DemonHybrid wrote:Last: Does anyone want my name claim? I'm for it, but only if it's the consensus.
You already claimed.
Pay attention.
DemonHybrid wrote:Vifam wrote:I'd also like aDeadline Extension
To anyone who still thinks my claim is fake, tell me why I decided to pick a UNIT instead of just clicking some random character in the the SC wiki?
ding ding ding ding ding
scooby wrote:Vifam, when you claimed there were still seven people to claim, so random claiming for sc wki would be a suicide claim in case other player had your fakeclaim as a real claim.
scooby wrote:DemonHybrid wrote:Last: Does anyone want my name claim? I'm for it, but only if it's the consensus.
You already claimed.
Pay attention.
DemonHybrid wrote:killerjester wrote:I'm sorry, how does misspelling Overlord make it a valid claim when it's still the only non-name claim out of 12 players?
I just see it as a subconscious mistake after reading it directly from the PM.
This doesn't matter regardless. I firmly believe that scum do NOT have fakeclaims.
DemonHybrid wrote:Vifam wrote:I'd also like aDeadline Extension
To anyone who still thinks my claim is fake, tell me why I decided to pick a UNIT instead of just clicking some random character in the the SC wiki?
ding ding ding ding ding
kiwieagle wrote:DemonHybrid wrote:Vifam wrote:I'd also like aDeadline Extension
To anyone who still thinks my claim is fake, tell me why I decided to pick a UNIT instead of just clicking some random character in the the SC wiki?
ding ding ding ding ding
Actually you wanna know what this sounds to me?
"im gonna get lynched, but since DH put a counter-wagon I need more time so esp gets more vote"
kiwieagle wrote:oh and:
Vifam lurked until someone finally came and defended her
scooby wrote:Also you wanted a case? Here is a case:
You have 34 posts, of which:
- are fluff or promises to post (iso 1, 2, 7, 8, 15, 16, 17, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31
- 1 is a very weird "town vs. town" comment that you later justify as gut, iso 4, iso 9.
- 1 is a defense of Morthas and a wrong attack against avas for "he wasn't talking to you specfically" when Morthas clearly did, iso 5.
- 1 is another weird "this seems like a scum bussing tactic", iso 12
- 1 is a contradiction with your previous stance on rewq: you said you didnt agree with rewq scum in iso10 but then you voted him in iso 13 and to L-1!.
- 1 is an overreaction to the race vs race theory that made you fullclaim when no one asked you to (trying to look town with a power role that fits your fakeclaim). iso 19
- 1 is a blatant lie, since you were the only one asking rewq to fullclaim, iso 23.
- 1 is another contradiction with your previous stance on Espe: you said you didn't see him a scum in 27. Once you got the support for DemonHybrid, you somehow forgot what you said about him.
Question, why were you posting ion other games and not here over the past days?
kiwieagle wrote:So your defense is
"i have not been paying attention to this game so all your points are null."
scooby wrote:Tell me, why would Raynor want to lynch an overlord?
Vifam wrote:scooby wrote:Also you wanted a case? Here is a case:
You have 34 posts, of which:
- are fluff or promises to post (iso 1, 2, 7, 8, 15, 16, 17, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31
- 1 is a very weird "town vs. town" comment that you later justify as gut, iso 4, iso 9.
- 1 is a defense of Morthas and a wrong attack against avas for "he wasn't talking to you specfically" when Morthas clearly did, iso 5.
- 1 is another weird "this seems like a scum bussing tactic", iso 12
- 1 is a contradiction with your previous stance on rewq: you said you didnt agree with rewq scum in iso10 but then you voted him in iso 13 and to L-1!.
- 1 is an overreaction to the race vs race theory that made you fullclaim when no one asked you to (trying to look town with a power role that fits your fakeclaim). iso 19
- 1 is a blatant lie, since you were the only one asking rewq to fullclaim, iso 23.
- 1 is another contradiction with your previous stance on Espe: you said you didn't see him a scum in 27. Once you got the support for DemonHybrid, you somehow forgot what you said about him.
Question, why were you posting ion other games and not here over the past days?
ISO 12 + 13 make complete sense, you say my bussing theory is "weird" then you say that I was contradicting myself on Rewq being scum.
WHY?
IS0 19 isn't an "overreaction" it was a completely viable question seeing how KJ was "confident". And it didn't lead me to full claiming, that's misrepsentation at a HIGH level.
ISO 27 isn't a contradiction, I said "You're doing a lot of sheeping I don't think scum would have the balls to do" when someone spoke up about this being his scumplay, I kind of put off my stance on him.
kiwieagle wrote:So your defense is
"i have not been paying attention to this game so all your points are null."
Are you
Are you serious?