He changed it from "Nervous and sarcastic" to "Paraphrased and sarcastic".In post 97, whispersilk wrote:You'd clearly buy anything.
Picking up on little things and seeing where they take you does not = flustered. Friend blatantly changed the entire tone of monk's post.
Ah, but you do.whispersilk wrote:Hell if I know if monk is scum.
It was.whispersilk wrote:What I do know is that Friend voted for monk using the reasoning that monk's tone was a nervous one when he claimed it was all a plan. It wasn't.
Yeah, do we care?whispersilk wrote:Friend changed the tone and wording of monk's post to support his reasoning.
Cool story, bro.whispersilk wrote:End of story.
whispersilk wrote:Oh wait, Empking still hasn't answered my question.
Is This your question to Empking?
I think you have to take it on a case by case basis. I think this is a case where it was fine. Friend plays like that.In post 66, whispersilk wrote:Don't you think there is anything suspicious about someone changing the words and tone of a post to suit their claims?
whispersilk wrote:Kudo's to the scum who have been bold enough to jump on my wagon thus far.
Is this what they call tutoring? That's tutoring, right?