NY139: Underground Mafia (Game over!)

[Vifam]

I don't what you mean by that.

[eep]

no activity

also I guess I should clarify that by "day" I mean 24 hour period.

[trekker]

Yes. thank you. We must go back on SB.

VOTE: Stringer Bell

[trekker]

Everybody who is town should vote with me.

[eep]

I can't find where you explained your stringer bell read.

I think I'd rather do theawesomeall.

[Hiraki]

you all.

are traitors.

[trekker]

386

586 - had unvoted on antb but piggybacks your post

eeep, please bus your scumbuddy.

[eep]

these are not linking me to pages where stringer bell has posted at all

are there multiple page settings on this forum?

[eep]

wait, 586 is his post

I don't really feel like that was piggy-backing, especially because he didn't just jump around to the most likely lynch candidates from what I can tell.

got anything else?

[implosion]

Vote Count 3.3

AntB - 3 (Vifam, sorgster, Uprising)
Vifam - 1 (AntB)
redFF - 1 (Hiraki)
Uprising - 1 (eep)
sorgster - 1 (redFF)
StevieT92
TheRainMan
Daybid
nocase
TheAwesomeAll
Stinger Bell - 2 (nocase, trekker)
Hiraki
eep - 1 (TheAwesomeAll)
trekker
Not voting - 4 (StevieT92, TheRainMan, Daybid, Stringer Bell)

With 14 alive, 8 votes are required to lynch.

Deadline is in (expired on 2011-09-25 17:00:00).

If you

ever

notice a mistake that I've made with the votecount (or elsewhere) don't hesitate to tell me.

[StevieT92]

IDK who to vote, so I'm gonna wagon AntB.

vote: AntB

[Uprising]

IDK who to vote, so I'm gonna wagon AntB.

vote: AntB

That feels SO wrong to me.

[eep]

no kidding

UNVOTE:
VOTE: StevieT92

[eep]

Okay! So here's a somewhat more serious think through of the currently living players who I've been suspicious of or whom others have been suspicious of.

TheRainman:
59 - RV after RVS ended with the sorgster wagon.
He spends most of the game buddying pretty much everyone except Vifam, but also suggests that Stringer Bell might be suspicious here, but that he has no desire to vote stringer bell unless he's bandwagoning. Also changes his mind on sorgster in D2.
He seems very concerned with getting information out of lynches, which is confusing to me? Or perhaps more relevantly, the question is under what circumstances a player would be more interested in getting information out of players instead of lynching them. At any rate, he doesn't seem very endgame-oriented.

Daybid:
Has literally made 5 posts with almost no content, and doesn't really seem to be following the thread. um...

AntB:
Can't really get a read on him, but I actually found his post summarizing the votes that happened and the reasons why really helpful especially in the case of Stringer Bell. Except, he portrays Stringer Bell, for instance, as defending sorgster with a daphne vote, and I really can't find any evidence of this being the case? @AntB, how did you figure that Stringer Bell was defending daphne, or that his post suggested a sorgster vote would be more logical?

Stringer Bell:
Found the unvote post that trekker was talking about. And, yeah, actually, I don't get it. @Stringer Bell, why did you unvote AntB yesterday?
also realized something else, so UNVOTE: StevieT92, VOTE: Stringer Bell.
If Stringer Bell flips town, we should look at trekker tomorrow.

redff:
doesn't strike me as scum when I totally ISO him. I'd give him a dick town read.

TheAwesomeAll:
seems to believe that any player changing their mind is "wishywashy," which strikes me as very arbitrary. I would give him a scum read.

nocase:
would be nice if he would post a little more. I have absolutely no read on him. Coincidentally, he proposed a lynch for David Xanatos early on D2 and it happened. nocase is the hidden game master. we should lynch him.

sorgster:
overexplains everything he says, and does a lot of slightly shady stuff.
if sorgster is scum, then TheAwesomeAll is not and vice versa.

Vifam:
yeah, not really getting a scumread at all.

StevieT92:
is super angry.

Uprising:
has only ever cast a vote on AntB, and generally seems to be just sorta skimming unless called out?

[Uprising]

redff:
doesn't strike me as scum when I totally ISO him. I'd give him a dick town read.

I've actually been trying to say that. I mean, obviously not in the same words, but "dick town" actually sums him up quite nicely. But yeah, he's definitely town.

I'll be back in about an hour to post more. I am such an idiot. First week in my dorm and I left a bazillion things at home so I have to go buy an alarm clock for tomorrow. Effing cell phone dying on me.

[AntB]

@AntB, how did you figure that Stringer Bell was defending daphne, or that his post suggested a sorgster vote would be more logical

He wasn't defending uncledaphne, he was attacking uncledaphne for defending sorgster. At the time of reading the post seemed to attack and build a greater point against sorgster than uncledaphne.

---

IDK who to vote, so I'm gonna wagon AntB. vote: AntB

Oppotunity knocks, you answer, right? Shame oppotunity knocked a page or two ago and you missed it.

[AntB]

Also, uprising is town, if she was scum she'd be all over this like a rash.

[Uprising]

Like a rash? I'd hardly call it that. (Also, that was not an hour, I'm sorry.)

I reread eep's post on TRM and apparently I've misread most of TRM's posts.

There are a bunch of people we have not seen enough of which is bothering me a ton. It's neither town-only or scum-only but it's a major pain in the ass.

[sorgster]

Unvote

Vote Daybird

Going to make you talk. Anyone want to help?

[TheAwesomeAll]

AntB:
Can't really get a read on him, but I actually found his post summarizing the votes that happened and the reasons why really helpful especially in the case of Stringer Bell. Except, he portrays Stringer Bell, for instance, as defending sorgster with a daphne vote, and I really can't find any evidence of this being the case? @AntB, how did you figure that Stringer Bell was defending daphne, or that his post suggested a sorgster vote would be more logical?

youre scum, or antB is scum, or youre both scum.

[Stringer Bell]

Stringer Bell:
Found the unvote post that trekker was talking about. And, yeah, actually, I don't get it. @Stringer Bell, why did you unvote AntB yesterday?
also realized something else, so UNVOTE: StevieT92, VOTE: Stringer Bell.
If Stringer Bell flips town, we should look at trekker tomorrow.

Finally, someone who voted me with an actual question or some sort of evidence. I originally voted AntB here, citing his super non-commital-ness. Seemed scummy to me. I reiterated my own point here when AntB asked me why I voted him, and said that I would unvote him if/when he became more town in my eyes. My scumread on AntB wasn't huge, but it was worth a vote to see what the reaction would be. When he became more town, I unvoted, just like I said I would. Then, he became more scummy here, hence my re-vote.

[Vifam]

Damm it why can't we lynch Anbtb?

[sorgster]

Damm it why can't we lynch Anbtb?

I have no idea. He is easily the most scumlike player here. I heard scum tend to be harder to lynch than townies. His scumbuddies deflect attention. This time to stringer bell who semms town to me.

[TheAwesomeAll]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: AntB

[Hiraki]

You know.

IF FEEL REALLY GOOD WITH THIS REDFF VOTE.

but i can change to stevie.

and only stevie.