Amrun wrote:You would consider shooting all of those?!
Well no; but it might help if Kinetic thinks I'm somewhat of a loose cannon. (oh, wait.....)
Amrun wrote:You would consider shooting all of those?!
Herodotus wrote:Yosarian2 wrote:1. Protecting someone from recruit, preventing a recruitment from happening, is much better for the town then you watching Kinetic recruit someone and then us lynching that person tomorrow, and fairly obviously so. The idea that we should waste a protection on you just so you can watch someone else makes no sense from a pro-town perspective.
I think that applies to Magister too.
bvoigt wrote:ConSpiracy wrote:Because he was fencing in the last few days.
The only thing he was vocal about was the location claiming and cult doc directing thing.
This post doesn't seem like fencesitting to me.
Yosarian wrote:
Zdenek: ... Claimed "pharmacist", with a "50% chance of succeeding at protecting someone". Hasn't clarified what that means, but it doesn't really make any sense either. Why would Flay put in one single role with percentage chance of success into a game like this with no other roles like that? That would be a REALLY odd decision. I think he's probably lying cult as well.
ooba, 3341 wrote:xvart wrote:ooba, 3297 wrote:If you do not correct something which is incorrect in this list & I find out via a watch - I'll consider it as a "culled" claim.
Remind me but I remember you not having conclusive information about specific people visiting places, only more a voyeur type role knowing someone visited a place. So how does location claiming help you determine if someone is lying about their location?
When I watch a particular location, I get info about who stays there and who also visits during a particular night. For example
-- On one night, I just saw a player walk into the location (which confirmed that it was his base location)
-- On the night I watched the bank, I saw SL+Batt arriving and walking in together
So my watch results are useless if I can't accurately target the location of the person who I want to watch.
It is if we lynch town since the worst case scenario puts us pretty close to lost.Cobblerfone, 3356 wrote:but it's no big loss if one of the other two is lynched instead.
This post is incredibly weird. You want to lynch someone unless they provide something big? How does that make any sense or pro town in anyway? Either way you splice it you are wanting to lynch someone who you hope can provides big information or you are letting scum live another night before you want to lynch him. Are you hoping he provides information on a scum partner or are you delaying the lynch of someone you think is scum? Either way, you aren't lynching someone who you think is scum; it doesn't make sense.ConSpiracy, 3375 wrote:I've thought about it, and I do not think claiming home base matters.
#22, barber shop.
Though I want ooba to come with something very big, otherwise I'd like to see him lynched.
Again, directing all night actions to a small percent of the population while the Cult runs amok on the larger population. Got it. The point is that we have multiple ways of preventing cult recruitment or catching Cult in a single night, and if we direct all of our resources to a single target we eliminate the double dip effect while telling the cult exactly where to go and what to do to maximize their efforts. The only benefit I can see to doing this is that it gives us a narrower lynch pool to find who was recruited that night; but the eliminated pool is so small it would be insignificant.Cobblerfone, 3381 wrote:I know this was directed at Ooba, but I don't think it's terrible as long as that person can be confirmed town by Hero in the same night simply because I don't like doubt.
ConSpiracy wrote:Wait, ML, are you going to say that cult already won?
That quickhammer was horrible.
ConSpiracy wrote:Wait, ML, are you going to say that cult already won?
That quickhammer was horrible.
ConSpiracy wrote:Oh, nevermind. I didn´t read his last post.
To be honest, I have been skimming this game the last few pages. It is not very appealing.
And NS, where are you talking about with keep using that word? It's like the first time I mentioned it.
Amrun wrote:ConSpiracy wrote:Wait, ML, are you going to say that cult already won?
That quickhammer was horrible.
Everyone is whining about this but no one is saying that it's scummy.
It is, especially if zdenek flips town.