Scott Brosius - 1 - (DeityKabuto) (L-3)
Guido Crescendo - 1 - (andrew94) (L-3)
andrew94 - 3 - (zMuffinMan, bvoigt, Guido Crescendo) (L-1)
bvoigt - 1 - (Cirno) (L-3)
Not Voting: Scott Brosius
With 7 alive it's 4 to lynch!
DK wrote:Lets hurry and lynch scott, Thor was Town and he suspected scott. Scott already has suspicion since both days ago. He is not a bad lynch.
Scott wrote:Cirno looks bad on the GC wagon assuming that it's not all town.
Scott wrote:Knowing myself to be town, it would be all town if you are town. That seems unlikely but is ultimately WIFOM.
scott wrote:How does me being on wagons look bad? I don't understand that concept.
scott wrote:The VCA is interesting though. Cirno looks bad on the GC wagon assuming that it's not all town.
scott wrote:I never suggested that, or at least I did not intend to. In a game that is 4/12 scum with 2 scum groups it seems HIGHLY unlikely that any collection of 6 players would all be town. Even just randomly taking 6 players puts that at about 8%.
scott wrote:Yank being off every wagon was the only other interesting thing to me. That screams avoidance and an attempt to just cruise through.
scott wrote:I don't understand the concept of being on wagons, when I have explained all my votes.
zMuffinMan wrote:scott wrote:I never suggested that, or at least I did not intend to. In a game that is 4/12 scum with 2 scum groups it seems HIGHLY unlikely that any collection of 6 players would all be town. Even just randomly taking 6 players puts that at about 8%.
I've seen far too many people lynched on this basis. It's a really easy excuse for scum to jump on. For example, Cold War Mafia (which bvoigt played in) - Enigma was lynched pretty much purely on bandwagon analysis (he was part of an 8 person bandwagon on town that was entirely town, and supposedly the odds of that happening were extreeeeemely low). I'm always wary of people using this as an excuse for lynching someone because it's a cop out substitute for actually scum hunting.
scott wrote:Yank being off every wagon was the only other interesting thing to me. That screams avoidance and an attempt to just cruise through.
So what's your actual opinion on andrew then?
Do you think he's scum?
Why are you withholding your vote?
scott wrote:I don't understand the concept of being on wagons, when I have explained all my votes.
Most people explain their votes. Even "senseless vote hopping" is generally explained in one way or another.
----
Anyway, back to business.
VOTE: andrew
In post 1145, bvoigt wrote:My vote will probably be on Scott, but I'll try to do more thorough analysis as soon as I can.
In post 1147, Scott Brosius wrote:In post 1145, bvoigt wrote:My vote will probably be on Scott, but I'll try to do more thorough analysis as soon as I can.
Is this only case here that I've been on wagons? Why choose me over GC if that is true (given that he has also been on every wagon besides his own)