NY139: Underground Mafia (Game over!)

Vifam · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:20 am

I...I was joking about the dead wife thing.

For now on, when I am joking, I'll use exclamation marks!

sorgster wrote:
uncledaphne wrote:
TheAwesomeAll wrote:you sold out uncledaphne

vote sorgster

redFF might also be scum.

Sold out?

I guess you are the only one with basic reading comprehension Vifam. Sold out doesn't equal to getting an avatar. It made me confused. I also wasn't the only one to countervote I believe. I was confused by what he said. Not the only person here.

Now you're just deflecting, weather or not everyone OMGUS'd isn't the case here. I'm telling everyone that your vote makes you look like you have a guilty conscience.

I'm not defending anyone, this is more about focusing pressure on Sorg rather then defending TTA ( Who is null right now).

Stringer Bell · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:34 am

Vifam wrote:

sorgster wrote:
uncledaphne wrote:
TheAwesomeAll wrote:you sold out uncledaphne

vote sorgster

redFF might also be scum.

Sold out?

I guess you are the only one with basic reading comprehension Vifam. Sold out doesn't equal to getting an avatar. It made me confused. I also wasn't the only one to countervote I believe. I was confused by what he said. Not the only person here.

Now you're just deflecting, weather or not everyone OMGUS'd isn't the case here. I'm telling everyone that your vote makes you look like you have a guilty conscience.

I'm not defending anyone, this is more about focusing pressure on Sorg rather then defending TTA ( Who is null right now).

To be honest, I was just as confused as sorg seemed to be...it was sort of a strange post, in that all three lines had nothing to do with one another, I guess sorg thought that TTA thought that sorg had sold daphne out, but I'm not sure that would make any sense, we were just out of RVS and sorg hadn't done anything to warrant "selling daphne out". Sorg must have some sort of power role, whether it be scum or town, he clearly feels that he needs to stay alive. I'm going to hold off on voting for him, it would be terrible to get rid of a cop or doc D1. Definitely someone to keep an eye on, but we don't have enough information to make a foolproof case that he's scum.

Stringer Bell · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:35 am

Vifam wrote:I...I was joking about the dead wife thing.

For now on, when I am joking, I'll use exclamation marks!

Come on...not sure that's something you should joke about. Any other explanations for Nunez's weird posts?

Stringer Bell · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:35 am

EBWOP: Those two posts were supposed to be one post, I had them open in separate tabs and was going to copy and paste it all together into one post...whatever.

Vifam · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:36 am

Fair enough Stringer.

I'd like more people to chime in, though.

Vifam · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:40 am

EBWOP:

I should replace "Basic reading comprehension" with "Reading carefully".

eep · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:50 am

Vifam wrote:I'm not defending anyone, this is more about focusing pressure on Sorg rather then defending TTA ( Who is null right now).

I think TheAwesomeAll's post was a bit confusing, even if sorgster massively overreacted to it, but, you're right, that isn't important. And nonetheless,

unvote, vote: sorgster

.

Stringer Bell wrote:...it would be terrible to get rid of a cop or doc D1. Definitely someone to keep an eye on, but we don't have enough information to make a foolproof case that he's scum.

and we never will, til he's dead.

Not to say it's terrible not to vote him, but looking for a foolproof case might be the wrong way of going about things.

eep · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:53 am

Vifam wrote:EBWOP:

I should replace "Basic reading comprehension" with "Reading carefully".

The lack of commas made it confusing.

The first way I read it was that sorgster had sold out his mafia buddy uncledaphne to protect his own ass.

sorgster · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 8:24 am

eep wrote:e first way I read it was that sorgster had sold out his mafia buddy uncledaphne to protect his own ass.

That's the way I first read it to and was why I was completly confused. But that made no sense at all to me. I'm not scum. I don't understand how saying I'm confused makes me scummy.

TheRainMan · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 8:28 am

Vote Uprising

because Suzaku is more badass than Lelouch

*scratches belly*

I might vote eep later for making mountains out of molehills.

eep · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 8:33 am

how so?

eep · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 8:34 am

sorgster wrote:
eep wrote:e first way I read it was that sorgster had sold out his mafia buddy uncledaphne to protect his own ass.

That's the way I first read it to and was why I was completly confused. But that made no sense at all to me. I'm not scum. I don't understand how saying I'm confused makes me scummy.

it's not that you got confused, it's that you got super aggressively defensive about it.

sorgster · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 8:45 am

sorgster wrote:
TheAwesomeAll wrote:
you sold out uncledaphne

vote sorgster

redFF might also be scum.

What in the world are you talking about?

TheAwesomeAll wrote:ah sorry for the confusion

vote: sorgster

Confusion? I'm still confused, explain what you meant by that plz.

sorgster wrote:
TheAwesomeAll wrote:you sold out uncledaphne

vote sorgster

redFF might also be scum.

What in the world are you saying? This makes no sense at all.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: TheAwesomeAll

That is aggressively defense? I asked him to explain what he meant and said it made no sense because I was confused and wanted clarification.

TheAwesomeAll · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 8:57 am

you didnt "ask me to explain" you voted for me right away, dont lie

Vifam · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 8:59 am

Sorg.

Look at the vote you placed..

sorgster · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 9:02 am

TheAwesomeAll wrote:you didnt "ask me to explain" you voted for me right away, dont lie

I voted then asked for an explanation.

sorgster wrote:
TheAwesomeAll wrote:you sold out uncledaphne

vote sorgster

redFF might also be scum.

What in the world are you saying? This makes no sense at all.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: TheAwesomeAll

Vifam wrote:Sorg.

Look at the vote you placed..

I wasn't the only person in this game to countervote in this game.

Vifam · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 9:09 am

You voted him as if you had a guilty conscience, as if you thought you were accused of something you didn't do.

Sorg wrote:I wasn't the only person in this game to countervote in this game.

More deflection? Okay.

The vote stays for now.

sorgster · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 9:12 am

Vifam wrote:You voted him as if you had a guilty conscience, as if you thought you were accused of something you didn't do.

Sorg wrote:I wasn't the only person in this game to countervote in this game.

More deflection? Okay.

The vote stays for now.

I voted for him because what he said made no sense and it seemed made up. Not because of a guilty conscience.

Vifam · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 9:14 am

Then why would you ask him to explain it if you thought it was made up?

sorgster · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 9:18 am

Vifam wrote:Then why would you ask him to explain it if you thought it was made up?

I thought he was saying I was selling out a scumbuddy and I was scum which

seemed

made up to me. I asked him to explain because I wanted clarification.

Vifam · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 9:18 am

sorgster wrote:
Vifam wrote:Then why would you ask him to explain it if you thought it was made up?

I thought he was saying I was selling out a scumbuddy and I was scum which
seemed
made up to me. I asked him to explain because I wanted clarification.

HOW COULD THAT SEEM MADE UP IF YOU ARE TOWN?

Vifam · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 9:19 am

IT'S A CONFIRMED LIE IF SOMEONE SAYS THAT TO YOU.

RIGHT?

sorgster · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 9:22 am

Vifam wrote:IT'S A CONFIRMED LIE IF SOMEONE SAYS THAT TO YOU.

RIGHT?

Weren't you the one who said that if I read carefully it was about the avatars? What I inferred seemed made up but he was apparently talking about something else.

Mysterio · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 9:23 am

sorgster wrote:
Vifam wrote:Then why would you ask him to explain it if you thought it was made up?

I thought he was saying I was selling out a scumbuddy and I was scum which
seemed
made up to me. I asked him to explain because I wanted clarification.

Wouldn't it be absolutely made up if you're town? I agree his post was confusing, but usually the response to a 3 line post with a handful of words is to not become defensive for several posts and vote the guy. You didn't just ask for clarification, you pretty much tunneled him afterwards and voted for him. It was a strange reaction to a post with almost zero content. Why did you feel the need to take the post so seriously?

sorgster · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 9:26 am

Mysterio wrote:
sorgster wrote:
Vifam wrote:Then why would you ask him to explain it if you thought it was made up?

I thought he was saying I was selling out a scumbuddy and I was scum which
seemed
made up to me. I asked him to explain because I wanted clarification.

Wouldn't it be absolutely made up if you're town? I agree his post was confusing, but usually the response to a 3 line post with a handful of words is to not become defensive for several posts and vote the guy. You didn't just ask for clarification, you pretty much tunneled him afterwards and voted for him. It was a strange reaction to a post with almost zero content. Why did you feel the need to take the post so seriously?

Because he was accusing me of being scum. It was in random vote stage(or just out of it) so how was it tunneling? I've also been defending, so I'm not the one tunneling I think.