danakillsu wrote:inHim wrote:Maybe it was just me
Now you understand.
You may be right and I'm letting history get in the way. I still didn't see it happening.
danakillsu wrote:inHim wrote:Maybe it was just me
Now you understand.
ooba wrote:You comment on Dana\Hez. Commenting on AV ic cool - but you leave out one of your top three scum reads and comment on somebody like Ludi\SpyreX?
Toasty wrote:Which is exactly what INTERNET STRANGER IS DOING.
RedCoyote wrote:Who would this include?
AV wrote:"Why is he scummy?"
Because he's been trying to scare people off his lynch by raging at them.
AV wrote:@Mina: in SAIII where I was town, I drew a lot of early heat on D1, from Scum SpyreX and SK-hopeful-MoI, in particular. You read me as town then. I'm seeing parallels to that game...but no Mina townread? This upsets me.
AV wrote:I'll take the rope today if needed but first people need to look elsewhere because when I flip town you'll all realise that today has been a waste, since most of the people on my wagon have simply voted and haven't even explained it,so it's not like I (or anyone else) can even do a proper wagon analysis to see who I (etc.) think is scum or town.
Toasty wrote:Which is exactly what INTERNET STRANGER IS DOING.
Gorilla wrote:actually, screw it, i'm going to follow my heart here - this is a scummy post
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Gorilla wrote:actually, screw it, i'm going to follow my heart here - this is a scummy post
Please articulate why dana using American rhetoric in his posts is scummy but others doing so (IS, Pooky) doing so don’t get a peep of suspicion from you.
inHimshallibe wrote:
I find it interesting that you jump to the American rhetoric as gorilla's main reason for suspicion. I would tend to think of dropping the line "4 pro-town players..." and not naming them is the scummier bit.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:inHimshallibe wrote:
I find it interesting that you jump to the American rhetoric as gorilla's main reason for suspicion. I would tend to think of dropping the line "4 pro-town players..." and not naming them is the scummier bit.
Well, you'd have to be pretty thick not to see that the 4 Pro-Town players dana was talking about were the four previous Hez voters.
So the American rhetoric is the only other element left.
inHim wrote:To be fair, he didn't list the whole playerlist, which is what he was complaining about.
Also, Spy, were you using the replace-out as a reason to suspect Zhero/IS? 'Cause that's the main reasoning that I get from IS's post.
Gamma is towntowntowntowntown.
inHim wrote:Personally, Hez can eat a nuke, but that's because I don't read him as town, not for cheapass scumhiding reasons.
SDC wrote:SPYREX GODDAMMIT.
THAT'S ALL I'LL SAY FOR NOW.
Vi your vote on IS is pretty funny. hooooo boy
SPYREX YOU'RE BELIEVING' THIS SHIT SHE'S SPEWIN?
WHY
WHY
WHY
inHim wrote:
vote: Lady Lambdadelta
Is there a reason I should not do this? I mean, I'll probably generously offer up an L-1 vote to anyone I don't consider town *coughAVOXcough* and let SpyreX have honors, but I seem to recall some listing LLD as town.
MagnaofIllusion wrote:Gorilla wrote:actually, screw it, i'm going to follow my heart here - this is a scummy post
Please articulate why dana using American rhetoric in his posts is scummy but others doing so (IS, Pooky) doing so don’t get a peep of suspicion from you.
Hindu 677 wrote:You know what pisses me off? I posted a pretty damning piece on the entire AV wagon and it gets ignored.
RC 674 wrote:Your entire defense of AV seems completely derived from meta with the exception of your opening statement where you admit that he is "picking his words too carefully".
Unless I'm wrong, that is a suspicious thing to do in your eyes, right?
gorilla wrote:
reads as cheerleading or buddying players on the wagon, tone is not consistent with his overall style of posting (he goes so far as to decry IS and pooky in ISO #10). IS and pooky's rhetoric looks to be more for yukks. atm I see nothing sinister about pooky, IS i dunno about.
inHim 687 wrote:You think AurorusVox is scum but needs a competitor wagon? OH NO, GET BACK ON THAT AVTRAIN CHOOCHOO.
dana 688 wrote:Love how all that is based on nothing but logic and doesn't try to get people to do what you want by simply telling them to do it. [/sarcasm]
RedCoyote wrote:
I think they're both scum.
And every lynch would always benefit from a competitor wagon. Later in the game, after flips have occurred, we can look to these "either or" decisions through the context of VCA.
Euch. Town mindset is to kill one and then just kill the other. You're not contributing anything by pushing the secondmost popular wagon if you think they're both scum.RedCoyote wrote:dana 688 wrote:Love how all that is based on nothing but logic and doesn't try to get people to do what you want by simply telling them to do it. [/sarcasm]
Well, yeah, bro, because I'm town.
I'm thinking in the long term. I'm thinking, "How will people find the third/fourth scum on D4/5?"The best way to do this would be to force all players to commit their votes to logical, popular wagons. This doesn't mean I think other players shouldn't try to get their wagons more popular, but it just so happens that the two people I want to see dead the most are the first and third most popular vote getters. You better believe I'm going to be on my soapbox.
MoI 692 wrote:If one was scum and one was Town there's a purpose to dueling wagons.
I don't see a point if both are scum.
IS 694 wrote:So RC, you want me to give up my intuition, to give up my ingenuity, give up my freedoms and follow the crowd of lemmings on their way to lynch AV? And you say that youre not a Eurotrash Socialist scumbag?
RedCoyote wrote:MoI 692 wrote:If one was scum and one was Town there's a purpose to dueling wagons.
I don't see a point if both are scum.
As much as I appreciate your deference to my judgment, as crazy as it sounds, sometimes even I cannot predict scum perfectly.
Although I do think they are both scum, I'm realistic enough to think that that would, statistically speaking, be extremely improbable.
That being said, even if it were the case, wagonning two scum on the first day sounds like a good problem to have.
---
IS 694 wrote:So RC, you want me to give up my intuition, to give up my ingenuity, give up my freedoms and follow the crowd of lemmings on their way to lynch AV? And you say that youre not a Eurotrash Socialist scumbag?
If you honestly think you can get a Vi wagon moving, then have at it. I'm just trying to save you some time.
At the bold and the latter quote.RedCoyote wrote:And why would I advocate a wagon on a person I thought was town anyways?
RedCoyote wrote:
As much as I appreciate your deference to my judgment, as crazy as it sounds, sometimes even I cannot predict scum perfectly.
Although I do think they are both scum, I'm realistic enough to think that that would, statistically speaking, be extremely improbable.
That being said, even if it were the case, wagonning two scum on the first day sounds like a good problem to have.