Soooooooo after the last hour or so of reading a few people stand out to me.
1) Nintendoaddict1:
Struck me as odd in the very beginning. I wouldn't have taken an RVS accusation remotely seriously no matter how intent the accuser seemed to be with it. However, Nintendo64 took the time to calmly and rationally answer archaebob's questions. In general that seems pro-town, but he it much to serious about it. He is responding as though there was a threat, rather than responding to generate discussion. Scum tend to do that, not town.
SuperNintendo wrote:
No, I like to make it clear when I am using an RVS vote, because some people do not make it known, thus it makes it very confusing as to whether or not it is actually random, so unless I say RVS I am making a serious vote.
Now it's painfully fucking obvious that it was an RVS vote without him saying anything. This is clearly redundant and the result of nervous energy.
NintendoWii wrote:Aren't all votes early in the game RVS anyway? Labeling a few of them does not make every other vote a serious one.
Yes, yes they are. Labeling them is strange especially if you already accept the idea that all early votes will be RVS votes. I believe I saw earlier archaebob explain the idea that scum will explain how their play is townie without being prompted. This labeling of your RVS vote is an example of that. "Don't vote me, I'm just random voting."
nintendoaddict1 wrote:archaebob wrote:My vote is dead serious.
Instead of speculating about what I'm doing, why don't you do something productive.
Okay, I'll do that right away.
Vote: archaebob
This is cute.
nintendoaddict1 wrote:archaebob wrote:nintendoaddict1 wrote:
Okay, I'll do that right away.
Vote: archaebob
Good boy.
archaebob is agreeing with my vote on him...
inb4jester
This has departed from cute and is now stupid.
nintendoaddict1 wrote:hiplop wrote:i dont really have a meta tbh. I play differently depending on how im feeling. I think one thing that reigns supreme throughout all m games, is that i'm a terrible day one-r. Almost every game i attract some sort of attention on me day one. I am at least putting content forward, i apologize for the bad typing, im not feeling that great and not paying much attention.
Does anyone else notice how Demon is pretty much worshipping bob? no one finds that even a little suspicious? i think it warrants a wagon at least
Oh, I've noticed, but to whom do you think it is deserving a wagon of? bob, or Demon?
This is a little more interesting. I don't usually go after people for buddying, but that is very much what it looks like here. He saw someone else who agrees with his pseudo suspicion of archaebob and jumped on it. He has made no previous mention of suspecting DemonHybrid, but now he's on to him! Can't you see him smiling while he writes that?
Oh, and the burden of proof for your vote is on you. You should be justifying it, not waiting for it to be unjustified. Be an active player.
nintendoaddict1 wrote:archaebob wrote:@ nintendo -
I'm not sure he suspects me at all. That's the whole point.
And you didn't answer my question from before. What are you accomplishing with your vote?
Right now, it's not doing much of anything, it seems.
UNVOTE:
Your vote isn't accomplishing anything so you just get rid of it? You don't vote somewhere else maybe? You do, but not until a few posts later. That means you weren't reading anybody except archaebob at that point. If you had been, you would have been able to switch your vote more efficiently to another significant read rather than going back to find out who else has been suspicious. This is VERY indicative of scum play. You watch one player and argue with/vote them to appear to be active. Interesting.
nintendoaddict1 wrote:Scumhunter wrote:Nintendo, please think about why you want to vote me. Is it solely because I have been lurking? Does that make me scum? Normally lurking is actually somewhat of a scumtell from me, but if you check my other games on here I have been similarly inactive the last few days. Ignoring my lurking up until this point...why would you want to vote me?
Like I said, the vote on you was to ensure you would actually post something. Seeing as you have, I'll
UNVOTE: .
Oh, but wait, something stood out to me in that wall:
Scumhunter wrote:I suppose it's possible that he is a very good scum player trying to take charge from the beginning of the game... How anyone reads bob as scum is beyond me.
What's this? Saying bob could be scum, and in the same post, showing disbelief that anyone could see bob as scum?
What is this I don't even...
wtf? ................
IF YOU HAVE SKIPPED EVERYTHING UP TO THIS POINT, PLEASE READ THIS NEXT PART.
Nintedoaddict1 wrote:If you need to move on... then move on. Yes, I am bothered by his lack of content, he is usually more active. But in another completed game I played with Pine, (Mini 1156) he turned out to be scum, so his lack of activity here is a towntell for him.
As for me not liking your play, I'll have to get into that later as I am going out the door.
I saved this for last, because it is BY FAR the most interesting tid bit in Nintendo's play.
Most importantly, you make a meta argument. This meta argument is based on exactly one game. Pine posted lots as scum, and little now. Therefore he is playing differently than he did as scum, and therefore he is most likely town.
archaebob (who you are still voting at this point in the thread) posted a town meta game a long fucking time ago in which he plays almost
exactly
as he is playing now. Clearly you accept the value of meta, yet you ignore archaebob's cited meta for your own purposes. That my friend is fabricated reasoning, and that is scum play.
vote: Nintendoaddict1
The other people who seem scummy to me are hiplop (gut read mostly, haven't read him in iso yet), Pine, and Maaayyyyybeeee ace.
Archaebob, heliman, and to a lesser extent Barry Allen are town.
~Fixed.
-pappums rat
"If you are going to tell people the truth, you had better make them laugh. Otherwise they'll kill you."