NY139: Underground Mafia (Game over!)

Vifam · Post Post #400 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:21 am

VOTE: Daphne

Uprising · Post Post #401 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:29 am

So many people who have said next to nothing. x.x

I think sorgster is town. However, this is gut.
No longer certain red is town.
Pretty sure Vifam is town right now. Again, gut.

I don't think I can read TAA well myself, but his replies to cases on him are lacking and full of sarcasm, which is generally a trait I see in scum more.
But the conclusion he's Godfather is kinda... weird? However, eep makes a good point on him.

I very much think AntB might be scum, though. AntB, what is your favourite colour?

redFF · Post Post #402 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:18 am

uncledaphne wrote:Never thought I would play with derps on my first game. *Is disappointed in others*

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

get out

StevieT92 · Post Post #403 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2011 9:09 am

Uncledaphne, you deserved to be lynched based off your play. You have nobody to blame but yourself.

The person who jumps out at me for being the most scummy yesterday is Sorgster. Not for getting on the wagon, but the fact that he does it for weak reasons and also tried to cover his own ass saying he overreacted. UD wasn't a bad lynch based on his play, but sorgster didn't even seem to be concerned with that. For that reason,

vote: Sorgster

I know I promised a long post but I'm gonna procrastinate it.

sorgster · Post Post #404 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2011 9:25 am

StevieT92 wrote:Uncledaphne, you deserved to be lynched based off your play. You have nobody to blame but yourself.

The person who jumps out at me for being the most scummy yesterday is Sorgster. Not for getting on the wagon, but the fact that he does it for weak reasons and also tried to cover his own ass saying he overreacted.
UD wasn't a bad lynch based on his play, but sorgster didn't even seem to be concerned
with that. For that reason,
vote: Sorgster

I know I promised a long post but I'm gonna procrastinate it.

What do you mean? I voted for him and brought him to l-1.

StevieT92 · Post Post #405 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:17 am

sorgster wrote:
StevieT92 wrote:Uncledaphne, you deserved to be lynched based off your play. You have nobody to blame but yourself.

The person who jumps out at me for being the most scummy yesterday is Sorgster. Not for getting on the wagon, but the fact that he does it for weak reasons and also tried to cover his own ass saying he overreacted.
UD wasn't a bad lynch based on his play, but sorgster didn't even seem to be concerned
with that. For that reason,
vote: Sorgster

I know I promised a long post but I'm gonna procrastinate it.

What do you mean? I voted for him and brought him to l-1.

I mean that you didn't address why you were voting for him at all when you did it.

sorgster · Post Post #406 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:23 am

sorgster wrote:
uncledaphne wrote:
TheRainMan wrote:I hope you're not trying to drag me down with you T_T but stickin by my posts.

Well sorry friend. If everything goes along with Vifams plan he'll
quicklynch me then try to blame you as my partner

Par, vifam tried to get a quicklynch on sorg for a minuscule reason. Look how many votes I have on myself. Mainly because I couldnt change my vote because I couldnt bold on my phone. You might as well quicklynch my
cell phone while your at it

Trekker your uhh statement when you tried to explain why you were voting for me. Why did you say that?

Scumslip? look at the bolded part. We find out your role after you get eliminated. So to blame someone as their partner, they would first find out their role.

I forgot to bold my vote btw.

Unvote

Vote uncledaphne

#225

I then unvoted to put pressure on trekker and jumped on the bandwagon a bit after that.

implosion · Post Post #407 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2011 3:29 pm

Vote Count 2.2

AntB - 1 (Stringer Bell)
Vifam - 1 (TheRainMan)
redFF
Nunez - 2 (sorgster, Hiraki)
David Xanatos
Uprising
sorgster - 2 (TheAwesomeAll, StevieT92)
StevieT92
TheRainMan
Daybid
nocase
TheAwesomeAll - 3 (Vifam, RedFF, eep)
Stinger Bell
Hiraki
eep
trekker
Not voting - 7 (AntB, Nunez, David Xanatos, Uprising, Daybid, nocase, trekker)

With 16 alive, 9 votes are required to lynch.

Deadline is in (expired on 2011-09-16 17:00:00).

If you

ever

notice a mistake that I've made with the votecount (or elsewhere) don't hesitate to tell me.

trekker · Post Post #408 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2011 5:52 pm

VOTE: Stringer Bell

redFF · Post Post #409 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:29 pm

trekker wrote:VOTE: Stringer Bell

care to explain

trekker · Post Post #410 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:43 pm

not particularly

trekker · Post Post #411 (ISO) » Sat Aug 27, 2011 9:40 pm

vifam

Hiraki · Post Post #412 (ISO) » Sun Aug 28, 2011 12:02 am

Nunez.

Please come back.

TheRainMan · Post Post #413 (ISO) » Sun Aug 28, 2011 1:56 am

Looking at the people who want to vote Nunez. I consider it as wasting a lynch at the moment and just hoping to get someone off who can't put up a fight. I hate inactivity as much as the next guy but that's my take on it.

StevieT92 · Post Post #414 (ISO) » Sun Aug 28, 2011 6:54 am

TheRainMan wrote:Looking at the people who want to vote Nunez. I consider it as wasting a lynch at the moment and just hoping to get someone off who can't put up a fight. I hate inactivity as much as the next guy but that's my take on it.

I wouldn't say the word "can't" put up a fight. He's choosing to not put up a fight at this point. He needs to post content or he should by lynched or vigged.

Hiraki · Post Post #415 (ISO) » Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:13 am

There's two people on Nunez, one who has made it clear I have no want to lynch Nunez, and one who hasn't.

Why is it now a lynch?

Stringer Bell · Post Post #416 (ISO) » Sun Aug 28, 2011 7:24 am

TheRainMan wrote:Looking at the people who want to vote Nunez. I consider it as wasting a lynch at the moment and just hoping to get someone off who can't put up a fight. I hate inactivity as much as the next guy but that's my take on it.

To piggy-back on this point, if Nunez was lurking scum, why would he post such weird stuff to bring attention to himself? I'd really like him to start posting stuff that the rest of us understand, and I think people are hoping that the votes will bring on some pressure to make him post useful stuff.

redFF wrote:
trekker wrote:VOTE: Stringer Bell

care to explain

trekker wrote:not particularly

okay then.

Uprising · Post Post #417 (ISO) » Sun Aug 28, 2011 8:23 am

I do agree with TheRainMan on the issue of Nunez. I don't understand that Stringerbell vote at all. He seems fairly town to me.

I'm going to vote AntB as he's the person I feel is scummiest at this point in time.

VOTE: AntB

eep · Post Post #418 (ISO) » Sun Aug 28, 2011 8:52 am

HEY SOMEONE

VOTE FOR ME

StevieT92 · Post Post #419 (ISO) » Sun Aug 28, 2011 10:30 am

eep wrote:HEY SOMEONE

VOTE FOR ME

Fos: eep

don't get this at all. Post something productive, this is not it.

StevieT92 · Post Post #420 (ISO) » Sun Aug 28, 2011 10:31 am

Hiraki wrote:There's two people on Nunez, one who has made it clear I have no want to lynch Nunez, and one who hasn't.

Why is it now a lynch?

I don't think it should be our lynch TODAY, but clearly if nunez contines his pattern of posting he deserves to be killed.

Hiraki · Post Post #421 (ISO) » Sun Aug 28, 2011 10:53 am

That was more towards TheRainMan than towards you.

I should've quoted though, so that was my bad.

Your word choice is quite intriguing.

You basically said that you want him dead, but he shouldn't be today's lynch, he should be killed.

Do you want to explain this more? Are you trying to insinuate him to be vigbait, or do you just not want to deal with him?

trekker · Post Post #422 (ISO) » Sun Aug 28, 2011 11:15 am

StevieT92 wrote:
eep wrote:HEY SOMEONE

VOTE FOR ME

Fos: eep

don't get this at all. Post something productive, this is not it.

that fos didnt make sense

sorgster · Post Post #423 (ISO) » Sun Aug 28, 2011 11:35 am

StevieT92 wrote:
Hiraki wrote:There's two people on Nunez, one who has made it clear I have no want to lynch Nunez, and one who hasn't.

Why is it now a lynch?

I don't think it should be our lynch TODAY, but clearly if nunez contines his pattern of posting he deserves to be killed.

StevieT92 wrote:
eep wrote:HEY SOMEONE

VOTE FOR ME

Fos: eep

don't get this at all. Post something productive, this is not it.

So you vote for someone who is not posting anything productive like nunez but are saying we shouldn't vote nunez for him to be lynched?

implosion · Post Post #424 (ISO) » Sun Aug 28, 2011 11:56 am

nocase is being prodded.