Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Tajo, I'm not as certain.
Nah, that's not tajoscum.
Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Tajo, I'm not as certain.
Tanarin wrote:I'm no liking how thAdmadral is suddenly changing up HOW he is calculating his list based on "weight". Notice how it basically made it so Chrono would HAVE to be lynched by his logic. This is AFTER people were deciding that xvart may indeed be a good lynch. Cult looking for a myslynch? I think so.
Unvote Vote Thadmral
DrippingGoofball wrote:I hate the above list WITH A PASSION.
Porochaz wrote:Woah there, that seems arbitrary. I didn't list mine in order of preference and if I did it wouldn't be a simple 3/2/1 exercise anyway.
DrippingGoofball wrote:We need to stop this insanity. It's gone to far. What are we doing, the scum's tax returns?
DrippingGoofball wrote:Let's speak no more of ordered lists and carry on with the lynch.
Porochaz wrote:Im not open to looking at xvart because its turned a game I like into random guessing which is what this bandwagon is.
xvart - 8 (Yosarian2, Seraphim, ThAdmiral, DrippingGoofball, Chronopie, Fritzler, bvoigt, Nobody Special)
=
Yosarian2 wrote:Really not happy with the way TheAdmeral is trying to do some meaningless math voodo to figure out who we should lynch rather then just placing his own vote based on his own logic.
Flameaxe wrote:Yosarian2 wrote:Really not happy with the way TheAdmeral is trying to do some meaningless math voodo to figure out who we should lynch rather then just placing his own vote based on his own logic.
^this.
ThAdmiral wrote:As I said above, at least I am trying to do something. And you might notice I haven't changed my vote, and am still voting for the person who I chose based on my own logic.
Tanarin wrote:I'm no liking how thAdmadral is suddenly changing up HOW he is calculating his list based on "weight". Notice how it basically made it so Chrono would HAVE to be lynched by his logic. This is AFTER people were deciding that xvart may indeed be a good lynch. Cult looking for a myslynch? I think so.
Unvote Vote Thadmral
populartajo wrote:this is reaching and sheeping
ThAdmiral wrote:
Yosarian2 wrote:Really not happy with the way TheAdmeral is trying to do some meaningless math voodo to figure out who we should lynch rather then just placing his own vote based on his own logic.
As I said above, at least I am trying to do something. And you might notice I haven't changed my vote, and am still voting for the person who I chose based on my own logic.
populartajo wrote:How does Tanarin know that Admiral is pushing for a MISLYNCH?
Battousai wrote:This post is less scummy, more, well, wrong?
Cobblerfone wrote:Yeah, here's a new list, Admiral, top three choices:
Admiral (There's got to be some kind of ulterior motive in this switch of tallying. Whether it's to get the person YOU think is the most scummy lynched, or a theoretical scumbuddy into safety.)
Chronopie
Seraphim
(And yes, I changed the order intentionally. Thank you for keeping track of the lists, though. )
Zdenek wrote:So, I had some time today. Here is my list. I couldn't decide on the third, but here are two:
Flameaxe
Herodotus
Yosarian2 wrote:(shrug) I don't really mind the list; although I've had bad experiences with similar things in the past, I understand the impulse to try to get a consensus created for a lynch before deadline. But I would like to see you scumhunt as well, was my point. It's been a while since we really heard your opinions on anything.
ThAdmiral wrote:DrippingGoofball wrote:Let's speak no more of ordered lists and carry on with the lynch.
Don't make me stop. Please. It's all I've got...
ThAdmiral wrote:We are trying to findone-man scum teams[...]
Zdenek, 1071 wrote:So, I had some time today. Here is my list. I couldn't decide on the third, but here are two:
Flameaxe
Herodotus
Magister Ludi, 1084 wrote:I'm still not very willing to move off Yos2, but at this point in the day if enough people aren't convinced then it probably isn't going to happen. I'm making one last call here.
Chronopie could.
Albert B. Rampage wrote:Let's move this along now, shall we.