CrashTextDummie wrote:
Yos2 to AGM in #394 wrote:The difference is, is that you are jumping to conclusions for no apparent reason, which is scummy since there's a possible scum motive for doing so and no obvious reason a townie would jump to that conclusion, while I am simply not coming to any conclusion on the subject without information.
His whole argument against AGM went roughly like this:
1. "I think it's likely the whole neighborhood is town since none of them seem suspicious to me."
2. "Scum are therefore likely to suggest there is one scum in the neighborhood."
3. "AGM is therefore scum."
It'sallbased on Yos2 jumping to conclusions. His attack feels very disingenuous.
No, it's not.
A: I think that the stance AGM was taking was scummy, in and of itself. I explained this in great detail.
B: Even if I'm wrong about A, or if if AGM actually believed what he was saying, then if he believed that the right thing to do is to lynch a neighbor, he should have actually acted on it. I still don't get why he was so gung-ho to lynch a neighbor in theory, but never even seemed to seriously consider voting any of the neighbors for any reason in reality.
There isn't any "jumping to conclusions" in my argument at all, CTD. Yes, i was wrong about AGM, and that sucks. Pro-town people are wrong about 50%-70% of the time on day 1, learn to deal with the fact.
