NY139: Underground Mafia (Game over!)

paraffin · Post Post #200 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 3:57 pm

uncledaphne wrote:friend.

OH OH! he's buddying! SCUM! SCUM!

trekker · Post Post #201 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 3:58 pm

Vifam isn't mafia because he's my friend.

trekker · Post Post #202 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 3:59 pm

Daphne, I think you need to learn how to play.

uncledaphne · Post Post #203 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:00 pm

Vifam wrote:
uncledaphne wrote:So basically you just admitted to trying to quick lynch to sogster. Thank you for proving my point
friend.

No, not at all.

Read my post again.

Yeah I did. And it means exactly what I said it meant. Para is contradicting his placeholder is not a tell thing and generally saying stupid things. I still dont think hes scum but hes getting progressively more frustrated, which is a major scumtell.

Unvote

Vote:Vifam

For obvious reasons

Vifam · Post Post #204 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:01 pm

uncledaphne wrote:
Vifam wrote:
uncledaphne wrote:So basically you just admitted to trying to quick lynch to sogster. Thank you for proving my point
friend.

No, not at all.

Read my post again.

Yeah I did. And it means exactly what I said it meant. Para is contradicting his placeholder is not a tell thing and generally saying stupid things. I still dont think hes scum but hes getting progressively more frustrated, which is a major scumtell.
Unvote

Vote:Vifam
For obvious reasons

No

Read the post again.

"Applying preassure"

"Quicklynching"

TheRainMan · Post Post #205 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:03 pm

inb4 quick lynch

uncledaphne · Post Post #206 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:03 pm

Vifam I'm not restating myself again. Trekkers acting nonsensical

trekker · Post Post #207 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:04 pm

hahahahahah

trekker · Post Post #208 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:04 pm

VOTE: uncledaphne

paraffin · Post Post #209 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:05 pm

uncle, YOU are the one acting nonsensically.

Also, where have I contradicted myself on the placeholder vote not being a scumtell thing?

panda bear guy, how about you give us some input while you're here?

Vifam · Post Post #210 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:07 pm

uncledaphne wrote:Vifam I'm not restating myself again. Trekkers acting nonsensical

uncledaphne · Post Post #211 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:08 pm

So, let me get this straight. Most of you are voting for me because I placeheld my town read. Nonone actually explained how it was in anyway scummy, Vifam and Trekker are obviously voting for me because I went against Vifam. Its been two days and they already want to quicklynch.
Paraffin you accused me of scum because I looked scummy. Wheres your explanation?

trekker · Post Post #212 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:12 pm

uh

i'm voting for you because you made a chainsaw defense for sorgster and then you made terrible pushes, like saying redFF was scum because he agreed with vifam. you're not acting towny @all

TheRainMan · Post Post #213 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:15 pm

To me it looks like uncle is acting unusually stubborn even though his original post is justified. Doesn't seem scummy to me though, just misplaced. Vifam though sees how its turning around and with newfound back up is getting more on the offensive than the defensive which is the most mafia like behaviour from anyone I've seen here. Linking players together on Day 1 is pretty darn scummy but if i'd give it a guess i'd think i'd be pretty safe is saying that para and Vifam are not on any cooperative team together. Basically if one of them flips scum I'd probably discount the other as being scum unless something dramatic happened. Oddly enough trekker is giving me a town vibe! Maybe it's because he's so scummy my scumdar malfunctioned..

There that's my input!

TheRainMan · Post Post #214 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:15 pm

I tried to post 3 times but you noobs kept ninja'ing my post spot! >:[

uncledaphne · Post Post #215 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:17 pm

trekker wrote:uh

i'm voting for you because you made a chainsaw defense for sorgster and then you made terrible pushes, like saying redFF was scum because he agreed with vifam. you're not acting towny @all

You never said that before. Redff jumped onto the sorg bandwagon far too easily. Sorgster was wronly accused by Vifam. Vifam tried to quicklynch him, he failed, jumped off and now is trying
to quicklynch me for little reason. You mindlessly agreed with him.

TheRainMan · Post Post #216 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:18 pm

trekker wrote:uh

i'm voting for you because you made a chainsaw defense for sorgster and then you made terrible pushes, like saying redFF was scum because he agreed with vifam. you're not acting towny @all

I think that were mistaking his "attack" on vifam as a "defense" of Sorgster. That makes it seem like teamwork doesn't it?

uncledaphne · Post Post #217 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:20 pm

Rainman is right in most of his points. He seems very protown

TheRainMan · Post Post #218 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:26 pm

I hope you're not trying to drag me down with you T_T but stickin by my posts.

paraffin · Post Post #219 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:29 pm

Uncle, please stop calling wagons and votes attempts at quicklynching. We've told you multiple times that nobody is looking for a quicklynch.

I agree that the whole Sorgster thing was a dumb idea; I never jumped on that wagon myself because I agreed with you and Sorg that TheAwesomeAll's post was rather confusing and read Sorg's reaction as confused. Vifam and redFF thought sorg was scummy because sorg misread the vote on him as a serious vote and was confused, which vifam and redFF thought was him being overly defensive.

trekker · Post Post #220 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:31 pm

Where's the mindless agreement? I never said that I was sheeping Vifam.

uncledaphne · Post Post #221 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:33 pm

TheRainMan wrote:I hope you're not trying to drag me down with you T_T but stickin by my posts.

Well sorry friend. If everything goes along with Vifams plan he'll quicklynch me then try to blame you as my partner

Par, vifam tried to get a quicklynch on sorg for a minuscule reason. Look how many votes I have on myself. Mainly because I couldnt change my vote because I couldnt bold on my phone. You might as well quicklynch my
cell phone while your at it

Trekker your uhh statement when you tried to explain why you were voting for me. Why did you say that?

sorgster · Post Post #222 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:34 pm

Unvote
Vote UncleDaphne

I hate how theawesome only made two or three posts in the topic before starting the first bandwagon. Only

scum

vote for someone they see as town. If you want to put your vote somewhere but not sure where, just unvote without revoting.

redFF · Post Post #223 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:35 pm

uncledaphne wrote:
trekker wrote:uh

i'm voting for you because you made a chainsaw defense for sorgster and then you made terrible pushes, like saying redFF was scum because he agreed with vifam. you're not acting towny @all

You never said that before. Redff jumped onto the sorg bandwagon far too easily. Sorgster was wronly accused by Vifam. Vifam tried to quicklynch him, he failed, jumped off and now is trying
to quicklynch me for little reason. You mindlessly agreed with him.

why was he wrongly accused

UNVOTE:
VOTE: uncledaphne

redFF · Post Post #224 (ISO) » Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:36 pm

uncledaphne wrote:
TheRainMan wrote:I hope you're not trying to drag me down with you T_T but stickin by my posts.

Well sorry friend. If everything goes along with Vifams plan
he'll quicklynch me then try to blame you as my partner

Par, vifam tried to get a quicklynch on sorg for a minuscule reason. Look how many votes I have on myself. Mainly because I couldnt change my vote because I couldnt bold on my phone. You might as well quicklynch my
cell phone while your at it

Trekker your uhh statement when you tried to explain why you were voting for me. Why did you say that?

scumslip?