In post 988, eep wrote:That does not describe my interactions with you at all
You're just not paying attention and trying to do whatever possible to push your own agendas on a few specific players. I've yet to see you make ANY case against anyone. And let's look at your voting history: day 1, you just gunned for sorgster until hammering on daphne. Day 2, you basically didn't do anything, but you threw a vote on sorgster for a while. Oh, and today, despite my being OH SO SUSPICIOUS, you jump OFF me and ONTO AntB once you see that no one's paying attention to your accusations and he's garnering some attention. So, by your own reasoning, we should be doing this: UNVOTE: , VOTE: TheAwesomeAll.
And, seriously, why are you more concerned with bragging post-game than with PLAYING THE GAME.
im not more concerned more with the post game brag, im just seeing things in perspective. there is no way hiraki is getting lynched atm, i have no real case against him but more of a gut feeling. the post game brag is the most i can do. also this :
In post 999, eep wrote:also, sorgster, want a case? why's stringer bell buddying me instead of scumhunting?
so not only am i scum for mentioning you, sorgster(perhaps the biggest scum) is scum for accusing you and stringer bell is even scummier for defending you. you dont really like the spotlights do you?
