NY139: Underground Mafia (Game over!)

Hiraki · Post Post #950 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:06 am

FOllie me padawan

sorgster · Post Post #951 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:08 am

In post 949, eep wrote:goddamnit, i find all of the people who are gunning for antb suspicious except for vifam, so i don't really want to vote him

but then i also find uprising suspicious and antb insists that he's town

i don't know what to do anymore

I hate how everyone is trying to quickwagon sodaspirit. AntB has played scummy enough on his part. The only way we are going to guarentee scum is a cop result or a scumslip. As both are unlikely, we can never be 100% sure so lynch the most suspicious. In this case, it is AntB. I will be very happy if he is scum.

redFF · Post Post #952 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:24 am

uprising sorgster scum, not sure of anyone else.
eep probably town, hiraki too.

eep · Post Post #953 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:29 am

sorgster i find you way more suspicious than antb, why should i vote for him?

also, hiraki and trekker are probably my biggest town reads, so if they don't find him suspicious i doubly don't want to vote for him

sorgster · Post Post #954 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:58 am

In post 953, eep wrote:sorgster i find you way more suspicious than antb, why should i vote for him?

also, hiraki and trekker are probably my biggest town reads, so if they don't find him suspicious i doubly don't want to vote for him

Assuming they are both town, why would they always go on scum? They could hit scum instead. So what you are saying is that you will sheep hiraki and trekker and not go after anyone they don't find suspicious. Strange.

SodaSpirit17 · Post Post #955 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:59 am

sorgster what did i tell you about the word scumslip....

sorgster · Post Post #956 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:59 am

ebwop: I meant they could hit town instead*.

sorgster · Post Post #957 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 12:00 pm

In post 955, SodaSpirit17 wrote:sorgster what did i tell you about the word scumslip....

Don't use it? I haven't been using it have I? Other than for uncledaphne.

Uprising · Post Post #958 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 12:13 pm

UNVOTE: SS17

Apparently it's scummy for me to vote him.

Red, why am I scum? Why are you *so sure*? You've said that you're calling it now on several people.

That exchange between sorgster and SS17 just before my post feels... odd to me. It almost feels like coaching to me, but that *should* happen in their QT, no?
Just my thoughts on what is currently happening.

Uprising · Post Post #959 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 12:14 pm

Like, I mean it feels like SS17 is saying that sorgster is slipping to me.

SodaSpirit17 · Post Post #960 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 12:27 pm

In post 951, sorgster wrote:
In post 949, eep wrote:goddamnit, i find all of the people who are gunning for antb suspicious except for vifam, so i don't really want to vote him

but then i also find uprising suspicious and antb insists that he's town

i don't know what to do anymore

I hate how everyone is trying to quickwagon sodaspirit. AntB has played scummy enough on his part. The only way we are going to guarentee scum is a cop result or a scumslip. As both are unlikely, we can never be 100% sure so lynch the most suspicious. In this case, it is AntB. I will be very happy if he is scum.

scumslip doesn't guarantee someone is scum... only a cop scan and even then they might not be sane. lol.. be careful with wordchoice.

Uprising wrote:Like, I mean it feels like SS17 is saying that sorgster is slipping to me.

na, that's not the case, he just doesn't seem to know the meaning of scumslip and it annoys me when he uses it all the time

AntB · Post Post #961 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 12:44 pm

sorgster wrote:AntB needs to die. He sounds like scum to me.

Build a case then and prove you're more than VI.

----

@Uprising
Since when do you care if a vote is scummy or not..? O_o

----

@SodaSpirit17

SodaSpirit17 wrote:Hmmmm... where to proceed from here... AntB is closer to death, so let's kill him imho. However, Up is on close watch..

Go swing from rope already. That post screams of "Lets mislynch faster" and possible setting up a chain lynch.

sorgster · Post Post #962 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 12:54 pm

In post 958, Uprising wrote:UNVOTE: SS17

Apparently it's scummy for me to vote him.

Red, why am I scum? Why are you *so sure*? You've said that you're calling it now on several people.

That exchange between sorgster and SS17 just before my post feels... odd to me. It almost feels like coaching to me, but that *should* happen in their QT, no?
Just my thoughts on what is currently happening.

He's told me to not say scumslip again in the other game I played with him as I said someone scumslipped about 50 times in that game.

sorgster · Post Post #963 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 12:57 pm

Ebwop: Also, since soda is a replacement how could this conversation have been in the qt if we were both scum?

eep · Post Post #964 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 1:31 pm

In post 954, sorgster wrote:
In post 953, eep wrote:sorgster i find you way more suspicious than antb, why should i vote for him?

also, hiraki and trekker are probably my biggest town reads, so if they don't find him suspicious i doubly don't want to vote for him

Assuming they are both town, why would they always go on scum? They could hit scum instead. So what you are saying is that you will sheep hiraki and trekker and not go after anyone they don't find suspicious. Strange.

not what I said there, and also not consistent with my voting history. I haven't just been sheeping them, and I don't intend to. but if I have a null read on someone and they have town reads, you bet your ass that I am NOT voting for that person.

okay, so, people who aren't on the antb wagon, who are you suspicious of?

I'm looking at stringer bell, sorgster, theawesomeall, sodaspirit, or uprising, though I'm actually leaning a little away from uprising?

redFF · Post Post #965 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 2:16 pm

EVERY POST U MAKE IS LIKE WHAT I DESCRIBE HERE

(tags fixed)

redFF · Post Post #966 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 2:16 pm

lol goddamn it

StevieT92 · Post Post #967 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 4:00 pm

In post 963, sorgster wrote:Ebwop: Also, since soda is a replacement how could this conversation have been in the qt if we were both scum?

i like how you just made a good point for your own lynch

implosion · Post Post #968 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 4:02 pm

Now searching for a replacement for nocase. Still searching for a replacement for Daybid.

redFF · Post Post #969 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 4:09 pm

v/la till friday night.

SodaSpirit17 · Post Post #970 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 4:17 pm

yea sorgster brings up a point. if we were both scum we couldn't communicate during the day. Come on Uprising, you can do better than that..

StevieT92 · Post Post #971 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:05 pm

In post 970, SodaSpirit17 wrote:yea sorgster brings up a point. if we were both scum we couldn't communicate during the day. Come on Uprising, you can do better than that..

that is NOT what he was saying

implosion · Post Post #972 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:23 pm

Vote Count 3.7

AntB - 5 (Vifam, StevieT92, TheAwesomeAll, SodaSpirit17, sorgster) (L-3)

Vifam
redFF
Uprising - 2 (redFF, eep)
sorgster
StevieT92
SodaSpirit17 - 2 (Hiraki, AntB)
Daybid
nocase
TheAwesomeAll
Stringer Bell - 2 (nocase, trekker)
Hiraki
eep
trekker
Not voting - 3 (Daybid, Stringer Bell, Uprising)

With 14 alive, 8 votes are required to lynch.

Deadline is in (expired on 2011-09-25 17:00:00).

If you

ever

notice a mistake that I've made with the votecount (or elsewhere) don't hesitate to tell me.

Currently searching for replacements for Daybid and nocase.

SodaSpirit17 · Post Post #973 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:27 pm

lol AntB nice reason to find a horrible way to countervote me. Seriously lol at ppl on my wagon.

trekker · Post Post #974 (ISO) » Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:40 pm

I don't see a problem with the wagon, considering you threw out 7 weak foses and jumped on Ant's wagon.