Look at the cute little official looking header he posted complete with bold red lettering of my name to instantly imply that I'm scum. How quaint.
I apologize in advance about the length of this. But a lengthy case on me requires a lengthy rebuttal.
VE wrote:I even proceeded to explain to him why I saw what he was doing as a defense of Workdawg, and he never acknowledges it. Simply doesn't mention it again.
You know what's funny to me? In both of my games, a noob has been accused of the chainsaw defence.
Ok, the part of this that really bugs the shit outta me is where you say "he never acknowledges it." So when I say flat out that I didn't even mention his name, how is that not acknowledging people thinking that I'm defending him? Also, you comment on me being "defensive," yet I have explained that I am just abrasive like this in a game. And even further than that,
you
, sir, even turned around and said:
VE wrote:Why I said you were defending Workdawg, I guess I should've said you were PRESSURING Yonzy.
So why should I even have to acknowledge your accusation that I was defending Workdawg when you yourself said that's not what you meant? So are you trying to misrepresent me now? Or is this just another one of your oversights?
As far as your cute little exhibit B goes, you say I got ultra-defensive? No, this was just mildly defensive. And why was I defensive? Because I misread something and thought you were trying to point the blame at me and that you were trying to get credit behind your statement by saying that you know me. My freakin' bad. The way it read to me was "nonsense reason like everyone else...see red wine
and because I know you
." I was not reading it as red wine being an example of nonsense reasoning and the "I know you" that JJ pulled out as an example as well. Again, my freakin' bad.
I really feel like I should have a monocle when reading through this guy's post here. And a mustache.
EXHIBIT C (DUN DUN DUUUUUUUUN)
Wow, big problem with me not really having any reads? Big friggin problem with the entire game having gone less than 80 posts and me not having any real solid reads? I told everyone flat out that YOU were on my town list. Granted, I didn't explain why, but is that really any different than Al voting Cy but not stating a reason? But really, isn't a VOTE on someone more intense than saying that you think someone's town? And I even stated about bigAl how I was suspicious of him, and even gave a reason why I was suspicious of him. And then I turned around and stated, which goes along with my friggin reads, that I pretty much was null on everyone else, but that I have a bit of meta on JJ so I was going to keep watch on her.
Now, keep in mind this: less than 80 posts into the game, and you even stated later in the game, no much earlier than this post here, that there were only 4 real players in the game. Ok, I talked about you (1), I talked about bigAl (2), I spoke about JJ (3), and I'm the one posting this (4). Hell, I even talked about cy a bit, which goes outside of that "only 4 real players" box.
And as far as giving helpful advice to noobs goes, I didn't want to loose town players based on inactivity/lack of content. Which is what happened twice in my last game. Which is what I stated. Which was caused by noobs jumping on a bandwagon without thinking because players were not active. Which I stated. You've REALLY got a problem with me trying to be helpful to the town?
For your "D," you're whole thing here is that I'm hiding behind other peoples' analyses because I'm too afraid to give an opinion on someone? Except that I've given my reads on people, and when I have posted with any real content, I post my opinions of people. So this is complete "Bullshit indeed."
Ok, rude.
VE wrote:...even requests a link to a previous game to prove an absolutely inane point.
Inane? Bringing out the big boy vocabulary here, no? And how is this inane if I cleary stated in the exact same post that "lynch all liars" being the usual mantra, I didn't have evidence one way or the other. So, I requested that he give me evidence that he wasn't lying. And, hey, guess what, he didn't.
And oh how fun it really is to type MULTIPLE oversights/misinterpretations/exaggerations/whatever. Except that I copy and pasted. And where I was trying to say that you had your *COPY/PASTE* in the same post, which JJ made sure you clarified, and there was 6 posts worth of clarification and then turning around and pointing blame at JJ, who was making sure you were not misrepresenting things.
Jesus, understand this. I'M NOT GETTING SUPER-DEFENSIVE WHEN I TYPE IN CAPS, YOU FRIGGIN IDIOT. Except I was that time. I've stated PLENTY of times that that's just me. And as far as "defensive about Miss JJ 'misrepresenting' him" goes, just like when JJ wanted you to clarify things about your post so she didn't get misrepresented, I was doing the same. I don't want people in this game to make a move based on inacurate information. So yeah.
As far as the "clarifying" things about you goes, your "multiple" included not only stating the votes wrong on me, but also not even being able to see that JJ had in fact voted me.
Ok. I want to take a step back here for just a second.
-You were making statements about how close I was to being lynched, when that wasn't the case.
-Now, you're writing a monologue of a case on me based on faulty reasoning and false evidence.
Both are about lynching me. Why are you so trigger happy to lynch me, especially based on all this poor logic and obvious inability to
count
.
Now back to this long headache...
VE wrote:promise to clarify his "MULTIPLE oversights/misinterpretations/exaggerations/whatever" comment. Yet, he doesn't.
Except in my very next post I did. Your case on how I promised to clarify but didn't, yet in my very next post I did, is utter bullshit and a blatant lie.
VE wrote:That my ONE misreading of the thread
Except that in this you didn't just misread the thread, you also misinterpreted the the thread not on one thing (the vote count on me), but on two (JJ's lack of but actual vote). And honestly, I don't see how you could have miscounted the votes. Just quickly scrolling through (and I encourage everyone to do this; it's fun; try it on your own name too and see what happens) I counted ONE time that my name was even in bold since the game started. And that's going from your 104 post where you miscounted the votes. And I didn't even take the time to read anything before then while scrolling; I just looked for my name in bold, which is how votes are counted.
And he makes one more cute little comment/blatant misinterpretation/LIE:
VE wrote:and is more scummy than, as you percieve him, a lying cymru. Fine.
Please, please, I beg you, tell me where I said I saw you more scummy that cy? Please do that for me. Because I don't recall doing it, and I can't find it in the thread.
So, here's a fun little problem we have here...
VOTE: VisceraEyes
for his repeated attempt at misrepresenting the facts, ignoring facts, and blatantly lying about facts.
Yonzy been gone for a while too.
Al starts rereading again...