Mostly for my own knowledge, and to put it out there for anyone else to read, I'm going through anything Zdenek has opinioned (I made a word, yep) about me. Kind of an ISO, if you will.
Zdenec 419 wrote:Flameaxe's question was completely reasonable, but her answer completely dodged actually responding to the question, but instead posited a situation where Cobbler might have risked making a gambit with an unrecruitable claim.
Nothing worth commenting on really. I had a reasonable question.
Zdenek 1071 wrote:So, I had some time today. Here is my list. I couldn't decide on the third, but here are two:
Flameaxe
Herodotus
Note, this is the SECOND post that even mentions me from Zdenek. Yet I am one of two people he thinks is lynchworthy day one (and assuming the list is in order, I am the number one lynchworthy target). Nothing from him at this point shows anything to support my placement on this list, and no votes ever supported it on day one.
Zdenek 2049 wrote:I think the reactions of Fritzler, Flameaxe to Herodotus' list and investigation result are suspicious.
A wonderfully vague suspicion. That about sums up any opinion I have on this post. I will add that this is the only post of day two to mention me, as vague as it is.
Zdenek 2183-4 wrote:Vote: Flameaxe
Seriously, Flameaxe basically has to be scum because of his LL vote. He was on Cobbler, who's been pretty scummy all game, and there is essentially no reason to unvote him. In the post where he unvoted it seemed like he acted as though his vote was on Katsuki. If you ask me, it was a move to put his vote in a place where it was more fluid.
Combined these two posts to save some quote blocks. There was every reason in the world to unvote cobble at that point. Well, one reason. A major reason: HIS WAGON WAS GOING NOWHERE YESTERDAY. I had given what I could to convince the rest of the town to go after Cobble, and it wasn't going anywhere. As I even mentioned in that same post, I was fully ready to move my vote to Kat, but Kat was L-1 at the time, and I was not ready for a hammer without at least hearing something from Kat. I made this clear.
I will say, as I said in my original reply to this post, if Cobble was as scummy as you make him out to be when you attack me, you too would be voting for Cobble, but you were not. In fact, at no point in this game have you voted Cobble yourself. You have, in a horrifically non-committal way, declared support for the wagon (and a few others for what its worth).
Zdenek 2585 wrote:Here we see Flameaxe doing what Porochaz did day one - shutting down discussion by attempting to predict the reaction to a comment he is making, rather than allowing the discussion to proceed naturally.
A) What I said before: Nothing is stopping you from discussing naturally but you not actually discussing it. You're using a throwaway comment as an excuse to ignore anything I said in the post this was a reply to. I stand by my thoughts there, and expect them to be taken seriously.
B) Explain to me why this is scummy. Because a scum did it? It sure sounds like a personality trait much more than a tell.
I already replied to the posts since then.
The part people on the go should read:
Basically, the point I'm trying to get at: I've been a strong suspect of yours since day one. The only actual points you have made to support that are an incredibly vague suspicion on day two, and events of day three. Something does not work out here. I highly doubt I am the only one who notices this. If anything, this whole post supports my logic
here.
Okay with this now:
Vote: Zdenek
. You've been hiding under the radar too long.