In post 843, trekker wrote:Teddy, stop tunneling on sorgster.
Meant to write RedFF. My phone corrected it.
In post 843, trekker wrote:Teddy, stop tunneling on sorgster.
Well if I had results then it would be 100%.In post 864, SodaSpirit17 wrote:I don't see how anyone can have a 99.9% townread on anyone unless if they have results. And he said he was gonna claim but never did so..
What the fuck do you mean untrue?sodaspirit wrote:This is also awful, and untrue. The Nunez votes were crap even though he wasn't doing anything, but still.
In post 417, Uprising wrote:I do agree with TheRainMan on the issue of Nunez. I don't understand that Stringerbell vote at all. He seems fairly town to me.
I'm going to vote AntB as he's the person I feel is scummiest at this point in time.
VOTE: AntB
In post 486, Uprising wrote:I don't like nocase's two posts. The language is unnecessary.I'm glad I'm in his list of towns, though.
In post 711, Uprising wrote:VOTE: AntB
I definitely think I was wrong.
My initial vote must have been correct after all.
In post 841, Uprising wrote:Believing you're scum does not mean we necessarily know who all your buddies are, from my viewpoint.
I think you're scum, but I'm unsure who else is.
Just like 3.9 is 4.In post 867, Vifam wrote:99.9999999999 IS 100%
soda wrote:david flipped town and im not scum so your theory is wrong.