NY139: Underground Mafia (Game over!)

[trekker]

I'm calling him stupid what?

Oh
My
God
You're
Stupid

it's oh my god you suck

[paraffin]

Or, getting back on topic, VOTE: Mysterio for turning mafia into a spectator sport.

[trekker]

Actually, sorgster's a much better lynch than paraffin.

VOTE: sorgster

[paraffin]

Then what did you mean by this?

oh yeah

i see it

[trekker]

Where?

He's calling you stupid.

oh yeah

i see it

[paraffin]

ah. whatever, the whole exchange was stupid.

not so sure why you guys are so excited about this sorgster wagon though

[trekker]

Just look at sorgster's dialogue and you'll see it.

[uncledaphne]

Sorgster wagon is quite stupid. Not quite sure why its in place. Trekker doesnt seem scummy though, just has the wrong idea. Paraffin is obvious pro-town.

[paraffin]

The other being: I "overreacted" which is ridiculous seeing how Sorg's reaction to TTA's vote was an "overreaction".

I hate how you are tunneling on me just because I countervoted.

Doesn't make him look good, but doesn't make him look scum. Just whiny. I don't like all this 'tunneling' talk; it's way to soon for anyone to actually be convinced by their own arguments. If anyone is actually tunneling right now (I'm getting my definition of this from http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Tunneling) they're terrible at this game.

[sorgster]

I guess I'll have to stop being so whiny then and create a defense.

[David Xanatos]

Actually, I base my meta on Vifam from games I've read as well as my own experience with her. *shrug*

[paraffin]

so you're sticking with your call, xanatos?

[paraffin]

sorgster: great start

[David Xanatos]

For now, yes. If something stronger than meta turns up, I may reconsider, but for now, vote sticks.

[sorgster]

sorgster: great start

thanks. Beats the one I had in my newbie game.

[paraffin]

david, care to share a quote or something from a finished game? You're not gonna get much support without even trying to include us on your reasoning.

[Vifam]

For now, yes. If something stronger than meta turns up, I may reconsider, but for now, vote sticks.

Your meta is wrong. I am town, buddy.


Still, I don't even see my play as aggressive :/

[David Xanatos]

Paraffin, click Vifam's name, then click "view their topics", and read.

[uncledaphne]

Vifam don't be ignorant.

[Vifam]

I think it's more quick and fast then "aggressive".

[uncledaphne]

I think it's more quick and fast then "aggressive".

Son it was one post, why were you so sure?

[Vifam]

I think it's more quick and fast then "aggressive".

Son it was one post, why were you so sure?

I wasn't "sure" you're blowing the caught scum thing, WAY out of proportion.

[paraffin]

uncle, it's called scumhunting. Allow me to demonstrate: VOTE: uncledaphne for buddying, not scumhunting, and a dumb picture.

Xanatos, I'm not going to read pages upon pages of game threads to find an example of vifam being aggressive when you probably have at least an idea of where to look and what to look for.

[paraffin]

What's more, you shouldn't expect everyone in the game to do likewise. Don't use evidence we don't have access to. Share it or stop talking about it

[Vifam]

I concur


UNVOTE:

VOTE: Uncle