thing that makes Zden think c-worl might be town, again, why has he not mentioned him until now?Zdenek wrote:Overall, his play is definitely anti-town, and the only thing that makes me think that he could be town is that don't think that scum would hammer after being told not to.
imaginality wrote:@Uncle Pain - any reason not to post your longish post anyhow, if you still have it?
Uncle Pain wrote:Hmm, I’ve been wondering… I know this is highly vague but ever since Powerrox93 decided to give RangeroftheNorth an extended deadline to participate, I had this tiny hunch he could have some important role in this game. Now with #483 my hunch becomes greater. Due to the nature of the posts that this slot has given us so far, I find it not far-fetched to assume that he could be an anti-town PR… maybe a serial killer that failed to kill anyone due to the inactivity of the players? It probably isn’t the scum goon sending the night kill choices, otherwise Night 2 probably would have had no kill. The way Powerrox93 worded it, it’s also possible that it’s a linked role. I don’t know, I’m just guessing… but since all our major questions are directed towards the player behind the slot, I think we could spend our “free” time thinking about things like these.
Setael wrote:
zdenek post 23 sheeps imaginality
Setael wrote:
p 128 Odd for zdenek to not even comment on Uncle Pain, the leading wagon.
Setael wrote:
Zdenek post 330 tries to derail cworl wagon and start one on redtail. Then in 360 he’s agreeing with uncle pain that Redtail is scummy for supposedly preparing an escape from the c-worl wagon. If this is the case, and Zdenek thinks c-worl is scum, why isn’t he voting c-worl? Or mentioning him at all? Then when the redtail wagon doesn’t take, in post 424 when c-worl is at L-1 he tries to get momentum moved to crazypianist.
Setael wrote:
The interaction between zdenek and uncle pain while c-worl was about to be lynched is fishy. It’s like Uncle Pain was seeing that the townies were letting zdenek fly under the radar, so he made sure to ask him lots of questions, just not about c-worl.
Setael wrote:
Zdenek's 402 without details is scummy