Not busy anymore.
Nobody Special, why did you change your random vote from RoboThor to Amrun? And if you were going to change your vote, why not join the Auckmid wagon?
I disagree with Maruchan's #21. Not participating in RVS voting itself is more or less a nulltell. Though voting is the typical way to get out of the RVS, there are plenty of people who dislike it, and feel there are superior methods. And meta on RVS participation is just silly. People change from game to game, and people change approaches on how to get out of the RVS and generate conversation. Also, nice fence-sitting there. Do you feel that saulres' lack of a RVS vote makes him scummy or not?
Also, I'm not sure I completely understand why you so thoroughly wish to stop any RQS, Maruchan. Why do you care so much about RoboThor jumping on anybody? Especially if you "LOVE" the RQS? After all, they could be scum anyway and therefore deserve the pressure, right? And interactions between RoboThor and the RQS-starter could give the town a good deal of information, no?
I don't like thunderwielder's random questions. Not because they are random, but because they don't seem to give the town that much information on the other players. Scum often ask generic questions like these, because it makes it look like the player is contributing, when they aren't. That said:
1) I live in California, so I'm in the pacific.
2) Pretty irrelevant, but I played a couple of games on Mafiascum a couple years ago, that I then proceeded to flake out of. Have also played a bit of EpicMafia.
3) Also irrelevant, but I will hopefully post at least once a day, though I will only post when I see something worth talking about, of course.
Now, for the meat.
saulres wrote:Sigh. I can't win with RVS.
There are good reasons I tried to avoid it this time. Maybe next game I'll just post one random vote and not say anything else for a while.
This is dodging the question. There is nothing wrong with posting two random votes-though it is interesting-but that's not what the contradiction was about. The contradiction was that you asked if you could change votes without being suspicious, indicating that you cared whether or not you looked suspicious, and then saying that you didn't care whether people found you suspicious or not.
In fact, Glowball asked the same question earlier:
glowball wrote:
Why are you worried? You will only look suspicious if you are suspicious. Why would you need to change a RANDOM vote anyway?
You dodged it then, too, answering the second question, but not the first.
To clarify, here is the question: Why did you care if changing random votes would make you look suspicious, if you don't care if you look suspicious or not?
Vote: saulres
I like this wagon.
In other news, liking glowball this far. Asking the right questions, pushing the right players.
Nobody Special, Auckmid, Supreme Overlord: any thoughts on the game thus far?