Magua wrote:PeregrineV wrote:Well, as I said to Green, [Pine]'s a null alignment wise.
PeregrineV wrote:As for scumreads...let's say Magua, Pine and MehPlusRawr for now.
@Magua- You probably just got mixed up in your mind. Otherwise, that would be serious hardcore misrepresentation posting my second post before my first post. I think you wanted to show:
PeregrineV in Post 184 wrote:@bvoigt- last two posts mainly. Although will continue to expect more.As for scumreads...let's say Magua, Pine and MehPlusRawr for now.
@Battle- Welcome to town, were we don't know and have to guess/figure it out, and are in the dark until the mod makes the deathpost. Is it different for you?
P-edit: See, now Magua posted something. I'll post first then read it.
And then this:
PeregrineV in Post 225 wrote:Magua wrote:PeregrineV wrote:@Magua- Before I answer that, I'm curious as to why your so insistent on it.
My insistence on getting an answer is directly related to your insistence on you not giving me an answer.
Well, as I said to Green, he's a null alignment wise.
Which was refering this paragraph:
PeregrineV in Post 215 wrote:@Green- Pine is a hyper aggressive tunneling player who takes offense easily. While that has no bearing on his alignment, it does affect how he plays. Since I am somewhat put off by that playstyle, he usually trips scummy for me from the start. But, rationally and logically, no bearing on alignment. So, right now he's a straight null read alignment wise.
Camn I've only played one game with. So I base anything now on her actions. She's active, she's coherent, she's not belligerent. I like the playstyle. However, no bearing on alignment..etc. So, instead of thinking town like I want to, I have her as a null also.
And the interactions between the two of them haven't changed my opinions above, it's mostly how I arrived at them.