Fine I'll do some analysis now, nothing better to do. Three obvious scums now, which should be the entire team:
Pine is scum for reasons already stated.
Valern wrote:I know I'm not done catching up yet, but I think I am confident enough for a Barry vote right now. He's just. So. Amazingly. SCUMMY.
VOTE: Barry
I find it hard to believe that you could place such a seemingly oblivious-to-current-events vote when we were at L-1 3 days before deadline. It's just bizarre. This is the only person out of the three that could conceivably not be scum, because there is a small chance that he really wasn't aware of the situation.
foilist13 wrote:Archaebob, heliman, and to a lesser extent Barry Allen are town.
This is the first thing that foilist says about BA this game.
foilist13 wrote:unvote
I'm not going to have an apathy lynch here. Replace out if you don't want to be invovled in the game and let us deal with your replacement.
Vote: Barry Allen
Valern has sparked my interest in you.
This is the second.
foilist13 wrote:Lynching the claimed PR day 1 is bad play. If the scum don't off him tonight we can lynch him tomorrow. I suggest you read Barry Allen rather than foreshadowing your suspicions.
This is the third.
So it went from BA is mildly town (fine), to a hop off of an "apathy lynch" to vote BA because "Valern sparked my interested in you" (fine, still nothing scummy here), to "Lynching the claimed PR day 1 is bad play" and "I suggest you read Barry Allen". Wait what?
Let's break it down. First we aren't lynching Pine because it's an "apathy lynch", next think you know it's because he claimed PR. And why are you suggesting I read Barry Allen when all you're doing is latching on to Valern's case?
Oops.