Amrun wrote:Okay, that is helpful.
FIRST:
DID EVERYONE FOLLOW THE HYPODOCING PLAN
THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT
Yes, Hoppster was my target.
Hoppster wrote:
Everybody needs to makr a post in which they either CC Newman or don't.
No CC from me.
I don't counterclaim.
Hoppster wrote:
a) No Action at night (to make it 5:1 mountainous)
I'm not sure whether that's town favoured or not.
I actually suspect it may be scum-favoured, but thought I'd put it out there.
No, this assumes no-lynch today.
There are six of us now. If we lynch today, properly, we win. If we mislynch, we'll be 4:1 overnight. NK, mislynch tomorrow, NK and we lose. So making this a mountainous means we have two opportunities to pick the correct target. Do you feel like two of the six remaining players stand out so boldly as scum that we can win this way?
Hoppster wrote:
b) All collectively agree DURING THE DAY on a scummy player that we ALL TARGET at night.
I'll elaborate on B later today (but probably not for a good 8+ hours) as I'm off on a day trip to Sheffield today and it's something I'd much prefer to type on a computer keyboard over a phone keyboard. (You may get it earlier if I get really bored.)
I'm skeptical, but I'd need to see your elaboration, I'm concerned that there might be situations where all this does is protect the scummy target while allowing him to fulfill his nightkill.
Hoppster wrote:
c) Continue with hypo-doc'ing
This feels very much like B, but with even more possibility of mishandling or misreading the situation, pre and post.
====
More from Tim_Hill1990 please, and please don't rush a lynch while I'm gone.
V/LA until Sunday night, going out of town to celebrate my anniversary
Men's evil manners live in brass; their virtues we write in water.